Disease modification in axial spondyloarthritis - still a controversy?

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Current opinion in rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1097/BOR.0000000000001025
Manouk de Hooge, Désirée van der Heijde
{"title":"Disease modification in axial spondyloarthritis - still a controversy?","authors":"Manouk de Hooge, Désirée van der Heijde","doi":"10.1097/BOR.0000000000001025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review evaluates recent advancements in disease-modifying therapies for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A recent study could not demonstrate an additional effect of NSAID therapy on golimumab [Tumor Necrosis Factor-α inhibitor (TNFi)] on structural progression; however, this might be due to the fact that the study was underpowered. While DMARDs have shown promise in suppressing inflammation, their impact on structural progression remains uncertain. A well powered trial showed no difference in spinal progression between secukinumab [Interleukin17A inhibitor (IL17Ai)] and adalimumab-biosimilar (TNFi). Preliminary data on Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) focus on MRI findings but lack evidence on radiographic spinal progression. While some studies suggest promising outcomes, others reveal limitations and inconclusive findings.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Recent studies explore the effectiveness of NSAIDs, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs like TNFi and IL-17i, as well as JAK inhibitors in axSpA. Conflicting evidence surrounds these therapies' ability to impede structural progression, with challenges in study design and interpretation. Moreover, changes in demographics and treatment methods underscore the importance of examining trends over time when assessing disease outcomes. Ultimately, ongoing research could benefit from new imaging tools when evaluating therapeutic strategies for modifying disease progression in axSpA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11145,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000001025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review evaluates recent advancements in disease-modifying therapies for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

Recent findings: A recent study could not demonstrate an additional effect of NSAID therapy on golimumab [Tumor Necrosis Factor-α inhibitor (TNFi)] on structural progression; however, this might be due to the fact that the study was underpowered. While DMARDs have shown promise in suppressing inflammation, their impact on structural progression remains uncertain. A well powered trial showed no difference in spinal progression between secukinumab [Interleukin17A inhibitor (IL17Ai)] and adalimumab-biosimilar (TNFi). Preliminary data on Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) focus on MRI findings but lack evidence on radiographic spinal progression. While some studies suggest promising outcomes, others reveal limitations and inconclusive findings.

Summary: Recent studies explore the effectiveness of NSAIDs, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs like TNFi and IL-17i, as well as JAK inhibitors in axSpA. Conflicting evidence surrounds these therapies' ability to impede structural progression, with challenges in study design and interpretation. Moreover, changes in demographics and treatment methods underscore the importance of examining trends over time when assessing disease outcomes. Ultimately, ongoing research could benefit from new imaging tools when evaluating therapeutic strategies for modifying disease progression in axSpA.

轴性脊柱关节炎的疾病改变--仍有争议吗?
综述的目的:本综述评估了轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)疾病修饰疗法的最新进展:最近的一项研究未能证明非甾体抗炎药物治疗对戈利木单抗(肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂(TNFi))结构进展的额外影响;不过,这可能是由于该研究的力量不足。虽然DMARDs在抑制炎症方面已显示出前景,但其对结构性进展的影响仍不确定。一项动力充足的试验显示,secukinumab(白细胞介素17A抑制剂(IL17Ai))与阿达木单抗生物类似物(TNFi)在脊柱进展方面没有差异。有关Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)的初步数据侧重于核磁共振成像结果,但缺乏脊柱放射学进展方面的证据。虽然一些研究表明结果很有希望,但另一些研究则显示出局限性和不确定的结果:最近的研究探讨了非甾体抗炎药、TNFi 和 IL-17i 等生物改变病情抗风湿药以及 JAK 抑制剂对 axSpA 的疗效。关于这些疗法是否能阻止结构性进展的证据相互矛盾,在研究设计和解释方面也存在挑战。此外,人口统计学和治疗方法的变化也凸显了在评估疾病预后时研究随时间变化趋势的重要性。最终,在评估改变axSpA疾病进展的治疗策略时,新的成像工具将使正在进行的研究受益匪浅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current opinion in rheumatology
Current opinion in rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Rheumatology offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of rheumatology. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include vasculitis syndromes, medical physiology and rheumatic diseases, crystal deposition diseases and rheumatoid arthritis. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信