Poland's first vascular access team 3-year analysis: Insights and learnings.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1177/11297298241251502
Maciej Latos, Dariusz Kosson, Mateusz Zawadka
{"title":"Poland's first vascular access team 3-year analysis: Insights and learnings.","authors":"Maciej Latos, Dariusz Kosson, Mateusz Zawadka","doi":"10.1177/11297298241251502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, Poland saw a surge in interest in midline catheters (MCs) and Long Peripheral Catheters (LPCs) for intravenous therapy. Before this, MCs were not extensively utilised in the country, and there was no formally established Polish vascular access team. MCs, which have been used for years in many countries, are now becoming increasingly common in Poland. This study aimed to analyse the use of MCs in a 3-year perspective of their introduction in daily clinical practice based on a nurse-led Vascular Access Team (VAT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of adult patients who received intravenous therapy with 727 MCs and 293 LPCs from January 2021 to December 2023 at the University Clinical Centre of the Medical University of Warsaw were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main indication for cannulation was expected intravenous therapy over 5 days (81.66%, <i>n</i> = 833), of which 71.37% (<i>n</i> = 728) of patients in this group had concomitant difficult intravenous access (DIVA). Over 6 years, centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) inserted due to DIVA were reduced from <i>n</i> = 108 in 2017 to <i>n</i> = 18 in 2023. The end of intravenous therapy was the reason for the removal of 64.6% of catheters (<i>n</i> = 659), including death and switch to CICCs as well. Complications leading to premature removal accounted for 31.2%, such as: occlusion (14.6%), patient self-removal (7.1%) and thrombosis (3.43%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of MCs as a possible option for peripheral venous access reduces the use of CVCs. Developing MCs programmes should be based on investing in staff competencies, which increases success rates. The nurses and physicians should be trained in infusion care to achieve better results in the use of MCs and LPCs. Increasing the competence of nurses in Poland is necessary for the implementation of full-service and top-level functioning of VAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"887-895"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241251502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Poland saw a surge in interest in midline catheters (MCs) and Long Peripheral Catheters (LPCs) for intravenous therapy. Before this, MCs were not extensively utilised in the country, and there was no formally established Polish vascular access team. MCs, which have been used for years in many countries, are now becoming increasingly common in Poland. This study aimed to analyse the use of MCs in a 3-year perspective of their introduction in daily clinical practice based on a nurse-led Vascular Access Team (VAT).

Methods: The records of adult patients who received intravenous therapy with 727 MCs and 293 LPCs from January 2021 to December 2023 at the University Clinical Centre of the Medical University of Warsaw were analysed.

Results: The main indication for cannulation was expected intravenous therapy over 5 days (81.66%, n = 833), of which 71.37% (n = 728) of patients in this group had concomitant difficult intravenous access (DIVA). Over 6 years, centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs) inserted due to DIVA were reduced from n = 108 in 2017 to n = 18 in 2023. The end of intravenous therapy was the reason for the removal of 64.6% of catheters (n = 659), including death and switch to CICCs as well. Complications leading to premature removal accounted for 31.2%, such as: occlusion (14.6%), patient self-removal (7.1%) and thrombosis (3.43%).

Conclusions: The introduction of MCs as a possible option for peripheral venous access reduces the use of CVCs. Developing MCs programmes should be based on investing in staff competencies, which increases success rates. The nurses and physicians should be trained in infusion care to achieve better results in the use of MCs and LPCs. Increasing the competence of nurses in Poland is necessary for the implementation of full-service and top-level functioning of VAT.

波兰首个血管通路团队 3 年分析:洞察与学习。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,波兰对用于静脉治疗的中线导管 (MC) 和长外周导管 (LPC) 的兴趣激增。在此之前,波兰并未广泛使用中线导管,也没有正式成立波兰血管通路小组。MC 在许多国家已使用多年,现在在波兰也越来越普遍。这项研究的目的是分析由护士领导的血管通路团队(VAT)在日常临床实践中引入 MC 后 3 年的使用情况:方法:对华沙医科大学大学临床中心 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间接受 727 例 MC 和 293 例 LPC 静脉治疗的成年患者的记录进行分析:结果:插管的主要适应症是预计接受 5 天以上的静脉治疗(81.66%,n = 833),其中 71.37% 的患者(n = 728)伴有静脉通路困难 (DIVA)。6年间,因DIVA而插入的中心置管(CICC)从2017年的n = 108减少到2023年的n = 18。64.6%的导管(n = 659)拔除的原因是静脉治疗的结束,其中也包括死亡和改用 CICC。导致过早移除导管的并发症占 31.2%,如:闭塞(14.6%)、患者自行移除(7.1%)和血栓形成(3.43%):结论:将 MCs 作为外周静脉通路的一种可能选择,可减少 CVCs 的使用。MCs 计划的制定应以提高员工能力为基础,从而提高成功率。护士和医生应接受输液护理方面的培训,以便在使用 MCs 和 LPCs 方面取得更好的效果。在波兰,提高护士的能力是实施全方位服务和增值税最高级别运作的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信