Med rec double check: Inpatient psychiatry medication errors identified on admission using Medicaid Web portals and electronic pharmaceutical claims data.

Su Su E Oo, Ian R McGrane
{"title":"Med rec double check: Inpatient psychiatry medication errors identified on admission using Medicaid Web portals and electronic pharmaceutical claims data.","authors":"Su Su E Oo, Ian R McGrane","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2024.04.097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of pharmacists during medication reconciliation (MR) is well established, with a number of reports describing this in the context of psychiatric hospitalizations. However, medication errors (MEs) are common during transitions of care, with no exception during psychiatric hospitalizations. Our institution uses pharmacy-performed MR processes using patient interviews and reviewing objective sources, such as electronic pharmaceutical claims data (EPCD), which includes Medicaid Web portals. The inpatient psychiatric pharmacist reviews EPCD sources against previously pharmacy-completed MRs for new admissions, where if discrepancies are found, the patient is reinterviewed to identify and correct MEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective quality improvement project during 28 days to evaluate the quantity and classification of MEs upon admission to a 22-bed inpatient psychiatry unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 52 included patients, where a cumulative 426 medications were reviewed, a total of 29 MEs in 16 patients were identified. Eight patients had discrepancies on their home medication lists when compared to EPCD, where 7 of these had at least 1 ME due to inaccurate MR.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Of all the MEs identified, the greatest quantity was found secondary to the EPCD \"double-check\" method. The most common MEs in all patients were the omission of home medications (34%), wrong frequency (28%), and ordering medication the patient is not taking (10%). All patients admitted on long-acting injection antipsychotics had errors in last dose received. No MEs resulted in patient harm, and they were identified and corrected by the psychiatric pharmacist 97% of the time.</p>","PeriodicalId":101313,"journal":{"name":"The mental health clinician","volume":"14 2","pages":"97-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11058325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The mental health clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2024.04.097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The role of pharmacists during medication reconciliation (MR) is well established, with a number of reports describing this in the context of psychiatric hospitalizations. However, medication errors (MEs) are common during transitions of care, with no exception during psychiatric hospitalizations. Our institution uses pharmacy-performed MR processes using patient interviews and reviewing objective sources, such as electronic pharmaceutical claims data (EPCD), which includes Medicaid Web portals. The inpatient psychiatric pharmacist reviews EPCD sources against previously pharmacy-completed MRs for new admissions, where if discrepancies are found, the patient is reinterviewed to identify and correct MEs.

Methods: We performed a prospective quality improvement project during 28 days to evaluate the quantity and classification of MEs upon admission to a 22-bed inpatient psychiatry unit.

Results: Of 52 included patients, where a cumulative 426 medications were reviewed, a total of 29 MEs in 16 patients were identified. Eight patients had discrepancies on their home medication lists when compared to EPCD, where 7 of these had at least 1 ME due to inaccurate MR.

Discussion: Of all the MEs identified, the greatest quantity was found secondary to the EPCD "double-check" method. The most common MEs in all patients were the omission of home medications (34%), wrong frequency (28%), and ordering medication the patient is not taking (10%). All patients admitted on long-acting injection antipsychotics had errors in last dose received. No MEs resulted in patient harm, and they were identified and corrected by the psychiatric pharmacist 97% of the time.

医疗记录双重检查:利用医疗补助网络门户和电子药品报销数据识别住院精神病患者入院时的用药错误。
导言:药剂师在用药调和(MR)过程中的作用已得到广泛认可,许多报告都介绍了药剂师在精神科住院治疗中的作用。然而,用药错误(ME)在护理过渡期间很常见,精神病住院期间也不例外。我们机构使用药房执行的 MR 流程,通过患者访谈和审查客观来源,如电子药品索赔数据 (EPCD),其中包括医疗补助门户网站。对于新入院的患者,住院精神科药剂师会根据之前药剂师填写的 MR 复核 EPCD 数据源,如果发现差异,则会对患者进行重新访谈,以识别并纠正 ME:我们开展了一项为期 28 天的前瞻性质量改进项目,以评估一个拥有 22 张床位的精神科住院病房入院时 ME 的数量和分类:结果:在纳入的 52 名患者中,共审查了 426 种药物,发现 16 名患者共有 29 种 ME。八名患者的家庭用药清单与 EPCD 存在差异,其中七名患者因 MR 不准确而至少有一项 ME:讨论:在所有已发现的ME中,EPCD "双重检查 "方法导致的ME数量最多。在所有患者中,最常见的 ME 是遗漏家庭用药(34%)、用药频率错误(28%)和订购患者未服用的药物(10%)。所有接受长效注射抗精神病药物治疗的患者在最后一次服药时都出现了错误。没有 ME 导致患者受到伤害,精神科药剂师在 97% 的情况下发现并纠正了这些错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信