Validity and reliability of the Foot Care Scale for Older Diabetics in Turkish society.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
İsmail Toygar, Güneş Feyizoğlu, Emine Özdemir Aslan, İrem Gül, Öznur Usta Yeşilbalkan
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Foot Care Scale for Older Diabetics in Turkish society.","authors":"İsmail Toygar, Güneş Feyizoğlu, Emine Özdemir Aslan, İrem Gül, Öznur Usta Yeşilbalkan","doi":"10.25270/wmp.23022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older patients with diabetes have behaviors and practices in foot care that differ from those of younger patients. There is a need for a tool to assess the foot care of patients with diabetes who are over the age of 65 years.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the long and short versions of the Foot Care Scale for Older Diabetics (FCS-OD) in Turkish society.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 172 older patients with diabetes participated in the study. Language validity, content validity, construct validity, Cronbach's alpha coefficient value, item-scale correlations, parallel form reliability, and test-retest correlations were used to assess the Turkish version of FCS-OD. A patient identification form, FCS-OD, Diabetic Foot Care Self-Efficacy Scale, and Foot Self-Care Behavior Scale were used for data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Turkish versions of the FCS-OD, both short and long versions, were at acceptable levels regarding their content (content validity index: 0.964, 0.975) and construct (factor loadings > 0.4). Both versions of the scale showed a high level of internal consistency as demonstrated by Cronbach's alpha values (short version, 0.802; long version, 0.905) and item-scale correlations (> 0.3). Both versions of the scale were stable over time and compared to the parallel forms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both versions of the scale were found to be valid and reliable for Turkish society with regard to psychometric properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":23741,"journal":{"name":"Wound management & prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound management & prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/wmp.23022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older patients with diabetes have behaviors and practices in foot care that differ from those of younger patients. There is a need for a tool to assess the foot care of patients with diabetes who are over the age of 65 years.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the long and short versions of the Foot Care Scale for Older Diabetics (FCS-OD) in Turkish society.

Methods: A total of 172 older patients with diabetes participated in the study. Language validity, content validity, construct validity, Cronbach's alpha coefficient value, item-scale correlations, parallel form reliability, and test-retest correlations were used to assess the Turkish version of FCS-OD. A patient identification form, FCS-OD, Diabetic Foot Care Self-Efficacy Scale, and Foot Self-Care Behavior Scale were used for data collection.

Results: Turkish versions of the FCS-OD, both short and long versions, were at acceptable levels regarding their content (content validity index: 0.964, 0.975) and construct (factor loadings > 0.4). Both versions of the scale showed a high level of internal consistency as demonstrated by Cronbach's alpha values (short version, 0.802; long version, 0.905) and item-scale correlations (> 0.3). Both versions of the scale were stable over time and compared to the parallel forms.

Conclusions: Both versions of the scale were found to be valid and reliable for Turkish society with regard to psychometric properties.

土耳其社会老年糖尿病患者足部护理量表的有效性和可靠性。
背景:老年糖尿病患者在足部护理方面的行为和做法与年轻患者不同。目的:本研究旨在评估土耳其社会中长期和短期老年糖尿病患者足部护理量表(FCS-OD)的有效性和可靠性:共有 172 名老年糖尿病患者参与了研究。研究采用语言效度、内容效度、结构效度、克朗巴赫α系数、项目量表相关性、平行形式信度和测试-再测相关性来评估土耳其版 FCS-OD。收集数据时使用了患者身份识别表、FCS-OD、糖尿病足护理自我效能量表和足部自我护理行为量表:土耳其版 FCS-OD 的长短两个版本在内容(内容效度指数:0.964、0.975)和结构(因子载荷大于 0.4)方面都达到了可接受的水平。两个版本的量表都显示出较高的内部一致性,这体现在 Cronbach's alpha 值(短版,0.802;长版,0.905)和项目量表相关性(> 0.3)上。两个版本的量表随着时间的推移以及与平行表格的比较都很稳定:两个版本的量表在心理测量学特性方面对土耳其社会都是有效和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wound management & prevention
Wound management & prevention Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信