Lower anxiety level to perform movements after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis compared to without lateral extra-articular tenodesis.

Q1 Medicine
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1007/s12306-024-00818-0
T Vendrig, M N J Keizer, R W Brouwer, H Houdijk, R A G Hoogeslag
{"title":"Lower anxiety level to perform movements after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis compared to without lateral extra-articular tenodesis.","authors":"T Vendrig, M N J Keizer, R W Brouwer, H Houdijk, R A G Hoogeslag","doi":"10.1007/s12306-024-00818-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the anxiety level to perform movements in patients after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) compared to patients after revision ACLR without LET.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety patients who underwent revision ACLR with ipsilateral bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and with a minimum of 12 months follow-up were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who received revision ACLR in combination with LET (revision ACLR_LET group; mean follow-up: 29.4 months, range: 12-80 months), and patients who received revision ACLR without LET (revision ACLR group; mean follow-up: 61.1 months, range: 22-192 months). All patients filled in a questionnaire about anxiety level related to physical activity and sports, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form (IKDC<sub>subjective</sub>), and the Tegner Activity Score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the revision ACLR_LET group had a significantly lower anxiety level to perform movements than patients in the revision ACLR group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in KOOS, IKDC<sub>subjective</sub>, and Tegner Activity Scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who received LET in addition to revision ACLR have a lower anxiety level to perform movements than patients with revision ACLR alone, despite non-different subjective functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study, Level of evidence: III.</p>","PeriodicalId":18875,"journal":{"name":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","volume":" ","pages":"225-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11133111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-024-00818-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the anxiety level to perform movements in patients after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) compared to patients after revision ACLR without LET.

Methods: Ninety patients who underwent revision ACLR with ipsilateral bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and with a minimum of 12 months follow-up were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who received revision ACLR in combination with LET (revision ACLR_LET group; mean follow-up: 29.4 months, range: 12-80 months), and patients who received revision ACLR without LET (revision ACLR group; mean follow-up: 61.1 months, range: 22-192 months). All patients filled in a questionnaire about anxiety level related to physical activity and sports, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form (IKDCsubjective), and the Tegner Activity Score.

Results: Patients in the revision ACLR_LET group had a significantly lower anxiety level to perform movements than patients in the revision ACLR group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in KOOS, IKDCsubjective, and Tegner Activity Scores.

Conclusions: Patients who received LET in addition to revision ACLR have a lower anxiety level to perform movements than patients with revision ACLR alone, despite non-different subjective functional outcomes.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study, Level of evidence: III.

与未进行外侧关节外腱鞘挛缩术的前十字韧带翻修重建术相比,进行外侧关节外腱鞘挛缩术后做动作的焦虑程度更低。
目的:评估前交叉韧带翻修重建术(ACLR)联合外侧关节外腱鞘挛缩术(LET)与不联合外侧关节外腱鞘挛缩术的患者相比,患者在做动作时的焦虑程度:本研究共纳入了 90 名接受同侧骨-髌腱-骨自体移植前交叉韧带翻修术且随访至少 12 个月的患者。患者被分为两组:结合 LET 接受前交叉韧带翻修术的患者(前交叉韧带翻修术_LET 组;平均随访时间:29.4 个月,随访范围:12-80 个月)和未接受 LET 的前交叉韧带翻修术的患者(前交叉韧带翻修术组;平均随访时间:61.1 个月,随访范围:22-192 个月)。所有患者都填写了一份与体力活动和运动相关的焦虑程度问卷、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)、国际膝关节文献委员会主观表格(IKDCsubjective)和泰格纳活动评分:结果:前交叉韧带复位(ACLR)_LET翻修组患者在做动作时的焦虑程度明显低于前交叉韧带复位(ACLR)翻修组患者(P主观评分和Tegner活动评分):研究设计:研究设计:回顾性队列研究,证据等级:III:研究设计:回顾性队列研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Surgery – Formerly La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, founded in 1917 at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. The journal provides up-to-date information to clinicians and scientists through the publication of original papers, reviews, case reports, and brief communications dealing with the pathogenesis and treatment of orthopaedic conditions.An electronic version is also available at http://www.springerlink.com.The journal is open for publication of supplements and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editors-in-Chief or the Publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信