Influence of intercostal muscles contraction on sonographic evaluation of lung sliding: a physiological study on healthy subjects.

Daniele Guerino Biasucci, Alessandro Cina, Claudio Sandroni, Umberto Moscato, Mario Dauri, Luigi Vetrugno, Franco Cavaliere
{"title":"Influence of intercostal muscles contraction on sonographic evaluation of lung sliding: a physiological study on healthy subjects.","authors":"Daniele Guerino Biasucci, Alessandro Cina, Claudio Sandroni, Umberto Moscato, Mario Dauri, Luigi Vetrugno, Franco Cavaliere","doi":"10.1186/s44158-024-00168-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the following: (a) effects of intercostal muscle contraction on sonographic assessment of lung sliding and (b) inter-rater and intra-observer agreement on sonographic detection of lung sliding and lung pulse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Valsalva and Muller maneuvers as experimental models in which closed glottis and clipped nose prevent air from entering the lungs, despite sustained intercostal muscles contraction. Twenty-one healthy volunteers underwent bilateral lung ultrasound during tidal breathing, apnea, hyperventilation, and Muller and Valsalva maneuvers. The same expert recorded 420 B-mode clips and 420 M-mode images, independently evaluated for the presence or absence of lung sliding and lung pulse by three raters unaware of the respiratory activity corresponding to each imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During Muller and Valsalva maneuvers, lung sliding was certainly recognized in up to 73.0% and up to 68.7% of imaging, respectively, with a slight to fair inter-rater agreement for Muller maneuver and slight to moderate for Valsalva. Lung sliding was unrecognized in up to 42.0% of tidal breathing imaging, and up to 12.5% of hyperventilation imaging, with a slight to fair inter-rater agreement for both. During apnea, interpretation errors for sliding were irrelevant and inter-rater agreement moderate to perfect. Even if intra-observer agreement varied among raters and throughout respiratory patterns, we found it to be higher than inter-rater reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intercostal muscles contraction produces sonographic artifacts that may simulate lung sliding. Clinical studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. We found slight to moderate inter-rater agreement and globally moderate to almost perfect intra-observer agreement for lung sliding and lung pulse.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov registration number. NCT02386696.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"4 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11075244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00168-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the following: (a) effects of intercostal muscle contraction on sonographic assessment of lung sliding and (b) inter-rater and intra-observer agreement on sonographic detection of lung sliding and lung pulse.

Methods: We used Valsalva and Muller maneuvers as experimental models in which closed glottis and clipped nose prevent air from entering the lungs, despite sustained intercostal muscles contraction. Twenty-one healthy volunteers underwent bilateral lung ultrasound during tidal breathing, apnea, hyperventilation, and Muller and Valsalva maneuvers. The same expert recorded 420 B-mode clips and 420 M-mode images, independently evaluated for the presence or absence of lung sliding and lung pulse by three raters unaware of the respiratory activity corresponding to each imaging.

Results: During Muller and Valsalva maneuvers, lung sliding was certainly recognized in up to 73.0% and up to 68.7% of imaging, respectively, with a slight to fair inter-rater agreement for Muller maneuver and slight to moderate for Valsalva. Lung sliding was unrecognized in up to 42.0% of tidal breathing imaging, and up to 12.5% of hyperventilation imaging, with a slight to fair inter-rater agreement for both. During apnea, interpretation errors for sliding were irrelevant and inter-rater agreement moderate to perfect. Even if intra-observer agreement varied among raters and throughout respiratory patterns, we found it to be higher than inter-rater reliability.

Conclusions: Intercostal muscles contraction produces sonographic artifacts that may simulate lung sliding. Clinical studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. We found slight to moderate inter-rater agreement and globally moderate to almost perfect intra-observer agreement for lung sliding and lung pulse.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number. NCT02386696.

肋间肌收缩对肺滑动声学评估的影响:对健康人的生理学研究。
目标:研究以下内容:(a) 肋间肌收缩对肺滑动声像图评估的影响;(b) 观察者之间和观察者内部对肺滑动和肺脉搏声像图检测的一致性:我们使用 Valsalva 和 Muller 动作作为实验模型,在这些模型中,尽管肋间肌持续收缩,但闭合的声门和夹住的鼻子会阻止空气进入肺部。21 名健康志愿者在潮式呼吸、呼吸暂停、过度通气以及穆勒和瓦尔萨尔瓦动作时接受了双侧肺部超声波检查。同一专家记录了 420 个 B 型片段和 420 个 M 型图像,由三名不了解每次成像对应的呼吸活动的评分者独立评估是否存在肺滑动和肺脉冲:在 Muller 和 Valsalva 操作过程中,分别有高达 73.0% 和 68.7% 的成像可确定识别出肺滑动。高达 42.0% 的潮式呼吸成像和高达 12.5% 的过度通气成像未识别出肺滑动,两者的评分者间一致性为轻微到一般。在呼吸暂停期间,滑动的判读误差无关紧要,评分者之间的一致性中等至完美。即使在不同评分者和不同呼吸模式下,观察者内部的一致性有所不同,但我们发现它比评分者之间的可靠性更高:结论:肋间肌收缩产生的声像图伪影可能会模拟肺滑动。临床研究需要证实这一假设。我们发现,在肺滑动和肺脉搏方面,评分者之间的一致性为轻微至中等,观察者内部的一致性为中等至几乎完美:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号:NCT02386696。NCT02386696.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信