Safety vs price in the generic drug market: metformin.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ben Teasdale, Amber Hudspeth, Kaury Kucera, David Light, Jill Nailor, Shannon Williams, Arnold Milstein, Kevin A Schulman
{"title":"Safety vs price in the generic drug market: metformin.","authors":"Ben Teasdale, Amber Hudspeth, Kaury Kucera, David Light, Jill Nailor, Shannon Williams, Arnold Milstein, Kevin A Schulman","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Generic medications represent 90% of prescriptions in the US market and provide a tremendous financial benefit for patients. Recently, multiple generic drugs have been recalled due to the presence of carcinogens, predominantly N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), including an extensive recall of extended-release (ER) metformin products in 2020.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Primary pharmaceutical quality testing and database analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We tested marketed metformin immediate-release (IR) and ER tablets from a wide sample of generic manufacturers for the presence of carcinogenic impurities NDMA and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). We examined the association of level of impurity with drug price and the impact of the 2020 FDA recalls on unit price and prescription fill rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postrecall NDMA levels were significantly lower in metformin ER samples (standardized mean difference = -2.0; P = .01); however, we found continued presence of carcinogens above the FDA threshold in 2 of 30 IR samples (6.67%). Overall, the presence of contaminant levels was not significantly associated with price for either IR (NDMA: R2 = 0.142; P = .981; DMF: R2 = 0.382; P = .436) or ER (NDMA: R2 = 0.124; P = .142; DMF: R2 = 0.199; P = .073) samples. Despite recalls, metformin ER prescription fills increased by 8.9% while unit price decreased by 19.61% (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recalls of metformin ER medications were effective in lowering NDMA levels below the FDA threshold; however, some samples of generic metformin still contained carcinogens even after FDA-announced recalls. The absence of any correlation with price indicates that potentially safer products are available on the market for the same price as poorer-quality products.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Generic medications represent 90% of prescriptions in the US market and provide a tremendous financial benefit for patients. Recently, multiple generic drugs have been recalled due to the presence of carcinogens, predominantly N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), including an extensive recall of extended-release (ER) metformin products in 2020.

Study design: Primary pharmaceutical quality testing and database analysis.

Methods: We tested marketed metformin immediate-release (IR) and ER tablets from a wide sample of generic manufacturers for the presence of carcinogenic impurities NDMA and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). We examined the association of level of impurity with drug price and the impact of the 2020 FDA recalls on unit price and prescription fill rate.

Results: Postrecall NDMA levels were significantly lower in metformin ER samples (standardized mean difference = -2.0; P = .01); however, we found continued presence of carcinogens above the FDA threshold in 2 of 30 IR samples (6.67%). Overall, the presence of contaminant levels was not significantly associated with price for either IR (NDMA: R2 = 0.142; P = .981; DMF: R2 = 0.382; P = .436) or ER (NDMA: R2 = 0.124; P = .142; DMF: R2 = 0.199; P = .073) samples. Despite recalls, metformin ER prescription fills increased by 8.9% while unit price decreased by 19.61% (P < .05).

Conclusions: Recalls of metformin ER medications were effective in lowering NDMA levels below the FDA threshold; however, some samples of generic metformin still contained carcinogens even after FDA-announced recalls. The absence of any correlation with price indicates that potentially safer products are available on the market for the same price as poorer-quality products.

仿制药市场的安全性与价格:二甲双胍。
目标:仿制药占美国市场处方药的 90%,为患者带来了巨大的经济效益。最近,多种仿制药因含有致癌物质(主要是 N-亚硝基二甲胺 (NDMA))而被召回,其中包括 2020 年对缓释二甲双胍产品的大规模召回:研究设计:初级药品质量检测和数据库分析:方法:我们对市场上销售的二甲双胍速释(IR)和缓释(ER)片剂进行了检测,这些片剂来自多个仿制药生产商的样本,检测其是否含有致癌杂质NDMA和N,N-二甲基甲酰胺(DMF)。我们研究了杂质含量与药品价格的关系,以及 2020 年 FDA 召回对单价和处方配药率的影响:二甲双胍 ER 样品召回后的 NDMA 含量明显降低(标准化平均差 = -2.0;P = .01);然而,我们发现 30 个 IR 样品中有 2 个(6.67%)的致癌物含量仍高于 FDA 的阈值。总体而言,无论是IR(NDMA:R2 = 0.142;P = .981;DMF:R2 = 0.382;P = .436)还是ER(NDMA:R2 = 0.124;P = .142;DMF:R2 = 0.199;P = .073)样品,其污染物含量与价格均无明显关联。尽管召回了二甲双胍 ER,但其处方数量仍增加了 8.9%,而单价却下降了 19.61%(P 结论:二甲双胍 ER 的召回数量增加了 8.9%,而单价却下降了 19.61%):二甲双胍 ER 药品召回能有效地将 NDMA 含量降至 FDA 临界值以下;然而,即使在 FDA 宣布召回后,一些仿制二甲双胍样品仍含有致癌物质。二甲双胍与价格之间没有任何相关性,这表明市场上可能存在与劣质产品相同价格的更安全产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信