Characterizing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Credentialing in Pediatric Emergency Departments.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003193
Julia Aogaichi Brant, Beth D'Amico, Jonathan Orsborn, Amanda G Toney, Samuel H F Lam, Megan Mickley, Lilliam Ambroggio
{"title":"Characterizing Point-of-Care Ultrasound Credentialing in Pediatric Emergency Departments.","authors":"Julia Aogaichi Brant, Beth D'Amico, Jonathan Orsborn, Amanda G Toney, Samuel H F Lam, Megan Mickley, Lilliam Ambroggio","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is unclear which pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) have a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) credentialing process or if this process is consistent per expert guidelines. Our objective was to describe formalized POCUS credentialing processes across PEDs that are active in the pediatric emergency medicine POCUS (P2) Network.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was developed from nationally recommended credentialing guidelines. This anonymous survey was sent out to the P2 Network comprising more than 230 members involved in pediatric POCUS. The survey was analyzed using descriptive analysis with counts and percentages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 PEDs responded to the survey. All departments had a faculty member in charge of maintaining the credentialing process, and all faculty members had POCUS education available; 88.6% of education was scheduled didactics or bedside teaching. There were 80.6% of PEDs that had a process for internally credentialing faculty. Some PEDs offered protected education for POCUS, however, 44.8% had <50% of their faculty credentialed. There were 4 PEDs that offered incentives for completion of POCUS credentialing including salary bonuses; only 1 offered shift buy down as incentive. That PED had 100% of its faculty credentialed. All PEDs performed quality assurance on POCUS scans done in the ED, most done weekly. Billing for scans occurred in 26 PEDs. Skin/soft tissue and focused assessment with sonography for trauma were the 2 most common applications credentialed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among PEDs surveyed, there was a lack of standardization of POCUS resources and components of credentialing. Incentives may be beneficial in improving credentialing faculty and standardizing the credentialing process.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: It is unclear which pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) have a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) credentialing process or if this process is consistent per expert guidelines. Our objective was to describe formalized POCUS credentialing processes across PEDs that are active in the pediatric emergency medicine POCUS (P2) Network.

Methods: A survey was developed from nationally recommended credentialing guidelines. This anonymous survey was sent out to the P2 Network comprising more than 230 members involved in pediatric POCUS. The survey was analyzed using descriptive analysis with counts and percentages.

Results: A total of 36 PEDs responded to the survey. All departments had a faculty member in charge of maintaining the credentialing process, and all faculty members had POCUS education available; 88.6% of education was scheduled didactics or bedside teaching. There were 80.6% of PEDs that had a process for internally credentialing faculty. Some PEDs offered protected education for POCUS, however, 44.8% had <50% of their faculty credentialed. There were 4 PEDs that offered incentives for completion of POCUS credentialing including salary bonuses; only 1 offered shift buy down as incentive. That PED had 100% of its faculty credentialed. All PEDs performed quality assurance on POCUS scans done in the ED, most done weekly. Billing for scans occurred in 26 PEDs. Skin/soft tissue and focused assessment with sonography for trauma were the 2 most common applications credentialed.

Conclusions: Among PEDs surveyed, there was a lack of standardization of POCUS resources and components of credentialing. Incentives may be beneficial in improving credentialing faculty and standardizing the credentialing process.

儿科急诊室护理点超声认证的特点。
目的:目前尚不清楚哪些儿科急诊科 (PED) 具有床旁超声 (POCUS) 资格认证流程,也不清楚该流程是否符合专家指南。我们的目标是描述活跃于儿科急诊医学 POCUS (P2) 网络的各家 PED 的正规化 POCUS 资格认证流程:方法:根据国家推荐的认证指南制定了一项调查。这份匿名调查寄给了由 230 多名参与儿科 POCUS 的成员组成的 P2 网络。调查结果:共有 36 名 PED 进行了回复:共有 36 个 PED 对调查做出了回应。所有科室都有一名教员负责维护资格认证流程,所有教员都接受过 POCUS 教育;88.6% 的教育为定期授课或床边教学。80.6% 的 PED 有内部认证教员的程序。一些 PED 提供 POCUS 保护教育,但 44.8% 的 PED 没有结论:在接受调查的 PED 中,POCUS 资源和认证内容缺乏标准化。激励措施可能有利于提高认证师资水平和规范认证流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信