Philippa G McFarlane, Catey Bunce, Katherine E Sleeman, Martina Orlovic, Jonathan Koffman, John Rosling, Alastair Bearne, Margaret Powell, Julia Riley, Joanne Droney
{"title":"Advance care planning before and during COVID-19: evaluation of 73,675 patients' records.","authors":"Philippa G McFarlane, Catey Bunce, Katherine E Sleeman, Martina Orlovic, Jonathan Koffman, John Rosling, Alastair Bearne, Margaret Powell, Julia Riley, Joanne Droney","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advance care planning (ACP) was encouraged by policymakers throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about use of ACP during this time.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare use of ACP before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Retrospective, observational cohort study, comparing the creation, use and content of Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination System records in London. Individuals aged 18+ with a Coordinate My Care Record, created and published in the pre-pandemic period (01/01/2018-31/12/2019), Wave1 (W1) (20/03/2020-04/07/2020), and Wave2 (W2) (01/10/2020-05/03/2021).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patient demographics and components of ACP were compared using descriptive and comparative statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>73,675 records were included; 35,108 pre-pandemic, 21,235 W1, 9,925 W2. Most records were created in primary care (56% pre-COVID, 76% in W1 and 48% in W2).Compared to the pre-pandemic period, the average weekly number of records created increased by 297% W1 (<i>P</i><0.005) and 29.1% W2 (<i>P</i><0.005). Patients with records created during the pandemic were younger (61% aged 80+ W1, 59% W2, 65% pre-pandemic (<i>P</i><0.005)). Patients with records created in W1 had longer estimated prognoses at record creation (73% had an estimated prognosis of 1 year+ W1 vs 53% pre-pandemic (<i>P</i><0.005)) and were more likely to be \"For Resuscitation\" (38% W1 vs 30% pre-pandemic (<i>P</i><0.005)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, increased ACP activity was observed, especially in primary care, and for younger people and those not imminently dying. Further research is needed to identify training and planning requirements as well as organisational and system changes to support sustained high-quality ACP within primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Advance care planning (ACP) was encouraged by policymakers throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about use of ACP during this time.
Aim: To compare use of ACP before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Design & setting: Retrospective, observational cohort study, comparing the creation, use and content of Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination System records in London. Individuals aged 18+ with a Coordinate My Care Record, created and published in the pre-pandemic period (01/01/2018-31/12/2019), Wave1 (W1) (20/03/2020-04/07/2020), and Wave2 (W2) (01/10/2020-05/03/2021).
Method: Patient demographics and components of ACP were compared using descriptive and comparative statistics.
Results: 73,675 records were included; 35,108 pre-pandemic, 21,235 W1, 9,925 W2. Most records were created in primary care (56% pre-COVID, 76% in W1 and 48% in W2).Compared to the pre-pandemic period, the average weekly number of records created increased by 297% W1 (P<0.005) and 29.1% W2 (P<0.005). Patients with records created during the pandemic were younger (61% aged 80+ W1, 59% W2, 65% pre-pandemic (P<0.005)). Patients with records created in W1 had longer estimated prognoses at record creation (73% had an estimated prognosis of 1 year+ W1 vs 53% pre-pandemic (P<0.005)) and were more likely to be "For Resuscitation" (38% W1 vs 30% pre-pandemic (P<0.005)).
Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, increased ACP activity was observed, especially in primary care, and for younger people and those not imminently dying. Further research is needed to identify training and planning requirements as well as organisational and system changes to support sustained high-quality ACP within primary care.