Comparative evaluation of pre-emptive analgesic efficacy of Posterior Transversus Abdominis Plane block with Fascia Transversalis Plane Block in adult patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair: A prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-arm parallel study.

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-14 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_893_23
Vansh Priya, Rafat Shamim, Brijesh Singh, Shipra Singh, Prateek S Bais, Ganpat Prasad
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of pre-emptive analgesic efficacy of Posterior Transversus Abdominis Plane block with Fascia Transversalis Plane Block in adult patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia repair: A prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-arm parallel study.","authors":"Vansh Priya, Rafat Shamim, Brijesh Singh, Shipra Singh, Prateek S Bais, Ganpat Prasad","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_893_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Abdominal wall blocks, in conjunction with multimodal analgesia, have demonstrated efficacy in providing post-operative analgesia, reducing opioid requirements in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. The inguinal region is primarily innervated by the ilioinguinal nerve (IIN) and iliohypogastric nerve (IIH). Posterior transverse abdominis plane block (pTAP) and fascia transversalis plane block (TFP) have been observed to reliably block IIN and IIH. We hypothesized that posterior TAP block (pTAP) owing to its potential paravertebral spread will provide better post-operative analgesia than TFP block in patients undergoing unilateral open inguinal hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-arm parallel study was conducted over a duration of one year for which sixty patients undergoing unilateral open inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. They were equally and randomly assigned to receive either preoperative pTAP block or TFP block. The primary aim of the study was to compare median static and dynamic NRS scores during a 24-hour period, with the secondary aim to compare the number of patients who required rescue analgesics in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All enrolled patients completed the study. Results showed no statistically significant difference in median static NRS scores between Group pTAP and Group TFP at the designated time of observation during the 24-hour period [1.2 (0.4-1.60 vs. 1 (0.6-1)]. Group pTAP reported a higher median dynamic NRS scores during the 24-hour period [2.6 (1.2-3) v/s 2 (1.6-2.4); <i>P</i> < 0.035], although this difference was clinically insignificant. The mean time to request for the first rescue analgesia was comparable (11.7 h v/s 12 h; <i>P</i> = 0.99). In all the patients of both groups, loss of pinprick and cold touch sensation was observed at T10, T12, and L1 dermatomal levels. However, sensory assessment at T6 and T8 levels showed variability between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conjunction with background analgesia and the use of dexamethasone as an adjuvant, both blocks (pTAP and TFP) were observed to be equally effective for post-operative pain relief with similar patient satisfaction scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11033914/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_893_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Abdominal wall blocks, in conjunction with multimodal analgesia, have demonstrated efficacy in providing post-operative analgesia, reducing opioid requirements in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. The inguinal region is primarily innervated by the ilioinguinal nerve (IIN) and iliohypogastric nerve (IIH). Posterior transverse abdominis plane block (pTAP) and fascia transversalis plane block (TFP) have been observed to reliably block IIN and IIH. We hypothesized that posterior TAP block (pTAP) owing to its potential paravertebral spread will provide better post-operative analgesia than TFP block in patients undergoing unilateral open inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, single-blind, two-arm parallel study was conducted over a duration of one year for which sixty patients undergoing unilateral open inguinal hernia repair under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. They were equally and randomly assigned to receive either preoperative pTAP block or TFP block. The primary aim of the study was to compare median static and dynamic NRS scores during a 24-hour period, with the secondary aim to compare the number of patients who required rescue analgesics in each group.

Results: All enrolled patients completed the study. Results showed no statistically significant difference in median static NRS scores between Group pTAP and Group TFP at the designated time of observation during the 24-hour period [1.2 (0.4-1.60 vs. 1 (0.6-1)]. Group pTAP reported a higher median dynamic NRS scores during the 24-hour period [2.6 (1.2-3) v/s 2 (1.6-2.4); P < 0.035], although this difference was clinically insignificant. The mean time to request for the first rescue analgesia was comparable (11.7 h v/s 12 h; P = 0.99). In all the patients of both groups, loss of pinprick and cold touch sensation was observed at T10, T12, and L1 dermatomal levels. However, sensory assessment at T6 and T8 levels showed variability between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: In conjunction with background analgesia and the use of dexamethasone as an adjuvant, both blocks (pTAP and TFP) were observed to be equally effective for post-operative pain relief with similar patient satisfaction scores.

对接受单侧腹股沟疝修补术的成年患者进行腹横肌后侧平面阻滞与腹横肌筋膜平面阻滞的先期镇痛疗效比较评估:一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、双臂平行研究。
简介:腹壁阻滞与多模式镇痛相结合,在提供术后镇痛、减少腹股沟疝修补术患者对阿片类药物的需求方面效果显著。腹股沟区主要由髂腹股沟神经(IIN)和髂腹股沟神经(IIH)支配。据观察,后腹横肌平面阻滞(pTAP)和筋膜横肌平面阻滞(TFP)能可靠地阻滞 IIN 和 IIH。我们假设,在接受单侧开放性腹股沟疝修补术的患者中,后腹横肌平面阻滞(pTAP)由于其潜在的椎旁扩散,将比 TFP 阻滞提供更好的术后镇痛效果:这项前瞻性、随机、单盲、双臂平行研究为期一年,共招募了 60 名在脊髓麻醉下接受单侧开放性腹股沟疝修补术的患者。他们被随机平均分配接受术前 pTAP 阻滞或 TFP 阻滞。研究的主要目的是比较 24 小时内静态和动态 NRS 评分的中位数,次要目的是比较每组中需要抢救性镇痛药的患者人数:所有入组患者均完成了研究。结果显示,pTAP 组和 TFP 组在 24 小时内指定观察时间的静态 NRS 评分中位数差异无统计学意义[1.2(0.4-1.60 vs. 1(0.6-1)]。pTAP 组报告的 24 小时动态 NRS 评分中位数更高[2.6 (1.2-3) v/s 2 (1.6-2.4); P < 0.035],尽管这一差异在临床上并不显著。申请首次镇痛抢救的平均时间相当(11.7 小时对 12 小时;P = 0.99)。两组所有患者的 T10、T12 和 L1 皮层均出现针刺和冷触觉丧失。然而,两组患者在 T6 和 T8 水平的感觉评估存在差异(P > 0.05):结论:在使用背景镇痛和地塞米松辅助镇痛的情况下,两种阻滞(pTAP 和 TFP)对术后疼痛的缓解效果相同,患者满意度评分相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信