Outcomes of non-operative management of penetrating abdominal trauma.

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
South African Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-03-01
N Almgla, M Raul Risk, S Edu, A Nicol, P Navsaria
{"title":"Outcomes of non-operative management of penetrating abdominal trauma.","authors":"N Almgla, M Raul Risk, S Edu, A Nicol, P Navsaria","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selective non-operative management (SNOM) of penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) is routinely practised in our trauma centre. This study aims to report the outcomes of patients who have failed SNOM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients presenting with PAT from 1 May 2015 - 31 January 2018 were reviewed. They were categorised into immediate laparotomy and delayed operative management (DOM) groups. Outcomes compared were postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 944 patients with PAT were reviewed. After excluding 100 patients undergoing damage control surgery, 402 (47.6%) and 542 (52.4%) were managed non-operatively and operatively, respectively. In the SNOM cohort, 359 (89.3%) were managed successfully without laparotomy. Thirty-seven (86.0%) patients in the DOM group had a therapeutic laparotomy, and six (14.0%) had an unnecessary laparotomy. Nine (20.9%) patients in the DOM group developed complications. The DOM group had lesser complications. However, the two groups had no difference in hospital length of stay (LOS). There was no mortality in the non-operative management (NOM) group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, we demonstrated no mortality and less morbidity in the DOM group when appropriately selected compared to the immediate laparotomy group. This supports the selective NOM approach for PAT in high volume trauma centres.</p>","PeriodicalId":51161,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Surgery","volume":"62 1","pages":"29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Selective non-operative management (SNOM) of penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) is routinely practised in our trauma centre. This study aims to report the outcomes of patients who have failed SNOM.

Methods: Patients presenting with PAT from 1 May 2015 - 31 January 2018 were reviewed. They were categorised into immediate laparotomy and delayed operative management (DOM) groups. Outcomes compared were postoperative complications, length of hospital stay and mortality.

Results: A total of 944 patients with PAT were reviewed. After excluding 100 patients undergoing damage control surgery, 402 (47.6%) and 542 (52.4%) were managed non-operatively and operatively, respectively. In the SNOM cohort, 359 (89.3%) were managed successfully without laparotomy. Thirty-seven (86.0%) patients in the DOM group had a therapeutic laparotomy, and six (14.0%) had an unnecessary laparotomy. Nine (20.9%) patients in the DOM group developed complications. The DOM group had lesser complications. However, the two groups had no difference in hospital length of stay (LOS). There was no mortality in the non-operative management (NOM) group.

Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrated no mortality and less morbidity in the DOM group when appropriately selected compared to the immediate laparotomy group. This supports the selective NOM approach for PAT in high volume trauma centres.

腹部穿透性创伤的非手术治疗效果。
背景:在我们的创伤中心,穿透性腹部创伤(PAT)的选择性非手术治疗(SNOM)是常规做法。本研究旨在报告 SNOM 失败患者的治疗结果:回顾性分析了 2015 年 5 月 1 日至 2018 年 1 月 31 日期间的 PAT 患者。他们被分为立即开腹手术组和延迟手术管理(DOM)组。比较结果为术后并发症、住院时间和死亡率:共审查了 944 名 PAT 患者。排除100名接受损伤控制手术的患者后,分别有402名(47.6%)和542名(52.4%)患者接受了非手术治疗和手术治疗。在 SNOM 组群中,359 例(89.3%)患者无需开腹手术即可成功治愈。在 DOM 组中,37 名(86.0%)患者进行了治疗性开腹手术,6 名(14.0%)患者进行了不必要的开腹手术。DOM 组中有 9 名(20.9%)患者出现了并发症。DOM 组的并发症较少。不过,两组患者的住院时间(LOS)并无差异。结论:在这项研究中,我们发现与立即开腹手术组相比,如果选择得当,DOM 组没有死亡率,发病率也较低。这支持了在大容量创伤中心对 PAT 采用选择性 NOM 方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Surgery (SAJS) is a quarterly, general surgical journal. It carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other surgical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries and general correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信