Contextual factors and mechanisms in the implementation of Value Stream Mapping in breast cancer centres – A multiple case study

IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Kerstin Dittmer, Marina Beckmann, Holger Pfaff, Ute Karbach
{"title":"Contextual factors and mechanisms in the implementation of Value Stream Mapping in breast cancer centres – A multiple case study","authors":"Kerstin Dittmer,&nbsp;Marina Beckmann,&nbsp;Holger Pfaff,&nbsp;Ute Karbach","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Lean, especially Value Stream Mapping is increasingly used in hospitals to optimize processes. This method, which originated in the automotive industry, enables all staff involved in the process to make it more customer-friendly. Despite the widely reported success of Lean projects, they have failed in some cases. This study investigated the contextual factors and mechanisms that contribute to a successful implementation of Value Stream Mapping.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Value Stream Mapping was applied to the discharge process in four breast cancer centers. A mixed-method approach was used in two steps. First, to verify the successful implementation, defined as time optimization, time measurement was conducted at three points in time and analyzed using an ANOVA. Second, an analysis of contextual factors was combined with a qualitative content analysis of mechanisms based on normalization process theory, using routine data, meeting protocols, field notes, and interview transcripts as data source.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At one of the four breast cancer centers, lead- and waiting time were significantly reduced; at the others, these reductions did not occur. Failure/success cannot be explained by the size of the hospital, the number of cases or staffing levels. The variable project team composition is evident, especially leadership involvement.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>A comparative analysis was conducted to identify the factors that led to success. These factors were: participation of all leaders relevant to the process, in the case of the discharge process including medical and nursing leaders; dissemination of the changes from the project team to colleagues including its sense and possibility to discuss it; joint reflection of the implementation process in regular work team meetings.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results confirm the important role of leadership in implementation projects. Leadership support enabled the mechanisms found. The used combination of theoretical approaches from management research and implementation science determined the interpretation and should be applied more often in implementation science.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"186 ","pages":"Pages 52-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000540/pdfft?md5=32bc9dd6c92a49f67eaf7dece16d0613&pid=1-s2.0-S1865921724000540-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724000540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Lean, especially Value Stream Mapping is increasingly used in hospitals to optimize processes. This method, which originated in the automotive industry, enables all staff involved in the process to make it more customer-friendly. Despite the widely reported success of Lean projects, they have failed in some cases. This study investigated the contextual factors and mechanisms that contribute to a successful implementation of Value Stream Mapping.

Methods

Value Stream Mapping was applied to the discharge process in four breast cancer centers. A mixed-method approach was used in two steps. First, to verify the successful implementation, defined as time optimization, time measurement was conducted at three points in time and analyzed using an ANOVA. Second, an analysis of contextual factors was combined with a qualitative content analysis of mechanisms based on normalization process theory, using routine data, meeting protocols, field notes, and interview transcripts as data source.

Results

At one of the four breast cancer centers, lead- and waiting time were significantly reduced; at the others, these reductions did not occur. Failure/success cannot be explained by the size of the hospital, the number of cases or staffing levels. The variable project team composition is evident, especially leadership involvement.

Discussion

A comparative analysis was conducted to identify the factors that led to success. These factors were: participation of all leaders relevant to the process, in the case of the discharge process including medical and nursing leaders; dissemination of the changes from the project team to colleagues including its sense and possibility to discuss it; joint reflection of the implementation process in regular work team meetings.

Conclusions

These results confirm the important role of leadership in implementation projects. Leadership support enabled the mechanisms found. The used combination of theoretical approaches from management research and implementation science determined the interpretation and should be applied more often in implementation science.

乳腺癌中心实施价值流图的背景因素和机制--多案例研究。
导言:精益生产,尤其是价值流图法越来越多地被医院用于优化流程。这种方法起源于汽车行业,它能让参与流程的所有员工使流程更加方便客户。尽管精益项目取得了广泛的成功,但也有失败的案例。本研究调查了有助于成功实施价值流分析法的背景因素和机制:方法:将价值流图应用于四个乳腺癌中心的出院流程。采用混合方法分两步进行。首先,为验证成功实施(即时间优化),在三个时间点进行了时间测量,并使用方差分析进行分析。其次,以规范化过程理论为基础,以常规数据、会议规程、现场记录和访谈记录为数据来源,将背景因素分析与机制的定性内容分析相结合:结果:在四个乳腺癌中心中,有一个中心的引导时间和等待时间显著缩短;而在其他中心,这些时间并未缩短。医院规模、病例数量或人员配置水平无法解释失败或成功的原因。项目团队的组成,尤其是领导层的参与程度,明显存在差异:讨论:通过比较分析,找出了导致成功的因素。这些因素包括:与流程相关的所有领导的参与,在出院流程中包括医疗和护理领导;从项目团队向同事传播变革,包括变革的意义和讨论的可能性;在工作团队例会上共同反思实施流程:这些结果证实了领导在实施项目中的重要作用。领导的支持促成了所发现的机制。将管理研究和实施科学的理论方法结合起来的做法决定了对问题的解释,应更多地应用于实施科学中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信