Resistance to Torsion of Cement vs Screw-Retained Abutments Under a Tangential Load: A Pilot Study.

Vanessa Navarrete, Ruben Angeles, Rolando Vernal, Erick Valdivia, Andrea Vergara-Buenaventura, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes Muniz, Emilio A Cafferata
{"title":"Resistance to Torsion of Cement vs Screw-Retained Abutments Under a Tangential Load: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Vanessa Navarrete, Ruben Angeles, Rolando Vernal, Erick Valdivia, Andrea Vergara-Buenaventura, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes Muniz, Emilio A Cafferata","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-23-00051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim is to compare the resistance to torsion between 2 implant systems with internal hexagon connection: one using screw-retained abutments (Titanium Fix) and the other using cementable abutments (ITEC) under a tangential load. An in vitro experimental study was carried out. Fourteen implants, 7 implants from each system, were included in this study. The implants were placed at a 45° angle into metal blocks to simulate their position in the maxilla. Then, implants were subjected to a resistance test on a CMT5L universal testing machine, and the maximum load was applied to each sample. The maximum force with which the torsion was achieved in each sample was analyzed. The data were tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test and showed normal distribution. Student t test was used to examine statistical significance between the two groups, and the P value was set at P < .05. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = .001). ITEC implants with a cementable abutment showed greater flexural strength compared to the Titanium Fix with a screwed abutment implant system. The cemented abutment showed more resistance to torsion against a tangential load compared with the screwed abutment.</p>","PeriodicalId":519890,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of oral implantology","volume":" ","pages":"421-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of oral implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-23-00051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim is to compare the resistance to torsion between 2 implant systems with internal hexagon connection: one using screw-retained abutments (Titanium Fix) and the other using cementable abutments (ITEC) under a tangential load. An in vitro experimental study was carried out. Fourteen implants, 7 implants from each system, were included in this study. The implants were placed at a 45° angle into metal blocks to simulate their position in the maxilla. Then, implants were subjected to a resistance test on a CMT5L universal testing machine, and the maximum load was applied to each sample. The maximum force with which the torsion was achieved in each sample was analyzed. The data were tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test and showed normal distribution. Student t test was used to examine statistical significance between the two groups, and the P value was set at P < .05. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = .001). ITEC implants with a cementable abutment showed greater flexural strength compared to the Titanium Fix with a screwed abutment implant system. The cemented abutment showed more resistance to torsion against a tangential load compared with the screwed abutment.

切向载荷下骨水泥与螺钉固位基台的抗扭转能力:试验研究。
目的:比较两种内六角连接的种植体系统在切向力作用下的抗扭转能力,一种是使用螺丝固位基台(钛基台),另一种是使用粘结基台(ITEC):进行了体外实验研究。这项研究包括 14 个种植体,每个系统各 7 个种植体。种植体以 45 度角植入金属块中,以模拟其在上颌骨中的位置。然后,在 CMT5L 万能试验机上对种植体进行阻力测试,并对每个样本施加最大载荷。对每个样本实现扭转的最大力进行了分析。数据采用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验,结果显示呈正态分布。采用学生 t 检验来检验两组之间的统计显著性,P 值设定为 P <0.05:结果:两组间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.001)。与带有螺丝基台的钛固定种植系统相比,带有可粘接基台的 ITEC 种植体显示出更高的抗弯强度:结论:与螺钉基台相比,粘结基台在承受切向负荷时具有更强的抗扭转能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信