Ning Huang, Lixue Chen, Zhiqiang Yan, Lin Zeng, Haining Wang, Hongbin Chi, Jie Qiao
{"title":"Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Versus <i>In vitro</i> Fertilization in Infertile Women with Thyroid Autoimmunity.","authors":"Ning Huang, Lixue Chen, Zhiqiang Yan, Lin Zeng, Haining Wang, Hongbin Chi, Jie Qiao","doi":"10.1089/thy.2023.0676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> It has been reported that intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) may be the preferred fertilization method for women with thyroid autoimmunity (TAI) seeking assisted reproduction. We compared the reproductive outcomes of women with TAI who were treated with ICSI compared with <i>in vitro</i> fertilization (IVF). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this retrospective cohort study, we included women with infertility who were referred to the Reproductive Centre of Peking University Third Hospital for their first IVF/ICSI and embryo transfer (ET) treatment cycle from January 2019 to February 2021. In total, 2171 and 743 women with TAI underwent IVF and ICSI, respectively, while 8702 and 2668 women without TAI underwent IVF and ICSI, respectively. We examined the cumulative live birth rate (primary outcome) from the initiated stimulative cycle as well as the secondary outcomes of fertilization rate, rates of clinical pregnancy, and live birth after the first ET cycle. We compared the reproductive outcomes of women treated with IVF and ICSI according to TAI status. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to adjust for relevant confounders. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Women who underwent ICSI had significantly higher fertilization rates than those who underwent IVF (median [interquartile range]: 0.6 [0.5-0.8] in the TAI-positive and IVF group vs. 0.7 [0.5-0.8] in the TAI-positive and ICSI group vs. 0.6 [0.5-0.8] the TAI-negative and IVF group vs. 0.7 [0.5-0.8] in the TAI-negative and ICSI group, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the rates of cumulative live births, clinical pregnancies, and live births were significantly lower among women with TAI who underwent ICSI than those who underwent IVF (cumulative live birth: 51.8% vs. 47%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.80 [confidence interval, CI: 0.67-0.97]; clinical pregnancy: 43.0% vs. 38.8%, aOR: 0.81 [CI: 0.67-0.97]; live birth: 36.2% vs. 32.4%, aOR: 0.81 [CI: 0.66-0.98]). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> We observed that the use of ICSI in women with TAI was not associated with better assisted reproductive outcomes compared with IVF. Further prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":"764-773"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2023.0676","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: It has been reported that intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) may be the preferred fertilization method for women with thyroid autoimmunity (TAI) seeking assisted reproduction. We compared the reproductive outcomes of women with TAI who were treated with ICSI compared with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included women with infertility who were referred to the Reproductive Centre of Peking University Third Hospital for their first IVF/ICSI and embryo transfer (ET) treatment cycle from January 2019 to February 2021. In total, 2171 and 743 women with TAI underwent IVF and ICSI, respectively, while 8702 and 2668 women without TAI underwent IVF and ICSI, respectively. We examined the cumulative live birth rate (primary outcome) from the initiated stimulative cycle as well as the secondary outcomes of fertilization rate, rates of clinical pregnancy, and live birth after the first ET cycle. We compared the reproductive outcomes of women treated with IVF and ICSI according to TAI status. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to adjust for relevant confounders. Results: Women who underwent ICSI had significantly higher fertilization rates than those who underwent IVF (median [interquartile range]: 0.6 [0.5-0.8] in the TAI-positive and IVF group vs. 0.7 [0.5-0.8] in the TAI-positive and ICSI group vs. 0.6 [0.5-0.8] the TAI-negative and IVF group vs. 0.7 [0.5-0.8] in the TAI-negative and ICSI group, p < 0.001). However, the rates of cumulative live births, clinical pregnancies, and live births were significantly lower among women with TAI who underwent ICSI than those who underwent IVF (cumulative live birth: 51.8% vs. 47%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.80 [confidence interval, CI: 0.67-0.97]; clinical pregnancy: 43.0% vs. 38.8%, aOR: 0.81 [CI: 0.67-0.97]; live birth: 36.2% vs. 32.4%, aOR: 0.81 [CI: 0.66-0.98]). Conclusion: We observed that the use of ICSI in women with TAI was not associated with better assisted reproductive outcomes compared with IVF. Further prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.
期刊介绍:
This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes.
Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.