Efficacy of combination therapy tadalafil plus tamsulosin in ureteral stents-related symptoms relief.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-20 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2023.66
Ihor Komisarenko, Oleg Banyra, Oleg Nikitin, Yaroslav Klymenko, Mykola Chaplia, Andrii Borzhievskyy
{"title":"Efficacy of combination therapy tadalafil plus tamsulosin in ureteral stents-related symptoms relief.","authors":"Ihor Komisarenko, Oleg Banyra, Oleg Nikitin, Yaroslav Klymenko, Mykola Chaplia, Andrii Borzhievskyy","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2023.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ureteral stents-related symptoms (USRs) are the common complications of ureteral stenting. Tamsulosin a selective alpha-1 blocker and Tadalafil a PDE-5 inhibitor are one of drugs have been used for USRs relief. In this study we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy Tamsulosin+Tadalafil for treating USRs comparing it with the efficacy of either Tamsulosin or Tadalafil monotherapies.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>279 patients with indwelled unilateral ureteral stents were randomized to Tamsulosin 0.4 mg + Tadalafil 5 mg once a day (Group 1, n = 67), Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once a day (Group 2, n = 71), Tadalafil 5 mg once a day (Group 3, n = 69) and Placebo once a day (Group 4, n = 72). USRs severity was registered and calculated by using the Ureteral Symptoms Score Questionnaire (USSQ) at the 14<sup>th</sup> day of treatment. Side-effects and total analgesic use were recorded and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the endpoint in patients with unilateral ureteral stents the combination therapy Tamsulosin + Tadalafil led to statistically lower intensity of urinary symptoms comparing with Tamsulosin (15.2 ±4.3 vs 21.8±3.6, p = 0.0003) or Tadalafil (15.2 ±4.3 vs 20.6 ±2.8, p = 0.0004) monotherapy. All groups of treatment demonstrated significant relief of USRs comparing with Placebo mostly beneficial in the combined therapy group. Body pain and analgesic need in Group 1 was lower than in Groups 2, 3 or 4. Side-effects were registered rarely without statistical differences in frequency between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combination therapy with Tamsulosin + Tadalafil is an effective and safe option that achieves the statistically more significant relief of USRs comparing with Tadalafil or Tamsulosin monotherapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"111-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2023.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteral stents-related symptoms (USRs) are the common complications of ureteral stenting. Tamsulosin a selective alpha-1 blocker and Tadalafil a PDE-5 inhibitor are one of drugs have been used for USRs relief. In this study we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy Tamsulosin+Tadalafil for treating USRs comparing it with the efficacy of either Tamsulosin or Tadalafil monotherapies.

Material and methods: 279 patients with indwelled unilateral ureteral stents were randomized to Tamsulosin 0.4 mg + Tadalafil 5 mg once a day (Group 1, n = 67), Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once a day (Group 2, n = 71), Tadalafil 5 mg once a day (Group 3, n = 69) and Placebo once a day (Group 4, n = 72). USRs severity was registered and calculated by using the Ureteral Symptoms Score Questionnaire (USSQ) at the 14th day of treatment. Side-effects and total analgesic use were recorded and compared.

Results: At the endpoint in patients with unilateral ureteral stents the combination therapy Tamsulosin + Tadalafil led to statistically lower intensity of urinary symptoms comparing with Tamsulosin (15.2 ±4.3 vs 21.8±3.6, p = 0.0003) or Tadalafil (15.2 ±4.3 vs 20.6 ±2.8, p = 0.0004) monotherapy. All groups of treatment demonstrated significant relief of USRs comparing with Placebo mostly beneficial in the combined therapy group. Body pain and analgesic need in Group 1 was lower than in Groups 2, 3 or 4. Side-effects were registered rarely without statistical differences in frequency between groups.

Conclusions: Combination therapy with Tamsulosin + Tadalafil is an effective and safe option that achieves the statistically more significant relief of USRs comparing with Tadalafil or Tamsulosin monotherapies.

他达拉非加坦索罗辛联合疗法对缓解输尿管支架相关症状的疗效。
导言:输尿管支架相关症状(USRs)是输尿管支架植入术的常见并发症。选择性α-1受体阻滞剂坦索罗辛(Tamsulosin)和PDE-5抑制剂他达拉非(Tadalafil)是缓解输尿管支架相关症状的药物之一。本研究旨在评估坦索罗辛+他达拉非联合疗法治疗 USR 的有效性和安全性,并与坦索罗辛或他达拉非单一疗法的疗效进行比较。材料和方法:279 名单侧留置输尿管支架的患者被随机分为坦索罗辛 0.4 毫克+他达拉非 5 毫克每天一次(第 1 组,n = 67)、坦索罗辛 0.4 毫克每天一次(第 2 组,n = 71)、他达拉非 5 毫克每天一次(第 3 组,n = 69)和安慰剂每天一次(第 4 组,n = 72)。在治疗的第14天,使用输尿管症状评分问卷(USSQ)登记并计算USRs的严重程度。对副作用和镇痛剂总用量进行了记录和比较:结果:在单侧输尿管支架患者的终点,坦索罗辛+他达拉非联合疗法与坦索罗辛(15.2 ±4.3 vs 21.8±3.6,p = 0.0003)或他达拉非(15.2 ±4.3 vs 20.6 ±2.8,p = 0.0004)单药疗法相比,排尿症状强度明显降低。与安慰剂相比,所有治疗组的 USR 均有明显缓解,其中以联合治疗组最为明显。第 1 组的身体疼痛和镇痛需求低于第 2、3 或 4 组。副作用极少,组间频率无统计学差异:结论:与他达拉非或坦索罗辛单一疗法相比,坦索罗辛+他达拉非联合疗法是一种有效而安全的选择,能在统计学上更显著地缓解USR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信