Short-term Comparison of Survivorship and Functional Outcomes for Metaphyseal Cones with Short and Long Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Knee Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1055/a-2315-7778
Nicolas S Piuzzi, Emily L Hampp, Sarah Shi, Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker, Nickelas Huffman, Kevin M Denehy, David C Markel, Daniel D Li, Michael A Mont
{"title":"Short-term Comparison of Survivorship and Functional Outcomes for Metaphyseal Cones with Short and Long Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.","authors":"Nicolas S Piuzzi, Emily L Hampp, Sarah Shi, Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker, Nickelas Huffman, Kevin M Denehy, David C Markel, Daniel D Li, Michael A Mont","doi":"10.1055/a-2315-7778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Printed porous titanium metaphyseal cones have become a mainstay for managing bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). A short or long stem is routinely used when implanting a cone to augment fixation and offload stresses. This retrospective analysis compared the short-term survivorships and functional outcomes for use of a short or long stem with a metaphyseal cone.A total of 179 cases using metaphyseal cones and stems with median follow-up of 1.95 years (interquartile range, 1.00-2.14) were compared based on stem type. There were 55 cases with long stem(s) and 124 cases with short stem(s). Cases with both long and short stems were excluded. Demographics, Kaplan-Meier survivorships, and preoperative and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; 2011 Knee Society Score [KSS] objective knee score, function, and satisfaction scores; EuroQol five-dimension scale; and Short Form Survey Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary scores) were compared using <i>t</i>-tests with a significance level of α = 0.05. There were no significant differences in body mass index (mean ± standard deviation) or sex (men [%]) between the short and long stem cohorts (32.3 ± 5.3, 36.3% and 31.5 ± 5.5, 38.2%, respectively; <i>p</i> > 0.05). Patients who had short stems were younger (65.9 ± 8.8 vs. 69.0 ± 9.4, <i>p</i> = 0.0323).Revision-free survivorship for the femoral or tibial component was 100% for long stems and 98.2% for short stems at 1 and 2 years, respectively (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.6330). The two revisions in the short group were for infection, thus the survivorship for aseptic loosening was 100% at 2 years for both cohorts. There were no significant differences in preoperative or postoperative PROMs.This study demonstrated that highly porous printed metaphyseal cones provided rTKA with excellent early survivorship and similar PROMs whether a short or long stem was used. Additional studies will be needed to discern longer term differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"765-772"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2315-7778","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Printed porous titanium metaphyseal cones have become a mainstay for managing bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). A short or long stem is routinely used when implanting a cone to augment fixation and offload stresses. This retrospective analysis compared the short-term survivorships and functional outcomes for use of a short or long stem with a metaphyseal cone.A total of 179 cases using metaphyseal cones and stems with median follow-up of 1.95 years (interquartile range, 1.00-2.14) were compared based on stem type. There were 55 cases with long stem(s) and 124 cases with short stem(s). Cases with both long and short stems were excluded. Demographics, Kaplan-Meier survivorships, and preoperative and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; 2011 Knee Society Score [KSS] objective knee score, function, and satisfaction scores; EuroQol five-dimension scale; and Short Form Survey Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary scores) were compared using t-tests with a significance level of α = 0.05. There were no significant differences in body mass index (mean ± standard deviation) or sex (men [%]) between the short and long stem cohorts (32.3 ± 5.3, 36.3% and 31.5 ± 5.5, 38.2%, respectively; p > 0.05). Patients who had short stems were younger (65.9 ± 8.8 vs. 69.0 ± 9.4, p = 0.0323).Revision-free survivorship for the femoral or tibial component was 100% for long stems and 98.2% for short stems at 1 and 2 years, respectively (log-rank p = 0.6330). The two revisions in the short group were for infection, thus the survivorship for aseptic loosening was 100% at 2 years for both cohorts. There were no significant differences in preoperative or postoperative PROMs.This study demonstrated that highly porous printed metaphyseal cones provided rTKA with excellent early survivorship and similar PROMs whether a short or long stem was used. Additional studies will be needed to discern longer term differences.

在翻修全膝关节置换术中使用带短柄和长柄的骺锥体的存活率和功能效果的短期比较。
简介:印刷多孔钛骺锥体已成为翻修全膝关节置换术(rTKA)中控制骨质流失的主要方法。在植入锥体时,通常会使用长短柄来增强固定和卸载应力。这项回顾性分析比较了使用骺锥体的短骨柄或长骨柄的短期存活率和功能结果:根据骨干类型比较了179个使用骺锥和骨干的病例,中位随访时间为1.95年(四分位间范围为1.00至2.14年)。其中 55 例使用长柄,124 例使用短柄。同时具有长茎和短茎的病例被排除在外。采用t检验比较了人口统计学、Kaplan-Meier存活率、术前和术后一年的患者报告结果指标(PROMs)[2011年膝关节协会评分(KSS)客观膝关节评分、功能和满意度评分;EuroQol五维量表(EQ5D);以及简表调查(SF12)身体成分汇总(PCS)和精神成分汇总(MCS)评分],显著性水平为α=0.05。在体重指数(BMI)(平均值±标度)或性别[男性(%)]方面,短茎组和长茎组之间没有明显差异(分别为32.3±5.3,36.3%和31.5±5.5,38.2%;P>0.05)。使用短茎的患者更年轻(65.9 ± 8.8 vs. 69.0 ± 9.4,P=0.0323):结果:一年和两年后,股骨或胫骨组件的无翻修存活率长柄组为100%,短柄组为98.2%(log-Rank P=0.6330)。短柄组的两次翻修都是因为感染,因此两组患者两年后的无菌性松动存活率均为100%。术前和术后PROMs无明显差异:这项研究表明,无论使用长茎还是短茎,高多孔印刷骺锥体都能为rTKA提供良好的早期存活率和相似的PROM。还需要进行更多研究,以确定长期差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信