Prevalence of Central Venous Stenosis among Black and White ESKD Patients with Dysfunctional Dialysis Access.

Nkiruka Arinze, Jonathan D Ravid, Kristina Yamkovoy, Najia Idrees, Mathew Diamond, Rohit Pillai, Tyler Ryan, Saran Lotfollahzadeh, Janice Weinberg, Nathanael R Fillmore, Alik Farber, Rajendran Vilvendhan, Jean Francis, Vipul Chitalia
{"title":"Prevalence of Central Venous Stenosis among Black and White ESKD Patients with Dysfunctional Dialysis Access.","authors":"Nkiruka Arinze, Jonathan D Ravid, Kristina Yamkovoy, Najia Idrees, Mathew Diamond, Rohit Pillai, Tyler Ryan, Saran Lotfollahzadeh, Janice Weinberg, Nathanael R Fillmore, Alik Farber, Rajendran Vilvendhan, Jean Francis, Vipul Chitalia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the United States, significant racial and ethnic disparities exist in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its management. Hemodialysis constitutes the main stay of renal replacement therapy for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), which is initiated using central venous catheters (CVC) in most CKD patients in the United States. Black ESKD patients have higher usage and greater time on CVC for hemodialysis compared to White patients. This trend places Black patients at a potentially higher risk for CVC-related complications such as central venous stenosis (CVS). We posited that Black patients would have a higher prevalence and a greater risk of CVS. A retrospective review was performed of ESKD patients who underwent a fistulogram for dialysis access malfunction. CVS was defined as > 50% stenosis in the central veins. Fistulograms of 428 ESKD patients were adjudicated, and CVS was noted in 167 of these patients. Of the entire cohort, 370 fistulograms belonged to self-reported unique Black and White ESKD patients, of whom 137 patients were noted to have CVS. There was no difference in the of CVS between Black (40%) and White (41%) ESKD patients. However, a higher severity of stenosis (>70%) (P = 0.03) was noted in White ESKD patients. An unadjusted model showed a significant association between CVS and cardiovascular disease and the use of CVCs. The risk-adjusted model showed a significant association between diabetes and CVS. Unlike arterial stenotic lesions, this work for the first time demonstrated higher prevalence of severe venous stenotic lesions in White ESKD patients and linked diabetes to stenotic venous disease. This work paves the way for future studies investigating the risk and influence of race and ethnicity on CVS using a larger and diverse data set.</p>","PeriodicalId":94083,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health disparities research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health disparities research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United States, significant racial and ethnic disparities exist in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its management. Hemodialysis constitutes the main stay of renal replacement therapy for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), which is initiated using central venous catheters (CVC) in most CKD patients in the United States. Black ESKD patients have higher usage and greater time on CVC for hemodialysis compared to White patients. This trend places Black patients at a potentially higher risk for CVC-related complications such as central venous stenosis (CVS). We posited that Black patients would have a higher prevalence and a greater risk of CVS. A retrospective review was performed of ESKD patients who underwent a fistulogram for dialysis access malfunction. CVS was defined as > 50% stenosis in the central veins. Fistulograms of 428 ESKD patients were adjudicated, and CVS was noted in 167 of these patients. Of the entire cohort, 370 fistulograms belonged to self-reported unique Black and White ESKD patients, of whom 137 patients were noted to have CVS. There was no difference in the of CVS between Black (40%) and White (41%) ESKD patients. However, a higher severity of stenosis (>70%) (P = 0.03) was noted in White ESKD patients. An unadjusted model showed a significant association between CVS and cardiovascular disease and the use of CVCs. The risk-adjusted model showed a significant association between diabetes and CVS. Unlike arterial stenotic lesions, this work for the first time demonstrated higher prevalence of severe venous stenotic lesions in White ESKD patients and linked diabetes to stenotic venous disease. This work paves the way for future studies investigating the risk and influence of race and ethnicity on CVS using a larger and diverse data set.

透析通路功能障碍的黑人和白人 ESKD 患者中央静脉狭窄的患病率。
在美国,慢性肾脏病(CKD)及其治疗存在着明显的种族和民族差异。血液透析是终末期肾病(ESKD)肾脏替代疗法的主要停留方式,美国大多数 CKD 患者都是通过中心静脉导管(CVC)开始血液透析的。与白人患者相比,黑人 ESKD 患者使用 CVC 进行血液透析的比例更高、时间更长。这一趋势使黑人患者可能面临更高的 CVC 相关并发症风险,如中心静脉狭窄 (CVS)。我们认为黑人患者的发病率更高,患 CVS 的风险也更大。我们对因透析通路故障而接受造瘘术的 ESKD 患者进行了回顾性检查。CVS 的定义是中心静脉狭窄程度大于 50%。对 428 例 ESKD 患者的瘘管造影进行了判定,其中 167 例患者出现了 CVS。在整个群体中,370 例瘘管造影属于自报的独特黑人和白人 ESKD 患者,其中 137 例患者被发现患有 CVS。黑人(40%)和白人(41%)ESKD 患者的 CVS 没有差异。然而,白人 ESKD 患者的血管狭窄严重程度更高(>70%)(P = 0.03)。未调整模型显示,CVS 和心血管疾病与使用 CVC 之间存在显著关联。风险调整模型显示,糖尿病与 CVS 之间存在显著关联。与动脉狭窄病变不同,这项研究首次证明了白种人 ESKD 患者中严重静脉狭窄病变的发病率较高,并将糖尿病与狭窄性静脉疾病联系起来。这项工作为今后使用更大、更多样化的数据集调查种族和民族对 CVS 的风险和影响的研究铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信