Speckle-tracking global longitudinal strain predicts death and cardiovascular events in patients with systemic sclerosis.

European heart journal open Pub Date : 2024-04-03 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeae023
Giulia Stronati, Federico Guerra, Devis Benfaremo, Cristina Dichiara, Federico Paolini, Gianmarco Bastianoni, Leonardo Brugiatelli, Michele Alfieri, Paolo Compagnucci, Antonio Dello Russo, Gianluca Moroncini
{"title":"Speckle-tracking global longitudinal strain predicts death and cardiovascular events in patients with systemic sclerosis.","authors":"Giulia Stronati, Federico Guerra, Devis Benfaremo, Cristina Dichiara, Federico Paolini, Gianmarco Bastianoni, Leonardo Brugiatelli, Michele Alfieri, Paolo Compagnucci, Antonio Dello Russo, Gianluca Moroncini","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Albeit often asymptomatic, heart involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) represents a negative prognostic factor, accounting for nearly one-fourth of all deaths. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is accurate in detecting heart involvement in patients with SSc and no overt cardiac disease and allows early detection and longitudinal monitoring, but its association with clinical endpoints has not been tested so far. The primary outcome was the association between left and right GLS and mortality for all causes. The secondary outcome was the association between left and right GLS and hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A prospective longitudinal study enrolling all consecutive patients with SSc without structural heart disease or previous cardiovascular event.A total of 164 patients were enrolled, of whom 19 (11.5%) died during follow-up and 48 (29.3%) were hospitalized. Both left (LV) and right ventricle (RV) GLS at enrolment were independently associated with an increased risk of death for all causes and hospitalizations. Patients with biventricular GLS impairment, respectively, had a 4.2-, 4.9-, and 13.9-fold increased risk of death when compared with patients with only LV, only RV, or no impairment (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The incidence of hospitalization in patients with biventricular GLS impairment was nearly four times higher when compared with patients with only LV or only RV impairment, and nine times higher when compared with normal biventricular GLS (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biventricular GLS is associated with an increased risk of death and hospitalization in patients with SSc during a median of 3-year follow-up, acting as a reliable and accurate prognostic tool in everyday practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"4 2","pages":"oeae023"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Albeit often asymptomatic, heart involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) represents a negative prognostic factor, accounting for nearly one-fourth of all deaths. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is accurate in detecting heart involvement in patients with SSc and no overt cardiac disease and allows early detection and longitudinal monitoring, but its association with clinical endpoints has not been tested so far. The primary outcome was the association between left and right GLS and mortality for all causes. The secondary outcome was the association between left and right GLS and hospitalizations.

Methods and results: A prospective longitudinal study enrolling all consecutive patients with SSc without structural heart disease or previous cardiovascular event.A total of 164 patients were enrolled, of whom 19 (11.5%) died during follow-up and 48 (29.3%) were hospitalized. Both left (LV) and right ventricle (RV) GLS at enrolment were independently associated with an increased risk of death for all causes and hospitalizations. Patients with biventricular GLS impairment, respectively, had a 4.2-, 4.9-, and 13.9-fold increased risk of death when compared with patients with only LV, only RV, or no impairment (P < 0.001). The incidence of hospitalization in patients with biventricular GLS impairment was nearly four times higher when compared with patients with only LV or only RV impairment, and nine times higher when compared with normal biventricular GLS (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Biventricular GLS is associated with an increased risk of death and hospitalization in patients with SSc during a median of 3-year follow-up, acting as a reliable and accurate prognostic tool in everyday practice.

斑点追踪全局纵向应变可预测系统性硬化症患者的死亡和心血管事件。
目的:尽管系统性硬化症(SSc)患者通常无症状,但心脏受累是一个不利的预后因素,占所有死亡病例的近四分之一。整体纵向应变(GLS)能准确检测出没有明显心脏疾病的系统性硬化症患者的心脏受累情况,并能进行早期检测和纵向监测,但其与临床终点的相关性迄今尚未得到测试。主要结果是左侧和右侧GLS与各种原因死亡率之间的关系。次要结果是左右GLS与住院治疗之间的关系:这项前瞻性纵向研究招募了所有无结构性心脏病或既往无心血管事件的连续 SSc 患者,共招募了 164 名患者,其中 19 人(11.5%)在随访期间死亡,48 人(29.3%)住院治疗。入选时的左心室和右心室GLS均与各种原因死亡和住院风险的增加有关。与只有左心室、只有右心室或没有损伤的患者相比,双心室 GLS 损伤的患者死亡风险分别增加了 4.2 倍、4.9 倍和 13.9 倍(P < 0.001)。与仅有左心室或仅有左心室功能受损的患者相比,双心室GLS受损患者的住院发生率高出近四倍,与正常双心室GLS患者相比,住院发生率高出九倍(P < 0.001):在中位 3 年的随访中,双心室 GLS 与 SSc 患者死亡和住院风险的增加有关,在日常实践中是一种可靠而准确的预后工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信