Ghrelin for Neuroprotection in Post-Cardiac Arrest Coma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sjoukje Nutma, Albertus Beishuizen, Walter M van den Bergh, Norbert A Foudraine, Joost le Feber, P Margreet G Filius, Alexander D Cornet, Job van der Palen, Michel J A M van Putten, Jeannette Hofmeijer
{"title":"Ghrelin for Neuroprotection in Post-Cardiac Arrest Coma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sjoukje Nutma, Albertus Beishuizen, Walter M van den Bergh, Norbert A Foudraine, Joost le Feber, P Margreet G Filius, Alexander D Cornet, Job van der Palen, Michel J A M van Putten, Jeannette Hofmeijer","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates have markedly risen in the last decades, but neurological outcome only improved marginally. Despite research on more than 20 neuroprotective strategies involving patients in comas after cardiac arrest, none have demonstrated unequivocal evidence of efficacy; however, treatment with acyl-ghrelin has shown improved functional and histological brain recovery in experimental models of cardiac arrest and was safe in a wide variety of human study populations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine safety and potential efficacy of intravenous acyl-ghrelin to improve neurological outcome in patients in a coma after cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, Ghrelin Treatment of Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest: A Clinical Trial to Promote Cerebral Recovery (GRECO), was conducted between January 18, 2019, and October 17, 2022. Adult patients 18 years or older who were in a comatose state after cardiac arrest were assessed for eligibility; patients were from 3 intensive care units in the Netherlands. Expected death within 48 hours or unfeasibility of treatment initiation within 12 hours were exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomized to receive intravenous acyl-ghrelin, 600 μg (intervention group), or placebo (control group) within 12 hours after cardiac arrest, continued for 7 days, twice daily, in addition to standard care.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary outcome was the score on the Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) scale at 6 months. Safety outcomes included any serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were mortality and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels on days 1 and 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 783 adult patients in a coma after cardiac arrest were assessed for eligibility, and 160 patients (median [IQR] age, 68 [57-75] years; 120 male [75%]) were enrolled. A total of 81 patients (51%) were assigned to the intervention group, and 79 (49%) were assigned to the control group. The common odds ratio (OR) for any CPC improvement in the intervention group was 1.78 (95% CI, 0.98-3.22; P = .06). This was consistent over all CPC categories. Mean (SD) NSE levels on day 1 after cardiac arrest were significantly lower in the intervention group (34 [6] μg/L vs 56 [13] μg/L; P = .04) and on day 3 (28 [6] μg/L vs 52 [14] μg/L; P = .08). Serious adverse events were comparable in incidence and type between the groups. Mortality was 37% (30 of 81) in the intervention group vs 51% (40 of 79) in the control group (absolute risk reduction, 14%; 95% CI, -2% to 29%; P = .08).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In patients in a coma after cardiac arrest, intravenous treatment with acyl-ghrelin was safe and potentially effective to improve neurological outcome. Phase 3 trials are needed for conclusive evidence.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrialsregister.eu: EUCTR2018-000005-23-NL.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11074931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1088","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates have markedly risen in the last decades, but neurological outcome only improved marginally. Despite research on more than 20 neuroprotective strategies involving patients in comas after cardiac arrest, none have demonstrated unequivocal evidence of efficacy; however, treatment with acyl-ghrelin has shown improved functional and histological brain recovery in experimental models of cardiac arrest and was safe in a wide variety of human study populations.

Objective: To determine safety and potential efficacy of intravenous acyl-ghrelin to improve neurological outcome in patients in a coma after cardiac arrest.

Design, setting, and participants: A phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, Ghrelin Treatment of Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest: A Clinical Trial to Promote Cerebral Recovery (GRECO), was conducted between January 18, 2019, and October 17, 2022. Adult patients 18 years or older who were in a comatose state after cardiac arrest were assessed for eligibility; patients were from 3 intensive care units in the Netherlands. Expected death within 48 hours or unfeasibility of treatment initiation within 12 hours were exclusion criteria.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive intravenous acyl-ghrelin, 600 μg (intervention group), or placebo (control group) within 12 hours after cardiac arrest, continued for 7 days, twice daily, in addition to standard care.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcome was the score on the Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) scale at 6 months. Safety outcomes included any serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were mortality and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels on days 1 and 3.

