Lung (extracorporeal CO2 removal) and renal (continuous renal replacement therapy) support: the role of ultraprotective strategy in Covid 19 and non-Covid 19 ARDS. A case-control study.

Daniela Pasero, Laura Pistidda, Davide Piredda, Corrado Liperi, Andrea Cossu, Raffaella Esposito, Angela Muroni, Cristiano Mereu, Carlino Rum, Gian Pietro Branca, Franco Mulas, Mariangela Puci, Giovanni Sotgiu, Pierpaolo Terragni
{"title":"Lung (extracorporeal CO<sub>2</sub> removal) and renal (continuous renal replacement therapy) support: the role of ultraprotective strategy in Covid 19 and non-Covid 19 ARDS. A case-control study.","authors":"Daniela Pasero, Laura Pistidda, Davide Piredda, Corrado Liperi, Andrea Cossu, Raffaella Esposito, Angela Muroni, Cristiano Mereu, Carlino Rum, Gian Pietro Branca, Franco Mulas, Mariangela Puci, Giovanni Sotgiu, Pierpaolo Terragni","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00164-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preliminary studies suggest that moderate ARDS and acute renal failure might benefit from extracorporeal CO<sub>2</sub> removal (ECCO<sub>2</sub>R) coupled with CRRT. However, evidence is limited and potential for this coupled treatment may need to be explored. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a protective driving pressure was obtained applying low-flow ECCO<sub>2-</sub>R plus CRRT in patients affected by moderate ARDS with COVID-19 compared to an historical group without COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control study has been conducted comparing a group of consecutive moderate ARDS patients presenting AKI and affected by COVID-19, who needed low-flow ECCO<sub>2-</sub>R plus CRRT to achieve an ultra-protective ventilatory strategy, with historical group without COVID-19 that matched for clinical presentation and underwent the same ultra-protective treatment. V<sub>T</sub> was set at 6 mL/kg predicted body weight then ECCO<sub>2</sub>R was assessed to facilitate ultra-protective low V<sub>T</sub> ventilation to preserve safe Pplat and low driving pressure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ECCO<sub>2</sub>R+CRRT reduced the driving pressure from 17 (14-18) to 11.5 (10-15) cmH<sub>2</sub>O (p<0.0004) in the fourteen ARDS patients by decreasing V<sub>T</sub> from 6.7 ml/kg PBW (6.1-6.9) to 5.1 (4.2-5.6) after 1 hour (p <0.0001). In the ARDS patients with COVID-19, the driving pressure reduction was more effective from baseline 18 (14-24) cmH<sub>2</sub>O to 11 (10-15) cmH<sub>2</sub>O (p<0.004), compared to the control group from 15 (13-17) to 12(10-16) cmH<sub>2</sub>O (p< 0.03), after one hour. ECCO<sub>2</sub>R+CRRT did not affected 28 days mortality in the two groups, while we observed a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (19 {7-29} vs 24 {22-38} days; p=0.24) and ICU length of stay (19 {7-29} vs 24 {22-78} days; p=0.25) in moderate ARDS patients with COVID-19 compared to control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In moderate ARDS patients with or without COVID-19 disease, ECCO<sub>2</sub>R+CRRT may be and effective supportive treatment to reach protective values of driving pressure unless severe oxygenation defects arise requiring ECMO therapy initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11055375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00164-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preliminary studies suggest that moderate ARDS and acute renal failure might benefit from extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) coupled with CRRT. However, evidence is limited and potential for this coupled treatment may need to be explored. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a protective driving pressure was obtained applying low-flow ECCO2-R plus CRRT in patients affected by moderate ARDS with COVID-19 compared to an historical group without COVID-19.

Methods: A case-control study has been conducted comparing a group of consecutive moderate ARDS patients presenting AKI and affected by COVID-19, who needed low-flow ECCO2-R plus CRRT to achieve an ultra-protective ventilatory strategy, with historical group without COVID-19 that matched for clinical presentation and underwent the same ultra-protective treatment. VT was set at 6 mL/kg predicted body weight then ECCO2R was assessed to facilitate ultra-protective low VT ventilation to preserve safe Pplat and low driving pressure.

Results: ECCO2R+CRRT reduced the driving pressure from 17 (14-18) to 11.5 (10-15) cmH2O (p<0.0004) in the fourteen ARDS patients by decreasing VT from 6.7 ml/kg PBW (6.1-6.9) to 5.1 (4.2-5.6) after 1 hour (p <0.0001). In the ARDS patients with COVID-19, the driving pressure reduction was more effective from baseline 18 (14-24) cmH2O to 11 (10-15) cmH2O (p<0.004), compared to the control group from 15 (13-17) to 12(10-16) cmH2O (p< 0.03), after one hour. ECCO2R+CRRT did not affected 28 days mortality in the two groups, while we observed a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (19 {7-29} vs 24 {22-38} days; p=0.24) and ICU length of stay (19 {7-29} vs 24 {22-78} days; p=0.25) in moderate ARDS patients with COVID-19 compared to control group.

Conclusions: In moderate ARDS patients with or without COVID-19 disease, ECCO2R+CRRT may be and effective supportive treatment to reach protective values of driving pressure unless severe oxygenation defects arise requiring ECMO therapy initiation.

肺(体外二氧化碳清除)和肾(持续肾替代疗法)支持:超保护策略在 Covid 19 和非 Covid 19 ARDS 中的作用。病例对照研究。
背景:初步研究表明,中度 ARDS 和急性肾衰竭患者可能会从体外二氧化碳排出术(ECCO2R)与 CRRT 的结合治疗中获益。然而,相关证据还很有限,这种联合治疗的潜力还有待挖掘。本研究的目的是评估与未使用 COVID-19 的历史组相比,使用低流量 ECCO2-R 加 CRRT 是否能为患有中度 ARDS 的 COVID-19 患者提供保护性驱动压力:方法: 我们进行了一项病例对照研究,将一组出现 AKI 并受 COVID-19 影响的连续中度 ARDS 患者(他们需要低流量 ECCO2-R 加 CRRT 以实现超保护通气策略)与无 COVID-19 的历史病例组进行了比较,两组患者的临床表现一致,并接受了相同的超保护治疗。VT 设定为 6 mL/kg 预测体重,然后评估 ECCO2R,以促进超保护性低 VT 通气,保持安全的 Pplat 和低驱动压力:结果:ECCO2R+CRRT 在 1 小时后将驱动压力从 17 (14-18) cmH2O 降至 11.5 (10-15) cmH2O(pT 从 6.7 毫升/千克预测体重 (6.1-6.9) 降至 5.1 (4.2-5.6) cmH2O,p 2O 降至 11 (10-15) cmH2O(p2O,p< 0.03)。与对照组相比,我们观察到使用 COVID-19 的中度 ARDS 患者的机械通气时间(19 {7-29} 天 vs 24 {22-38} 天;p=0.24)和重症监护室住院时间(19 {7-29} 天 vs 24 {22-78} 天;p=0.25)更短:结论:对于患有或不患有 COVID-19 病症的中度 ARDS 患者,ECCO2R+CRRT 可能是一种有效的支持性治疗方法,可使驱动压达到保护值,除非出现严重的氧合缺陷,需要启动 ECMO 治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信