PERSPECTIVE: A Path to Value-Based Insurance Design for Mental Health Services.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Michael C Freed, Jennifer L Humensky, Patricia A Arean
{"title":"PERSPECTIVE: A Path to Value-Based Insurance Design for Mental Health Services.","authors":"Michael C Freed, Jennifer L Humensky, Patricia A Arean","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aligning cost of mental health care with expected clinical and functional benefits of that care would incentivize the delivery of high value treatments and services. In turn, ineffective or untested care could still be offered but at costs high enough to offset the delivery of high value care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The authors comment on Benson and Fendrick's paper on Value-Based Insurance Design (VBID) for mental health in the September 2023 special issue of this journal. The authors also present a preliminary framework of key ingredients needed to consider VBID for mental health treatments and services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors briefly review current and past efforts to contain costs and improve quality of mental health care, which include (for example) use of carve-out and carve-in programs, evaluation of cost sharing models, impact of accountable care organizations, and studying other benefit designs and impact of federal and state policies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using PTSD as an example, key ingredients of VBID for mental health services were identified and include the following: tools for case identification and monitoring progress over time at the population level; specific treatments and services with evidence of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and health equity; and an approach to document the specific treatment or service was delivered (versus another treatment or service that may lack evidence).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The inability to afford mental health care is a top barrier to treatment seeking. People who do elect to spend time and money on mental health care are further disadvantaged by accessing care that is not well regulated and the quality at best is questionable. VBID could be an important lever for increasing access to and use of high value mental health care. Partnerships among the research, practice, and policy communities can help ensure research solutions meet needs of these two communities.</p><p><strong>Implications for health care: </strong>VBID holds promise to make high value mental health care more affordable while discouraging low value treatments and services.</p><p><strong>Implications for health policies: </strong>While evidence gaps remain, these gaps can be filled concurrently with pursuit of VBID for mental health services.</p><p><strong>Implications for future research: </strong>This paper identifies important research opportunities to help make VBID a reality for mental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11062318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aligning cost of mental health care with expected clinical and functional benefits of that care would incentivize the delivery of high value treatments and services. In turn, ineffective or untested care could still be offered but at costs high enough to offset the delivery of high value care.

Aims: The authors comment on Benson and Fendrick's paper on Value-Based Insurance Design (VBID) for mental health in the September 2023 special issue of this journal. The authors also present a preliminary framework of key ingredients needed to consider VBID for mental health treatments and services.

Methods: The authors briefly review current and past efforts to contain costs and improve quality of mental health care, which include (for example) use of carve-out and carve-in programs, evaluation of cost sharing models, impact of accountable care organizations, and studying other benefit designs and impact of federal and state policies.

Results: Using PTSD as an example, key ingredients of VBID for mental health services were identified and include the following: tools for case identification and monitoring progress over time at the population level; specific treatments and services with evidence of clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and health equity; and an approach to document the specific treatment or service was delivered (versus another treatment or service that may lack evidence).

Discussion: The inability to afford mental health care is a top barrier to treatment seeking. People who do elect to spend time and money on mental health care are further disadvantaged by accessing care that is not well regulated and the quality at best is questionable. VBID could be an important lever for increasing access to and use of high value mental health care. Partnerships among the research, practice, and policy communities can help ensure research solutions meet needs of these two communities.

Implications for health care: VBID holds promise to make high value mental health care more affordable while discouraging low value treatments and services.

Implications for health policies: While evidence gaps remain, these gaps can be filled concurrently with pursuit of VBID for mental health services.

Implications for future research: This paper identifies important research opportunities to help make VBID a reality for mental health care.

PERSPECTIVE: A Path to Value-Based Insurance Design for Mental Health Services.
背景:将心理健康护理的成本与该护理的预期临床和功能效益挂钩,将激励提供高价值的治疗和服务。反过来,无效或未经测试的医疗服务仍可提供,但其成本足以抵消高价值医疗服务的提供。目的:作者对本森和芬德瑞克在本刊 2023 年 9 月特刊上发表的关于心理健康价值型保险设计(VBID)的论文进行了评论。作者还提出了一个初步框架,其中包含了考虑心理健康治疗和服务的 VBID 所需的关键要素:作者简要回顾了当前和过去为控制成本和提高精神卫生保健质量所做的努力,其中包括(例如)使用 "退出 "和 "加入 "计划、成本分担模式评估、责任医疗组织的影响、研究其他福利设计以及联邦和州政策的影响:结果:以创伤后应激障碍为例,确定了心理健康服务 VBID 的关键要素,其中包括以下内容:病例识别工具和在人群层面监测随时间推移的进展情况;具有临床有效性、成本效益和健康公平性证据的特定治疗和服务;记录特定治疗或服务提供情况的方法(相对于可能缺乏证据的其他治疗或服务):无力负担心理健康医疗费用是寻求治疗的首要障碍。而那些选择花费时间和金钱在心理健康护理上的人,则会因为获得的护理没有得到很好的监管,充其量也只是质量有问题的护理而处于更加不利的地位。VBID 可以成为增加获取和使用高价值心理健康护理的重要杠杆。研究、实践和政策团体之间的合作有助于确保研究解决方案满足这两个团体的需求:VBID 有望使高价值的心理健康护理更加经济实惠,同时抑制低价值的治疗和服务:对未来研究的启示:本文指出了重要的研究机会,以帮助实现心理健康服务的 VBID。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics publishes high quality empirical, analytical and methodologic papers focusing on the application of health and economic research and policy analysis in mental health. It offers an international forum to enable the different participants in mental health policy and economics - psychiatrists involved in research and care and other mental health workers, health services researchers, health economists, policy makers, public and private health providers, advocacy groups, and the pharmaceutical industry - to share common information in a common language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信