Challenges in the Assessment of Medullary Bone Invasion in Oral Cavity Cancers and Its Prognostic Significance.

IF 3.2 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Badrinath Venkatesh, Paromita Roy, Anand Bardia, Indranil Mallick, Sanjoy Chatterjee, Pattatheyil Arun, Anisha Gehani
{"title":"Challenges in the Assessment of Medullary Bone Invasion in Oral Cavity Cancers and Its Prognostic Significance.","authors":"Badrinath Venkatesh, Paromita Roy, Anand Bardia, Indranil Mallick, Sanjoy Chatterjee, Pattatheyil Arun, Anisha Gehani","doi":"10.1007/s12105-024-01642-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As per AJCC 8th edition TNM staging system, bone invasion is a poor prognostic marker that upstages oral cavity squamous carcinoma (OSCC) to pT4a. Cortical erosion alone of bone or tooth socket by a gingival primary is not sufficient to upstage a tumour. The differentiation of cortical erosion from invasion through the cortical bone into the medulla is often challenging, limiting accurate staging. This review aims to assess the difficulties in differentiating cortical erosion from medullary invasion and evaluate the prognostic significance of different patterns of bone involvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of OSCC with primary curative surgery and bone resection treated at a single-center over 10 years, was performed to assess the prognostic significance of bone invasion. Hematoxylin-eosin stained slides of a subset of cases were re-reviewed in a planned manner to assess difficulties in precise categorization (no invasion/erosion/cortical invasion and medullary invasion), evaluate interobserver agreement, and correlate with clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and ninety patients were included, with a median follow-up of 28 months. On univariate analysis, the 3-year local, nodal and distant metastasis control were not significantly different in the 3 groups of no invasion, erosion, and invasion (p = 0.43, 0.47, and 0.47, respectively). Overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 78.1% and disease-free-survival(DFS) was 63.7% in the entire cohort. On univariate analysis, there was significant difference in OS and DFS based on these groups. This did not translate into independent prognostic benefit on multivariable analysis (p = 0.75 and 0.19, respectively). The independent prognostic factors were margin positivity, tumor differentiation, perineural invasion and pathological nodal involvement. Planned re-review of a subset of 202 cases resulted in a change in bone involvement category in 26/202 cases, which was mainly due to difficulty in assessing cortico-medullary junction near the tooth socket and bone fragmentation. The assessment showed moderate to near complete agreement (kappa 0.59-0.82) between 2 observers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that bone involvement is not an independent prognostic marker and there is no specific correlation of medullary invasion with outcome over those that showed cortical erosion. Several factors contribute to difficulties and interobserver variability in assessing bone involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47972,"journal":{"name":"Head & Neck Pathology","volume":"18 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11074064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Neck Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-024-01642-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As per AJCC 8th edition TNM staging system, bone invasion is a poor prognostic marker that upstages oral cavity squamous carcinoma (OSCC) to pT4a. Cortical erosion alone of bone or tooth socket by a gingival primary is not sufficient to upstage a tumour. The differentiation of cortical erosion from invasion through the cortical bone into the medulla is often challenging, limiting accurate staging. This review aims to assess the difficulties in differentiating cortical erosion from medullary invasion and evaluate the prognostic significance of different patterns of bone involvement.

Methods: A retrospective review of OSCC with primary curative surgery and bone resection treated at a single-center over 10 years, was performed to assess the prognostic significance of bone invasion. Hematoxylin-eosin stained slides of a subset of cases were re-reviewed in a planned manner to assess difficulties in precise categorization (no invasion/erosion/cortical invasion and medullary invasion), evaluate interobserver agreement, and correlate with clinical outcome.

Results: Five hundred and ninety patients were included, with a median follow-up of 28 months. On univariate analysis, the 3-year local, nodal and distant metastasis control were not significantly different in the 3 groups of no invasion, erosion, and invasion (p = 0.43, 0.47, and 0.47, respectively). Overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 78.1% and disease-free-survival(DFS) was 63.7% in the entire cohort. On univariate analysis, there was significant difference in OS and DFS based on these groups. This did not translate into independent prognostic benefit on multivariable analysis (p = 0.75 and 0.19, respectively). The independent prognostic factors were margin positivity, tumor differentiation, perineural invasion and pathological nodal involvement. Planned re-review of a subset of 202 cases resulted in a change in bone involvement category in 26/202 cases, which was mainly due to difficulty in assessing cortico-medullary junction near the tooth socket and bone fragmentation. The assessment showed moderate to near complete agreement (kappa 0.59-0.82) between 2 observers.

Conclusion: Our study shows that bone involvement is not an independent prognostic marker and there is no specific correlation of medullary invasion with outcome over those that showed cortical erosion. Several factors contribute to difficulties and interobserver variability in assessing bone involvement.

评估口腔癌髓质骨侵犯的挑战及其预后意义
背景:根据 AJCC 第 8 版 TNM 分期系统,骨侵袭是将口腔鳞状癌(OSCC)升至 pT4a 级的不良预后标志。仅凭牙龈原发癌对骨或牙槽骨的皮质侵蚀不足以将肿瘤升期。将皮质侵蚀与通过皮质骨侵入髓质区分开来往往具有挑战性,从而限制了肿瘤的准确分期。本综述旨在评估区分皮质侵蚀和髓质侵犯的困难,并评估不同骨质受累模式的预后意义:方法:我们对一家中心10年来对OSCC进行原发性根治术和骨切除术的病例进行了回顾性研究,以评估骨侵袭的预后意义。对部分病例的血栓素-伊红染色切片进行了有计划的重新审查,以评估精确分类(无侵犯/侵蚀/皮质侵犯和髓质侵犯)的困难,评估观察者之间的一致性,并将其与临床结果联系起来:共纳入 590 名患者,中位随访时间为 28 个月。经单变量分析,3年的局部、结节和远处转移控制率在无侵袭、侵蚀和侵袭三组中无显著差异(P分别为0.43、0.47和0.47)。整个队列的 3 年总生存率(OS)为 78.1%,无病生存率(DFS)为 63.7%。单变量分析显示,这些组别的 OS 和 DFS 有显著差异。在多变量分析中,这并没有转化为独立的预后获益(P = 0.75 和 0.19)。独立的预后因素是边缘阳性、肿瘤分化、神经周围侵犯和病理结节受累。计划对 202 例病例中的一个子集进行重新审查,结果有 26/202 例病例的骨受累类别发生了变化,这主要是由于难以评估牙槽附近的皮质-髓质交界处和骨破碎。两名观察者之间的评估结果显示出中等至接近完全一致(kappa 0.59-0.82):我们的研究表明,骨质受累并不是一个独立的预后指标,髓质受侵与皮质侵蚀的预后也没有特定的相关性。导致骨受累评估困难和观察者间差异的因素很多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Head & Neck Pathology presents scholarly papers, reviews and symposia that cover the spectrum of human surgical pathology within the anatomic zones of the oral cavity, sinonasal tract, larynx, hypopharynx, salivary gland, ear and temporal bone, and neck. The journal publishes rapid developments in new diagnostic criteria, intraoperative consultation, immunohistochemical studies, molecular techniques, genetic analyses, diagnostic aids, experimental pathology, cytology, radiographic imaging, and application of uniform terminology to allow practitioners to continue to maintain and expand their knowledge in the subspecialty of head and neck pathology. Coverage of practical application to daily clinical practice is supported with proceedings and symposia from international societies and academies devoted to this field. Single-blind peer review The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信