Association between baseline insulin resistance and hospital mortality in moderate-to-severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients without diabetes mellitus: An observational study.

Q3 Medicine
Tazeen Khan, Shilpa Naagar, Parvathy R Nair, Damarla Haritha, Preeti Yadav, Sudip Kumar Datta, Sulagna Bhattacharjee, Yashdeep Gupta, Dalim Kumar Baidya, Rahul Kumar Anand, Bikash Ranjan Ray, Shiba Ansari, Rajeshwari Subramaniam, Souvik Maitra
{"title":"Association between baseline insulin resistance and hospital mortality in moderate-to-severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients without diabetes mellitus: An observational study.","authors":"Tazeen Khan, Shilpa Naagar, Parvathy R Nair, Damarla Haritha, Preeti Yadav, Sudip Kumar Datta, Sulagna Bhattacharjee, Yashdeep Gupta, Dalim Kumar Baidya, Rahul Kumar Anand, Bikash Ranjan Ray, Shiba Ansari, Rajeshwari Subramaniam, Souvik Maitra","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_41_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insulin resistance is often implicated as a risk factor of cell-mediated immune dysfunction in sepsis patients and results in poor clinical outcome. However, it is unclear whether early insulin resistance is contributory to T-cell dysfunction and poor clinical outcome in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with moderate-to-severe or critically ill COVID-19 infection were included in this study. Serum samples were collected at the time of diagnosis for fasting plasma glucose, serum insulin, serum cortisol, and serum glucagon measurements, and the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) score was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty-six subjects with a mean (standard deviation) age of 49.6 (16.3) years were recruited in this study, and 62.4% (78 of 125 patients) were male. HOMA-IR was a predictor of inhospital mortality with the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.61 [0.49-0.73]). With a cutoff value of 1.91, sensitivity was 75.5% and specificity was 45.2%. Higher serum insulin was associated with higher survival with AUROC (95% CI) of 0.65 (0.53-0.76), and the best cutoff was 7.15, with a sensitivity and specificity of 62.1% and 64.5%. Serum cortisol was also a predictor of inhospital mortality with an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.67 (0.56-0.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An independent association between baseline serum cortisol and poor outcome in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients was observed. Hyperglycemia and HOMA-IR can also predict poor outcome in these patients with some accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"26-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_41_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Insulin resistance is often implicated as a risk factor of cell-mediated immune dysfunction in sepsis patients and results in poor clinical outcome. However, it is unclear whether early insulin resistance is contributory to T-cell dysfunction and poor clinical outcome in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

Methods: Adult patients with moderate-to-severe or critically ill COVID-19 infection were included in this study. Serum samples were collected at the time of diagnosis for fasting plasma glucose, serum insulin, serum cortisol, and serum glucagon measurements, and the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) score was calculated.

Results: One hundred and twenty-six subjects with a mean (standard deviation) age of 49.6 (16.3) years were recruited in this study, and 62.4% (78 of 125 patients) were male. HOMA-IR was a predictor of inhospital mortality with the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) (95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.61 [0.49-0.73]). With a cutoff value of 1.91, sensitivity was 75.5% and specificity was 45.2%. Higher serum insulin was associated with higher survival with AUROC (95% CI) of 0.65 (0.53-0.76), and the best cutoff was 7.15, with a sensitivity and specificity of 62.1% and 64.5%. Serum cortisol was also a predictor of inhospital mortality with an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.67 (0.56-0.77).

Conclusion: An independent association between baseline serum cortisol and poor outcome in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients was observed. Hyperglycemia and HOMA-IR can also predict poor outcome in these patients with some accuracy.

中重度冠状病毒病 2019 年无糖尿病患者基线胰岛素抵抗与住院死亡率之间的关系:一项观察性研究。
背景:胰岛素抵抗通常被认为是败血症患者细胞介导的免疫功能障碍的危险因素,并导致不良的临床预后。然而,冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)患者的早期胰岛素抵抗是否会导致 T 细胞功能障碍和不良临床预后,目前尚不清楚:本研究纳入了感染COVID-19的中重度或重症成人患者。在确诊时采集血清样本,测量空腹血浆葡萄糖、血清胰岛素、血清皮质醇和血清胰高血糖素,并计算胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)得分:本研究共招募了 126 名受试者,平均(标准差)年龄为 49.6(16.3)岁,其中 62.4% (125 名患者中的 78 名)为男性。HOMA-IR 是预测住院死亡率的指标,其接收者操作特征曲线下面积 (AUROC) 为 0.61 [0.49-0.73] (95% 置信区间 [CI])。截断值为 1.91 时,敏感性为 75.5%,特异性为 45.2%。血清胰岛素越高,存活率越高,其AUROC(95% CI)为0.65(0.53-0.76),最佳临界值为7.15,灵敏度和特异度分别为62.1%和64.5%。血清皮质醇也是院内死亡率的预测因子,其AUROC(95% CI)为0.67(0.56-0.77):结论:基线血清皮质醇与中重度 COVID-19 患者的不良预后之间存在独立关联。高血糖和 HOMA-IR 也能在一定程度上准确预测这些患者的不良预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信