Cultural Dynamics in the Levantine Upper Paleolithic, ca. 40-33 ky BP: Insights Based on Recent Advances in the Study of the Levantine Aurignacian, the Arkov-Divshon, and the Atlitian.

IF 1.8 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Journal of paleolithic archaeology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1007/s41982-024-00176-0
Maayan Shemer, Omry Barzilai, Ofer Marder
{"title":"Cultural Dynamics in the Levantine Upper Paleolithic, ca. 40-33 ky BP: Insights Based on Recent Advances in the Study of the Levantine Aurignacian, the Arkov-Divshon, and the Atlitian.","authors":"Maayan Shemer, Omry Barzilai, Ofer Marder","doi":"10.1007/s41982-024-00176-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The chrono-cultural sequence of the Levantine Upper Paleolithic went through several major revisions during approximately a century of focused research, each revision contributing to shedding light on the mosaic of cultural entities and the complex social and cultural dynamics composing the Levantine Upper Paleolithic. The current state of research suggests the co-inhabitance of two cultural groups: the Early Ahmarian and the Levantine Aurignacian. Two other cultural entities, the Arkov-Divshon and the Atlitian, are regarded as younger manifestations and were tentatively suggested to relate to the Levantine Aurignacian. This paper presents a research synthesis of two case studies: Manot Cave, located in western Galilee, Israel, and Nahal Rahaf 2 Rockshelter in the Judean Desert. The application of high-resolution excavation methods, alongside detailed documentation of the stratigraphy and site-formation processes and wide-scale radiocarbon-based absolute dating, marked these sites as ideal for chrono-cultural study through the analyses of flint industries. The results indicate a clear distinction between the Levantine Aurignacian and the Arkov-Divshon/Atlitian industries and a chronological overlap between the Arkov-Divshon, Levantine Aurignacian, and possibly with the Early Ahmarian. Subsequently, we suggest another revision of the currently accepted chrono-cultural model: not two, but at least three cultural entities co-inhabited the Levant at ca. 40-30 ky cal BP. This study further suggests an evolvement of the Atlitian flint industries from the Arkov-Divshon and stresses the foreign cultural features of the Levantine Aurignacian. These results were used to construct an updated model of migration and possible interaction patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":73885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paleolithic archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11058049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paleolithic archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-024-00176-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chrono-cultural sequence of the Levantine Upper Paleolithic went through several major revisions during approximately a century of focused research, each revision contributing to shedding light on the mosaic of cultural entities and the complex social and cultural dynamics composing the Levantine Upper Paleolithic. The current state of research suggests the co-inhabitance of two cultural groups: the Early Ahmarian and the Levantine Aurignacian. Two other cultural entities, the Arkov-Divshon and the Atlitian, are regarded as younger manifestations and were tentatively suggested to relate to the Levantine Aurignacian. This paper presents a research synthesis of two case studies: Manot Cave, located in western Galilee, Israel, and Nahal Rahaf 2 Rockshelter in the Judean Desert. The application of high-resolution excavation methods, alongside detailed documentation of the stratigraphy and site-formation processes and wide-scale radiocarbon-based absolute dating, marked these sites as ideal for chrono-cultural study through the analyses of flint industries. The results indicate a clear distinction between the Levantine Aurignacian and the Arkov-Divshon/Atlitian industries and a chronological overlap between the Arkov-Divshon, Levantine Aurignacian, and possibly with the Early Ahmarian. Subsequently, we suggest another revision of the currently accepted chrono-cultural model: not two, but at least three cultural entities co-inhabited the Levant at ca. 40-30 ky cal BP. This study further suggests an evolvement of the Atlitian flint industries from the Arkov-Divshon and stresses the foreign cultural features of the Levantine Aurignacian. These results were used to construct an updated model of migration and possible interaction patterns.

约公元前 40-33 千年的黎凡特上旧石器时代的文化动态:基于对黎凡特奥里格纳西人、阿科夫-迪夫申人和阿特利西亚人研究的最新进展的启示。
在大约一个世纪的集中研究中,阆中旧石器时代上层的年代文化序列经历了几次重大修订,每一次修订都有助于揭示构成阆中旧石器时代上层的文化实体组合和复杂的社会文化动态。目前的研究表明,有两个文化群体共同居住在这里:早期阿赫马里亚人和阆中奥里尼亚奇人。另外两个文化实体 Arkov-Divshon 和 Atlitian 被认为是更年轻的表现形式,并被初步认为与 Levantine Aurignacian 有关。本文是对两个案例研究的综述:马诺特洞穴(位于以色列加利利西部)和纳哈勒拉哈夫 2 号岩石庇护所(位于犹大沙漠)。高分辨率发掘方法的应用,加上对地层和遗址形成过程的详细记录,以及基于放射性碳的大范围绝对年代测定,使这些遗址成为通过分析燧石工业进行年代文化研究的理想场所。研究结果表明,黎凡特奥里尼亚克人和阿科夫-迪夫申人/阿利蒂亚人的工业有明显的区别,阿科夫-迪夫申人、黎凡特奥里尼亚克人以及可能与早期阿马利亚人在年代上有重叠。随后,我们建议对目前公认的年代-文化模型进行另一次修订:在约公元前 40-30 千年,不是两个,而是至少三个文化实体共同居住在黎凡特。公元前 40-30 千年。这项研究进一步表明,阿特利西亚的燧石工业是从阿科夫-迪夫申演变而来的,并强调了黎凡特奥里尼亚西亚的外来文化特征。这些结果被用来构建一个最新的移民模型和可能的互动模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信