How Can Community Data Be Leveraged to Advance Primary Health Care? A Scoping Review of Community-Based Health Information Systems.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shivani Pandya, Lena Kan, Emily Parr, Claire Twose, Alain B Labrique, Smisha Agarwal
{"title":"How Can Community Data Be Leveraged to Advance Primary Health Care? A Scoping Review of Community-Based Health Information Systems.","authors":"Shivani Pandya, Lena Kan, Emily Parr, Claire Twose, Alain B Labrique, Smisha Agarwal","doi":"10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community-based health information systems (CBISs) can provide critical insights into how community health systems function, and digitized CBISs may improve the quality of community-level data and facilitate integration and use of CBISs within the broader health system. This scoping review aims to understand how CBISs have been implemented, integrated, and used to support community health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both peer-reviewed and gray literature were included; relevant articles were identified using key terms and controlled vocabulary related to community/primary health care, health information systems, digital health, and LMICs. A total of 11,611 total records were identified from 5 databases and the gray literature. After deduplication, 6,985 peer-reviewed/gray literature were screened, and 95 articles/reports were included, reporting on 105 CBIS implementations across 38 countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings show that 55% of CBISs included some level of digitization, with just 28% being fully digitized (for data collection and reporting). Data flow from the community level into the health system varied, with digitized CBISs more likely to reach national-level integration. National-level integration was primarily seen among vertical CBISs. Data quality challenges were present in both paper-based and digitized CBISs, exacerbated by fragmentation of the community health landscape with often parallel reporting systems. CBIS data use was constrained to mostly vertical and digitized (partially or fully) CBISs at national/subnational levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digitization can play a pivotal role in strengthening CBIS use, but findings demonstrate that CBISs are only as effective as the community health systems they are embedded within. Community-level data are often not being integrated into national/subnational health information systems, undermining the ability to understand what the community health needs are. Furthermore, stronger investments within community health systems need to be in place broadly to reduce fragmentation and provide stronger infrastructural and systemic support to the community health workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":12692,"journal":{"name":"Global Health: Science and Practice","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health: Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community-based health information systems (CBISs) can provide critical insights into how community health systems function, and digitized CBISs may improve the quality of community-level data and facilitate integration and use of CBISs within the broader health system. This scoping review aims to understand how CBISs have been implemented, integrated, and used to support community health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods: Both peer-reviewed and gray literature were included; relevant articles were identified using key terms and controlled vocabulary related to community/primary health care, health information systems, digital health, and LMICs. A total of 11,611 total records were identified from 5 databases and the gray literature. After deduplication, 6,985 peer-reviewed/gray literature were screened, and 95 articles/reports were included, reporting on 105 CBIS implementations across 38 countries.

Results: Findings show that 55% of CBISs included some level of digitization, with just 28% being fully digitized (for data collection and reporting). Data flow from the community level into the health system varied, with digitized CBISs more likely to reach national-level integration. National-level integration was primarily seen among vertical CBISs. Data quality challenges were present in both paper-based and digitized CBISs, exacerbated by fragmentation of the community health landscape with often parallel reporting systems. CBIS data use was constrained to mostly vertical and digitized (partially or fully) CBISs at national/subnational levels.

Conclusion: Digitization can play a pivotal role in strengthening CBIS use, but findings demonstrate that CBISs are only as effective as the community health systems they are embedded within. Community-level data are often not being integrated into national/subnational health information systems, undermining the ability to understand what the community health needs are. Furthermore, stronger investments within community health systems need to be in place broadly to reduce fragmentation and provide stronger infrastructural and systemic support to the community health workforce.

如何利用社区数据推进初级卫生保健?基于社区的医疗信息系统范围审查》。
背景:以社区为基础的卫生信息系统(CBISs)可以为了解社区卫生系统如何运作提供重要信息,数字化的CBISs可以提高社区数据的质量,促进CBISs在更广泛的卫生系统中的整合和使用。本范围综述旨在了解中低收入国家(LMICs)如何实施、整合和使用社区卫生信息系统以支持社区卫生成果:方法:纳入同行评议文献和灰色文献;使用与社区/初级卫生保健、卫生信息系统、数字卫生和中低收入国家相关的关键术语和控制词汇确定相关文章。从 5 个数据库和灰色文献中共识别出 11,611 条记录。经过重复数据删除后,筛选出 6,985 篇同行评审/灰色文献,其中包括 95 篇文章/报告,报告了 38 个国家的 105 项 CBIS 实施情况:研究结果表明,55% 的社区信息服务系统在一定程度上实现了数字化,只有 28% 实现了完全数字化(用于数据收集和报告)。从社区层面到卫生系统的数据流各不相同,数字化社区信息服务系统更有可能实现国家一级的整合。国家层面的整合主要体现在纵向 CBIS 中。纸质和数字化的社区卫生信息系统都存在数据质量问题,而社区卫生环境的分散性和报告系统的并行性加剧了这一问题。社区卫生信息系统数据的使用主要局限于国家/国家以下层面的纵向和数字化(部分或全部)社区卫生信息系统:数字化可在加强社区卫生信息系统的使用方面发挥关键作用,但研究结果表明,社区卫生信息系统的有效性取决于其所嵌入的社区卫生系统。社区一级的数据往往没有被纳入国家/次国家卫生信息系统,从而削弱了了解社区卫生需求的能力。此外,需要对社区卫生系统进行更有力的投资,以减少各自为政的现象,并为社区卫生工作人员提供更有力的基础设施和系统支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health: Science and Practice
Global Health: Science and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
178
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health: Science and Practice (GHSP) is a no-fee, open-access, peer-reviewed, online journal aimed to improve health practice, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Our goal is to reach those who design, implement, manage, evaluate, and otherwise support health programs. We are especially interested in advancing knowledge on practical program implementation issues, with information on what programs entail and how they are implemented. GHSP is currently indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, POPLINE, EBSCO, SCOPUS,. the Web of Science Emerging Sources Citation Index, and the USAID Development Experience Clearinghouse (DEC). TOPICS: Issued four times a year, GHSP will include articles on all global health topics, covering diverse programming models and a wide range of cross-cutting issues that impact and support health systems. Examples include but are not limited to: Health: Addiction and harm reduction, Child Health, Communicable and Emerging Diseases, Disaster Preparedness and Response, Environmental Health, Family Planning/Reproductive Health, HIV/AIDS, Malaria, Maternal Health, Neglected Tropical Diseases, Non-Communicable Diseases/Injuries, Nutrition, Tuberculosis, Water and Sanitation. Cross-Cutting Issues: Epidemiology, Gender, Health Communication/Healthy Behavior, Health Policy and Advocacy, Health Systems, Human Resources/Training, Knowledge Management, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Management and Governance, mHealth/eHealth/digital health, Monitoring and Evaluation, Scale Up, Youth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信