Every minute matters: Improving outcomes for penetrating trauma through prehospital advanced resuscitative care.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Juan Duchesne, Bryant J McLafferty, Jacob M Broome, Sydney Caputo, Joseph P Ritondale, Danielle Tatum, Sharven Taghavi, Olan Jackson-Weaver, Sherman Tran, Patrick McGrew, Kevin N Harrell, Alison Smith, Emily Nichols, Thomas Dransfield, Megan Marino, Mark Piehl
{"title":"Every minute matters: Improving outcomes for penetrating trauma through prehospital advanced resuscitative care.","authors":"Juan Duchesne, Bryant J McLafferty, Jacob M Broome, Sydney Caputo, Joseph P Ritondale, Danielle Tatum, Sharven Taghavi, Olan Jackson-Weaver, Sherman Tran, Patrick McGrew, Kevin N Harrell, Alison Smith, Emily Nichols, Thomas Dransfield, Megan Marino, Mark Piehl","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehospital resuscitation with blood products is gaining popularity for patients with traumatic hemorrhage. The MEDEVAC trial demonstrated a survival benefit exclusively among patients who received blood or plasma within 15 minutes of air medical evacuation. In fast-paced urban EMS systems with a high incidence of penetrating trauma, mortality data based on the timing to first blood administration is scarce. We hypothesize a survival benefit in patients with severe hemorrhage when blood is administered within the first 15 minutes of EMS patient contact.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of prehospital blood (PHB) administration between 2021 and 2023 in an urban EMS system facing increasing rates of gun violence. Prehospital blood patients were compared with trauma registry controls from an era before prehospital blood utilization (2016-2019). Included were patients with penetrating injury and SBP ≤ 90 mm Hg at initial EMS evaluation that received at least one unit of blood product after injury. Excluded were isolated head trauma or prehospital cardiac arrest. Time to initiation of blood administration before and after PHB implementation and in-hospital mortality were the primary variables of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 143 patients (PHB = 61, controls = 82) were included for analysis. Median age was 34 years with no difference in demographics. Median scene and transport intervals were longer in the PHB cohort, with a 5-minute increase in total prehospital time. Time to administration of first unit of blood was significantly lower in the PHB vs. control group (8 min vs. 27 min; p < 0.01). In-hospital mortality was lower in the PHB vs. control group (7% vs. 29%; p < 0.01). When controlling for patient age, NISS, tachycardia on EMS evaluation, and total prehospital time interval, multivariate regression revealed an independent increase in mortality by 11% with each minute delay to blood administration following injury (OR 1.11, 95%CI 1.04-1.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with patients with penetrating trauma and hypotension who first received blood after hospital arrival, resuscitation with blood products was started 19 minutes earlier after initiation of a PHB program despite a 5-minute increase in prehospital time. A survival for early PHB use was demonstrated, with an 11% mortality increase for each minute delay to blood administration. Interventions such as PHB may improve patient outcomes by helping capture opportunities to improve trauma resuscitation closer to the point of injury.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prehospital resuscitation with blood products is gaining popularity for patients with traumatic hemorrhage. The MEDEVAC trial demonstrated a survival benefit exclusively among patients who received blood or plasma within 15 minutes of air medical evacuation. In fast-paced urban EMS systems with a high incidence of penetrating trauma, mortality data based on the timing to first blood administration is scarce. We hypothesize a survival benefit in patients with severe hemorrhage when blood is administered within the first 15 minutes of EMS patient contact.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of prehospital blood (PHB) administration between 2021 and 2023 in an urban EMS system facing increasing rates of gun violence. Prehospital blood patients were compared with trauma registry controls from an era before prehospital blood utilization (2016-2019). Included were patients with penetrating injury and SBP ≤ 90 mm Hg at initial EMS evaluation that received at least one unit of blood product after injury. Excluded were isolated head trauma or prehospital cardiac arrest. Time to initiation of blood administration before and after PHB implementation and in-hospital mortality were the primary variables of interest.

Results: A total of 143 patients (PHB = 61, controls = 82) were included for analysis. Median age was 34 years with no difference in demographics. Median scene and transport intervals were longer in the PHB cohort, with a 5-minute increase in total prehospital time. Time to administration of first unit of blood was significantly lower in the PHB vs. control group (8 min vs. 27 min; p < 0.01). In-hospital mortality was lower in the PHB vs. control group (7% vs. 29%; p < 0.01). When controlling for patient age, NISS, tachycardia on EMS evaluation, and total prehospital time interval, multivariate regression revealed an independent increase in mortality by 11% with each minute delay to blood administration following injury (OR 1.11, 95%CI 1.04-1.19).

Conclusion: Compared with patients with penetrating trauma and hypotension who first received blood after hospital arrival, resuscitation with blood products was started 19 minutes earlier after initiation of a PHB program despite a 5-minute increase in prehospital time. A survival for early PHB use was demonstrated, with an 11% mortality increase for each minute delay to blood administration. Interventions such as PHB may improve patient outcomes by helping capture opportunities to improve trauma resuscitation closer to the point of injury.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

每一分钟都很重要:通过院前高级复苏护理改善穿透性创伤的治疗效果。
简介院前使用血液制品对创伤性出血患者进行复苏越来越受欢迎。MEDEVAC 试验表明,只有在空中医疗后送后 15 分钟内接受血液或血浆的患者才能获得生存。在穿透性创伤发生率较高的快节奏城市急救系统中,基于首次给血时间的死亡率数据非常稀少。我们假设,如果在急救医疗系统接触患者后的 15 分钟内给患者输血,严重大出血患者的存活率将有所提高:这是一项对 2021 年至 2023 年期间院前献血(PHB)前瞻性数据库的回顾性分析,研究对象是一个枪支暴力事件发生率不断上升的城市急救系统。PHB患者与院前用血之前(2016-2019年)的创伤登记对照组进行了比较。纳入的患者均为穿透性损伤,且在初步急救评估时 SBP ≤ 90 mmHg,并在受伤后接受了至少一个单位的血液制品。不包括孤立的头部创伤或院前心脏骤停患者。实施PHB前后开始输血的时间和院内死亡率是主要的关注变量:共有 143 名患者(PHB = 61 例,对照 = 82 例)被纳入分析。中位年龄为 34 岁,人口统计学无差异。PHB组患者的现场和转运间隔中位数更长,院前总时间增加了5分钟。PHB 组与对照组相比,输注第一单位血液的时间明显缩短(8 分钟对 27 分钟;P < 0.01)。PHB 组与对照组相比,院内死亡率更低(7% 对 29%;P < 0.01)。在控制了患者年龄、NISS、急救评估时的心动过速和院前总时间间隔后,多变量回归显示,受伤后每延迟一分钟给血,死亡率就会增加11%(OR 1.11,95%CI 1.04-1.19):尽管院前急救时间增加了 5 分钟,但与到达医院后首次接受输血的穿透性创伤和低血压患者相比,启动 PHB 项目后,使用血液制品进行复苏的时间提前了 19 分钟。早期使用 PHB 的存活率得到了证实,输血时间每延迟一分钟,死亡率就会增加 11%。PHB等干预措施可帮助把握机会,在更接近受伤点时改善创伤复苏,从而改善患者预后:证据级别:前瞻性,IV 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信