Results: A total of 783 adult patients in a coma after cardiac arrest were assessed for eligibility, and 160 patients (median [IQR] age, 68 [57-75] years; 120 male [75%]) were enrolled. A total of 81 patients (51%) were assigned to the intervention group, and 79 (49%) were assigned to the control group. The common odds ratio (OR) for any CPC improvement in the intervention group was 1.78 (95% CI, 0.98-3.22; P = .06). This was consistent over all CPC categories. Mean (SD) NSE levels on day 1 after cardiac arrest were significantly lower in the intervention group (34 [6] μg/L vs 56 [13] μg/L; P = .04) and on day 3 (28 [6] μg/L vs 52 [14] μg/L; P = .08). Serious adverse events were comparable in incidence and type between the groups. Mortality was 37% (30 of 81) in the intervention group vs 51% (40 of 79) in the control group (absolute risk reduction, 14%; 95% CI, -2% to 29%; P = .08).

Conclusions and relevance: In patients in a coma after cardiac arrest, intravenous treatment with acyl-ghrelin was safe and potentially effective to improve neurological outcome. Phase 3 trials are needed for conclusive evidence.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrialsregister.eu: EUCTR2018-000005-23-NL.

Ghrelin 对心脏骤停后昏迷患者的神经保护作用:随机临床试验。
重要性:在过去的几十年中,院外心脏骤停患者的存活率显著提高,但神经系统的预后却改善甚微。尽管对 20 多种神经保护策略进行了研究,涉及心脏骤停后昏迷的患者,但没有一种策略能明确证明其疗效;然而,在心脏骤停的实验模型中,使用酰基胃泌素治疗能改善脑功能和组织学恢复,而且在各种人体研究人群中都是安全的:目的:确定静脉注射酰基胃泌素的安全性和潜在疗效,以改善心脏骤停后昏迷患者的神经功能预后:一项名为 "对心脏骤停后昏迷患者的格雷林治疗 "的 2 期、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心、随机临床试验:促进脑恢复的临床试验(GRECO)于 2019 年 1 月 18 日至 2022 年 10 月 17 日期间进行。评估对象为心脏骤停后处于昏迷状态的 18 岁或以上成年患者;患者来自荷兰的 3 个重症监护病房。预计在48小时内死亡或在12小时内无法开始治疗为排除标准:患者在心脏骤停后 12 小时内随机接受 600 μg(干预组)或安慰剂(对照组)静脉注射:主要结果和测量方法:主要结果是6个月时脑功能分类(CPC)量表的评分。安全性结果包括任何严重不良事件。次要结果为第 1 天和第 3 天的死亡率和神经元特异性烯醇化酶 (NSE) 水平:共有 783 名心脏骤停后昏迷的成年患者接受了资格评估,其中 160 名患者(中位数[IQR]年龄为 68 [57-75] 岁;120 名男性[75%])入组。共有 81 名患者(51%)被分配到干预组,79 名患者(49%)被分配到对照组。干预组中任何 CPC 改善的共同几率比 (OR) 为 1.78(95% CI,0.98-3.22;P = .06)。这在所有 CPC 类别中都是一致的。干预组在心脏骤停后第 1 天(34 [6] μg/L vs 56 [13] μg/L;P = .04)和第 3 天(28 [6] μg/L vs 52 [14] μg/L;P = .08)的 NSE 平均(标清)水平显著较低。两组的严重不良事件发生率和类型相当。干预组的死亡率为 37%(81 例中有 30 例),对照组为 51%(79 例中有 40 例)(绝对风险降低 14%;95% CI,-2% 至 29%;P = .08):对于心脏骤停后处于昏迷状态的患者,使用酰基胃泌素进行静脉注射治疗是安全的,而且可能有效改善神经功能预后。需要进行三期试验以获得确凿证据:试验注册:Clinicaltrialsregister.eu:EUCTR2018-000005-23-NL.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信