Effect of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Perceived Exertion During Aerobic Exercise in Eumenorrheic Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Journal of women's & pelvic health physical therapy Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-22
Raul Cosme Ramos Prado, Anthony C Hackney, Rodrigo Silveira, Marcus W Kilpatrick, Monica Yuri Takito, Ricardo Yukio Asano
{"title":"Effect of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Perceived Exertion During Aerobic Exercise in Eumenorrheic Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Raul Cosme Ramos Prado, Anthony C Hackney, Rodrigo Silveira, Marcus W Kilpatrick, Monica Yuri Takito, Ricardo Yukio Asano","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is a readily available and practical tool widely used in exercise science to monitor exercise load, but a rigorous review of the effect of menstrual cycle (MC) phases on RPE within continuous aerobic exercise has not yet been completed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the effects of the MC phase on RPE during aerobic exercise.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search strategy was carried out using the 5 most common scientific databases. While qualitative analyses were performed in all included studies, random effects to standard mean difference were calculated and meta-analysis was performed where possible. This study addresses comparison for RPE at the beginning, middle, and end of the exercise adopting 2 mains analysis. The first adopted early cycle (first session of the cycle) as control compared with the subsequent phases, and the second adopted days 1 to 5 (early follicular) as control compared with the subsequent phases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies (n = 160) were included in the qualitative synthesis. The meta-analysis showed that MC phases did not impact RPE (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current meta-analysis showed that MC does not impact RPE. Although acute RPE is not impacted by MC phases, future studies and practitioners should pay attention to the impact of RPE session by session throughout the MC.</p>","PeriodicalId":519883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's & pelvic health physical therapy","volume":"48 2","pages":"91-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's & pelvic health physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is a readily available and practical tool widely used in exercise science to monitor exercise load, but a rigorous review of the effect of menstrual cycle (MC) phases on RPE within continuous aerobic exercise has not yet been completed.

Objective: This study investigated the effects of the MC phase on RPE during aerobic exercise.

Study design: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: The search strategy was carried out using the 5 most common scientific databases. While qualitative analyses were performed in all included studies, random effects to standard mean difference were calculated and meta-analysis was performed where possible. This study addresses comparison for RPE at the beginning, middle, and end of the exercise adopting 2 mains analysis. The first adopted early cycle (first session of the cycle) as control compared with the subsequent phases, and the second adopted days 1 to 5 (early follicular) as control compared with the subsequent phases.

Results: A total of 17 studies (n = 160) were included in the qualitative synthesis. The meta-analysis showed that MC phases did not impact RPE (P > .05).

Conclusions: The current meta-analysis showed that MC does not impact RPE. Although acute RPE is not impacted by MC phases, future studies and practitioners should pay attention to the impact of RPE session by session throughout the MC.

月经周期阶段对月经过多女性在有氧运动中感知运动量的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:感知用力值(RPE)是运动科学中广泛用于监测运动负荷的现成实用工具,但关于月经周期(MC)阶段对连续有氧运动中RPE的影响的严格审查尚未完成:研究设计:研究设计:这是一项系统回顾和荟萃分析:方法:使用 5 个最常见的科学数据库实施搜索策略。在对所有纳入研究进行定性分析的同时,还计算了随机效应与标准平均差,并在可能的情况下进行了荟萃分析。本研究采用两种主要分析方法对运动开始、中间和结束时的 RPE 进行比较。第一个分析以周期早期(周期的第一次)为对照,与随后阶段进行比较;第二个分析以第 1 至 5 天(卵泡早期)为对照,与随后阶段进行比较:共有 17 项研究(n = 160)被纳入定性综述。荟萃分析表明,MC 阶段对 RPE 没有影响(P > .05):目前的荟萃分析表明,MC 不会影响 RPE。虽然急性 RPE 不受 MC 阶段的影响,但未来的研究和从业人员应关注整个 MC 过程中各阶段对 RPE 的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信