A Comparative Study on Efficacy of Intraocular Pressure Lowering of Two Fixed-Dose Antiglaucoma Drug Combination Brinzolamide-Brimonidine Versus Latanoprost-Timolol in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Avinash Mishra, Mohini Agrawal, Anchal Tripathi, Atul Bhirud, Lt Col Rajnish Kumar, Brig Baranwal Vinod K
{"title":"A Comparative Study on Efficacy of Intraocular Pressure Lowering of Two Fixed-Dose Antiglaucoma Drug Combination Brinzolamide-Brimonidine Versus Latanoprost-Timolol in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.","authors":"Avinash Mishra, Mohini Agrawal, Anchal Tripathi, Atul Bhirud, Lt Col Rajnish Kumar, Brig Baranwal Vinod K","doi":"10.1089/jop.2023.0186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> To compare the efficacy of Brinzolamide-Brimonidine (BB) (1%+0.2%) with the gold standard Latanoprost-Timolol (LT) (0.005%+0.5%) in treating primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A 1-year prospective study, spanning from May 2022 to May 2023, conducted at a tertiary eye-care hospital. Participants, aged 40-60, with a baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mm Hg, requiring a >30% reduction, were enrolled. Group A (<i>n</i> = 100) received BB, and Group B (<i>n</i> = 100) received LT. Outcomes were assessed at 1 month (IOP difference from baseline), 3 and 6 months (mean diurnal variations). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The mean age at presentation was 55.5 ± 4.5 years in Group A and 54.7 ± 4.2 years in Group B. At 1 month, Group A exhibited a mean IOP of 18.7 mm Hg, while Group B had 17.6 mm Hg, with no statistically significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.53). No significant diurnal variation was observed in either group (<i>P</i> = 0.07). Target pressure was achieved in 88% of patients in Group A and slightly higher at 92% in Group B. Moreover, no serious side effects were reported, and compliance was higher in Group B (98%) compared to Group A (96%). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Although LT showed slightly better and sustained IOP reduction, the difference was not statistically significant. Both BB and LT demonstrated comparable outcomes for managing POAG and OHT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"240-245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2023.0186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of Brinzolamide-Brimonidine (BB) (1%+0.2%) with the gold standard Latanoprost-Timolol (LT) (0.005%+0.5%) in treating primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). Methods: A 1-year prospective study, spanning from May 2022 to May 2023, conducted at a tertiary eye-care hospital. Participants, aged 40-60, with a baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mm Hg, requiring a >30% reduction, were enrolled. Group A (n = 100) received BB, and Group B (n = 100) received LT. Outcomes were assessed at 1 month (IOP difference from baseline), 3 and 6 months (mean diurnal variations). Results: The mean age at presentation was 55.5 ± 4.5 years in Group A and 54.7 ± 4.2 years in Group B. At 1 month, Group A exhibited a mean IOP of 18.7 mm Hg, while Group B had 17.6 mm Hg, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.53). No significant diurnal variation was observed in either group (P = 0.07). Target pressure was achieved in 88% of patients in Group A and slightly higher at 92% in Group B. Moreover, no serious side effects were reported, and compliance was higher in Group B (98%) compared to Group A (96%). Conclusion: Although LT showed slightly better and sustained IOP reduction, the difference was not statistically significant. Both BB and LT demonstrated comparable outcomes for managing POAG and OHT.

两种固定剂量抗青光眼药物组合布林佐胺-溴莫尼定与拉坦前列素-噻吗洛尔在原发性开角型青光眼和眼压过高症中降低眼压疗效的比较研究
目的:比较布林佐胺-溴莫尼定(BB)(1%+0.2%)与金标准拉坦前列素-噻吗洛尔(LT)(0.005%+0.5%)治疗原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)和眼压过高(OHT)的疗效。研究方法一项为期 1 年的前瞻性研究,时间跨度为 2022 年 5 月至 2023 年 5 月,在一家三级眼科医院进行。参与者年龄在 40-60 岁之间,基线眼压(IOP)大于 21 mm Hg,需要降低大于 30% 的眼压。A组(100人)接受BB治疗,B组(100人)接受LT治疗。结果在 1 个月(眼压与基线的差异)、3 个月和 6 个月(平均昼夜变化)时进行评估。结果:1 个月时,A 组的平均眼压为 18.7 mm Hg,B 组为 17.6 mm Hg,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.53)。两组均未观察到明显的昼夜变化(P = 0.07)。此外,没有严重副作用的报告,B 组的依从性(98%)高于 A 组(96%)。结论虽然LT治疗的眼压降低效果稍好且持续时间较长,但差异无统计学意义。BB和LT治疗POAG和OHT的效果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal that combines the fields of ophthalmology and pharmacology to enable optimal treatment and prevention of ocular diseases and disorders. The Journal delivers the latest discoveries in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of therapeutics for the treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics coverage includes: Glaucoma Cataracts Retinal degeneration Ocular infection, trauma, and toxicology Ocular drug delivery and biotransformation Ocular pharmacotherapy/clinical trials Ocular inflammatory and immune disorders Gene and cell-based therapies Ocular metabolic disorders Ocular ischemia and blood flow Proliferative disorders of the eye Eyes on Drug Discovery - written by Gary D. Novack, PhD, featuring the latest updates on drug and device pipeline developments as well as policy/regulatory changes by the FDA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信