Effectiveness of the static progressive Joint Active System splint in improving upper extremity joint stiffness

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Kobi Steinberg, Danit Langer, Hanna Melchior, Joshua A. Cohen, Gershon Zinger
{"title":"Effectiveness of the static progressive Joint Active System splint in improving upper extremity joint stiffness","authors":"Kobi Steinberg,&nbsp;Danit Langer,&nbsp;Hanna Melchior,&nbsp;Joshua A. Cohen,&nbsp;Gershon Zinger","doi":"10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Injuries to the upper extremity often result in stiffness. The joint capsule may lose its elastic properties, limiting motion. Most modalities for increasing motion are based on capsule stretching, and usually involve physical or occupational therapy. We tested the hypothesis that the Joint Active System static-progressive splint is helpful in increasing range of motion in stiff joints after failure of other treatments.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Candidates for the Joint Active System splint were mostly patients with upper extremity trauma that required surgery, if they plateaued after therapy but still had stiffness. A retrospective review was performed of all patients from 2015 to 2019 that met our inclusion criteria. Etiologies of stiffness and patient demographics were documented. Range of motion was recorded before and after treatment and, when available, functional scores were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-four patients were treated with the Joint Active System splint; 5 were excluded, leaving 39 for analysis: 15 elbow, 14 wrist and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints. All patients had received therapy before using the Joint Active System and 11 had tried a dynamic splint in addition to therapy. All joints showed significant improvement in motion after treatment: from 66.5° to 95.7° in the elbow, 63.5° to 81.1° in the wrist and 33.2° to 51.8° in the proximal interphalangeal joint. When functional scores were available before and after treatment, there was significant improvement for both elbow and wrist. Even when the Joint Active System was started many months after injury, it was effective.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite reaching a plateau with therapy, the Joint Active System static-progressive splint is effective in improving range of motion in elbow, wrist and finger joints with stiffness following injury or surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Type of study</h3><p>Retrospective case series.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Therapeutic, level IV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54301,"journal":{"name":"Hand Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"43 3","pages":"Article 101710"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468122924000999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Injuries to the upper extremity often result in stiffness. The joint capsule may lose its elastic properties, limiting motion. Most modalities for increasing motion are based on capsule stretching, and usually involve physical or occupational therapy. We tested the hypothesis that the Joint Active System static-progressive splint is helpful in increasing range of motion in stiff joints after failure of other treatments.

Methods

Candidates for the Joint Active System splint were mostly patients with upper extremity trauma that required surgery, if they plateaued after therapy but still had stiffness. A retrospective review was performed of all patients from 2015 to 2019 that met our inclusion criteria. Etiologies of stiffness and patient demographics were documented. Range of motion was recorded before and after treatment and, when available, functional scores were calculated.

Results

Forty-four patients were treated with the Joint Active System splint; 5 were excluded, leaving 39 for analysis: 15 elbow, 14 wrist and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints. All patients had received therapy before using the Joint Active System and 11 had tried a dynamic splint in addition to therapy. All joints showed significant improvement in motion after treatment: from 66.5° to 95.7° in the elbow, 63.5° to 81.1° in the wrist and 33.2° to 51.8° in the proximal interphalangeal joint. When functional scores were available before and after treatment, there was significant improvement for both elbow and wrist. Even when the Joint Active System was started many months after injury, it was effective.

Conclusions

Despite reaching a plateau with therapy, the Joint Active System static-progressive splint is effective in improving range of motion in elbow, wrist and finger joints with stiffness following injury or surgery.

Type of study

Retrospective case series.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic, level IV.

静态渐进式关节活动系统夹板对改善上肢关节僵硬的效果。
目的:上肢受伤通常会导致僵硬。关节囊可能会失去弹性,从而限制运动。大多数增加关节活动的方法都是基于关节囊的拉伸,通常涉及物理或职业疗法。我们测试了一项假设,即关节活动系统静态渐进夹板有助于在其他疗法失败后增加僵硬关节的活动范围:关节活动系统夹板的适用对象主要是需要手术治疗的上肢创伤患者,如果他们在接受治疗后仍有僵硬症状。我们对 2015-2019 年期间符合纳入标准的所有患者进行了回顾性审查。记录了僵硬的病因和患者的人口统计学特征。记录了治疗前后的活动范围,并计算了可用的功能评分:44名患者接受了关节活动系统夹板治疗;5名患者被排除在外,剩下39名患者接受了分析:15名肘关节患者、14名腕关节患者和10名近端指间关节患者。所有患者在使用关节活动系统之前都接受过治疗,11 名患者在接受治疗的同时还尝试了动态夹板。治疗后,所有关节的活动度都有明显改善:肘关节从 66.5 °增至 95.7 °,腕关节从 63.5 °增至 81.1 °,近端指间关节从 33.2 °增至 51.8 °。根据治疗前后的功能评分,肘关节和腕关节的功能均有明显改善。即使在受伤数月后才开始使用关节活性系统,效果也很好:尽管在治疗过程中会出现停滞,但关节活动系统静态渐进夹板能有效改善受伤或手术后僵硬的肘关节、腕关节和手指关节的活动范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
27.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the French, Belgian and Swiss Societies for Surgery of the Hand, as well as of the French Society of Rehabilitation of the Hand & Upper Limb, ''Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation'' - formerly named "Chirurgie de la Main" - publishes original articles, literature reviews, technical notes, and clinical cases. It is indexed in the main international databases (including Medline). Initially a platform for French-speaking hand surgeons, the journal will now publish its articles in English to disseminate its author''s scientific findings more widely. The journal also includes a biannual supplement in French, the monograph of the French Society for Surgery of the Hand, where comprehensive reviews in the fields of hand, peripheral nerve and upper limb surgery are presented. Organe officiel de la Société française de chirurgie de la main, de la Société française de Rééducation de la main (SFRM-GEMMSOR), de la Société suisse de chirurgie de la main et du Belgian Hand Group, indexée dans les grandes bases de données internationales (Medline, Embase, Pascal, Scopus), Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation - anciennement titrée Chirurgie de la main - publie des articles originaux, des revues de la littérature, des notes techniques, des cas clinique. Initialement plateforme d''expression francophone de la spécialité, la revue s''oriente désormais vers l''anglais pour devenir une référence scientifique et de formation de la spécialité en France et en Europe. Avec 6 publications en anglais par an, la revue comprend également un supplément biannuel, la monographie du GEM, où sont présentées en français, des mises au point complètes dans les domaines de la chirurgie de la main, des nerfs périphériques et du membre supérieur.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信