Guideline Adherence as an Indicator of PET Scan Overuse in an Italian Teaching Hospital: An Observational Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Giuseppe Lucio Cascini, Marianna Mauro, Barbara Catalfamo, Monica Giancotti, Roberta Muraca
{"title":"Guideline Adherence as an Indicator of PET Scan Overuse in an Italian Teaching Hospital: An Observational Study.","authors":"Giuseppe Lucio Cascini, Marianna Mauro, Barbara Catalfamo, Monica Giancotti, Roberta Muraca","doi":"10.2174/0118744710290906240408094829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence of inappropriate overuse and underuse of medical procedures has been documented in modern healthcare systems around the world. Excessive use of health services can contribute to a rapid increase in healthcare costs and harm the patient physically and psychologically; conversely, underuse can lead to the inability to provide effective treatments when clinically indicated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study's aim is twofold: a) to measure the appropriateness of PET prescription in a cohort of patients, offering empirical evidence of overuse of health care services; b) to evaluate how the overuse of PET could affect public health expenditure and, consequently, the system's financial sustainability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this observational study, we have analyzed prospectively and retrospectively health patient records who underwent 18F-FDG PET/TC scan at the Nuclear Medicine Department of the University Hospital Mater Domini in Catanzaro (Italy) from 29/09/2022 to 10/02/2023. Patients' diagnostic questions have been defined as appropriate, not completely appropriate and completely inappropriate according to the 18F-FDG PET/CT recommendations defined by the \"Conditions of Supply and Indications of Prescriptive Appropriateness of Italian NHS (National Health Systems)\" published in the Official Gazette no. 15 of 20 January 2016 (Decree 9 December 2015) and by the AIMN (Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We gathered data from 500 oncological patients (242 males and 258 females). The results show that 423/500 of patients' prescriptions were appropriate, while 77/500 of patients' prescriptions were completely inappropriate (63/77) or not completely appropriate (14/77).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Analysis showed a not complete adherence to national guidelines and no shared decision-making approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":10991,"journal":{"name":"Current radiopharmaceuticals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current radiopharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118744710290906240408094829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence of inappropriate overuse and underuse of medical procedures has been documented in modern healthcare systems around the world. Excessive use of health services can contribute to a rapid increase in healthcare costs and harm the patient physically and psychologically; conversely, underuse can lead to the inability to provide effective treatments when clinically indicated.

Objective: The study's aim is twofold: a) to measure the appropriateness of PET prescription in a cohort of patients, offering empirical evidence of overuse of health care services; b) to evaluate how the overuse of PET could affect public health expenditure and, consequently, the system's financial sustainability.

Methods: In this observational study, we have analyzed prospectively and retrospectively health patient records who underwent 18F-FDG PET/TC scan at the Nuclear Medicine Department of the University Hospital Mater Domini in Catanzaro (Italy) from 29/09/2022 to 10/02/2023. Patients' diagnostic questions have been defined as appropriate, not completely appropriate and completely inappropriate according to the 18F-FDG PET/CT recommendations defined by the "Conditions of Supply and Indications of Prescriptive Appropriateness of Italian NHS (National Health Systems)" published in the Official Gazette no. 15 of 20 January 2016 (Decree 9 December 2015) and by the AIMN (Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine) guidelines.

Results: We gathered data from 500 oncological patients (242 males and 258 females). The results show that 423/500 of patients' prescriptions were appropriate, while 77/500 of patients' prescriptions were completely inappropriate (63/77) or not completely appropriate (14/77).

Conclusion: Analysis showed a not complete adherence to national guidelines and no shared decision-making approach.

意大利一家教学医院将遵守指南作为 PET 扫描过度使用的指标:一项观察性研究。
背景:在世界各地的现代医疗保健系统中,都有不适当地过度使用和使用不足医疗程序的证据。过度使用医疗服务会导致医疗成本迅速增加,并对患者的身心造成伤害;反之,使用不足则会导致无法根据临床需要提供有效的治疗:本研究有两个目的:a) 测量一组患者 PET 处方的适当性,提供过度使用医疗服务的实证证据;b) 评估过度使用 PET 如何影响公共卫生支出,进而影响系统的财务可持续性:在这项观察性研究中,我们对 2022 年 9 月 29 日至 2023 年 2 月 10 日期间在卡坦扎罗(意大利)多米尼加母校大学医院核医学科接受 18F-FDG PET/TC 扫描的健康患者记录进行了前瞻性和回顾性分析。根据 2016 年 1 月 20 日第 15 号《官方公报》中公布的 "意大利 NHS(国家卫生系统)的供应条件和处方适宜性指标 "所定义的 18F-FDG PET/TC 建议,患者的诊断问题被定义为适宜、不完全适宜和完全不适宜。结果:我们收集了 500 名肿瘤患者(男性 242 人,女性 258 人)的数据。结果显示,423/500 例患者的处方是合适的,而 77/500 例患者的处方完全不合适(63/77)或不完全合适(14/77):结论:分析表明,国家指导方针没有得到完全遵守,也没有采取共同决策的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current radiopharmaceuticals
Current radiopharmaceuticals PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信