Modification of velopharyngeal closure pressures during phonation by neuromuscular electrical stimulation in healthy individuals.

Q1 Medicine
GMS German Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-03-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3205/000329
Simone Miller, Katharina Peters, Martin Ptok, Michael Jungheim
{"title":"Modification of velopharyngeal closure pressures during phonation by neuromuscular electrical stimulation in healthy individuals.","authors":"Simone Miller, Katharina Peters, Martin Ptok, Michael Jungheim","doi":"10.3205/000329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rhinophonia aperta may result from velopharyngeal insufficiency. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been discussed in the context of muscle strengthening. The aim of this study was to evaluate in healthy subjects whether NMES can change the velopharyngeal closure pattern during phonation and increase muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eleven healthy adult volunteers (21-57 years) were included. Pressure profiles were measured by high resolution manometry (HRM): isolated sustained articulation of /a/ over 5 s (protocol 1), isolated NMES applied to soft palate above motor threshold (protocol 2) and combined articulation with NMES (protocol 3). Mean activation pressures (MeanAct), maximum pressures (Max), Area under curve (AUC) and type of velum reactions were compared. A statistical comparison of mean values of protocol 1 versus protocol 3 was carried out using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Ordinally scaled parameters were analyzed by cross table.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MeanAct values measured: 17.15±20.69 mmHg (protocol 1), 34.59±25.75 mmHg (protocol 3) on average, Max: 37.86±49.17 mmHg (protocol 1), 87.24±59.53 mmHg (protocol 3) and AUC: 17.06±20.70 mmHg.s (protocol 1), 33.76±23.81 mmHg.s (protocol 3). Protocol 2 produced velum reactions on 32 occasions. These presented with MeanAct values of 13.58±12.40 mmHg, Max values of 56.14±53.14 mmHg and AUC values of 13.84±12.78 mmHg.s on average. Statistical analysis comparing protocol 1 and 3 showed more positive ranks for MeanAct, Max and AUC. This difference reached statistical significance (p=0.026) for maximum pressure values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NMES in combination with articulation results in a change of the velopharyngeal closure pattern with a pressure increase of around 200% in healthy individuals. This might be of therapeutic benefit for patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":39243,"journal":{"name":"GMS German Medical Science","volume":"22 ","pages":"Doc03"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11034089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS German Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/000329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Rhinophonia aperta may result from velopharyngeal insufficiency. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been discussed in the context of muscle strengthening. The aim of this study was to evaluate in healthy subjects whether NMES can change the velopharyngeal closure pattern during phonation and increase muscle strength.

Method: Eleven healthy adult volunteers (21-57 years) were included. Pressure profiles were measured by high resolution manometry (HRM): isolated sustained articulation of /a/ over 5 s (protocol 1), isolated NMES applied to soft palate above motor threshold (protocol 2) and combined articulation with NMES (protocol 3). Mean activation pressures (MeanAct), maximum pressures (Max), Area under curve (AUC) and type of velum reactions were compared. A statistical comparison of mean values of protocol 1 versus protocol 3 was carried out using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Ordinally scaled parameters were analyzed by cross table.

Results: MeanAct values measured: 17.15±20.69 mmHg (protocol 1), 34.59±25.75 mmHg (protocol 3) on average, Max: 37.86±49.17 mmHg (protocol 1), 87.24±59.53 mmHg (protocol 3) and AUC: 17.06±20.70 mmHg.s (protocol 1), 33.76±23.81 mmHg.s (protocol 3). Protocol 2 produced velum reactions on 32 occasions. These presented with MeanAct values of 13.58±12.40 mmHg, Max values of 56.14±53.14 mmHg and AUC values of 13.84±12.78 mmHg.s on average. Statistical analysis comparing protocol 1 and 3 showed more positive ranks for MeanAct, Max and AUC. This difference reached statistical significance (p=0.026) for maximum pressure values.

Conclusions: NMES in combination with articulation results in a change of the velopharyngeal closure pattern with a pressure increase of around 200% in healthy individuals. This might be of therapeutic benefit for patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.

通过神经肌肉电刺激改变健康人发音时的咽后闭合压力。
简介会厌炎可能是咽喉发育不全造成的。神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)已在肌肉强化方面进行了讨论。本研究旨在评估神经肌肉电刺激能否改变健康受试者发音时的会厌闭合模式并增强肌肉力量:方法:研究对象包括 11 名健康的成年志愿者(21-57 岁)。通过高分辨率测压法(HRM)测量了压力曲线:5 秒内单独持续发音 /a/(方案 1)、单独对软腭施加高于运动阈值的 NMES(方案 2)以及结合 NMES 的发音(方案 3)。对平均激活压力(MeanAct)、最大压力(Max)、曲线下面积(AUC)和伶牙俐齿反应类型进行了比较。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验对方案 1 和方案 3 的平均值进行了统计比较。用交叉表分析了按顺序排列的参数:测得的平均 Act 值:17.15±20.69 mmHg(方案 1),34.59±25.75 mmHg(方案 3);最大值:37.86±49.17 mmHg(方案 1),87.24±59.53 mmHg(方案 3);AUC:17.06±20.70 mmHg(方案 1),87.24±59.53 mmHg(方案 3):17.06±20.70 mmHg.s(方案 1)、33.76±23.81 mmHg.s(方案 3)。方案 2 在 32 个场合产生了绒毛反应。其平均 Act 值为 13.58±12.40mmHg,最大值为 56.14±53.14mmHg,AUC 值为 13.84±12.78mmHg.s。比较方案 1 和方案 3 的统计分析显示,平均作用值、最大值和 AUC 值的正等级更多。在最大压力值方面,这一差异具有统计学意义(P=0.026):结论:NMES 与发音相结合可改变咽喉闭合模式,使健康人的压力增加约 200%。结论:NMES 与发音相结合可改变健康人的咽喉闭合模式,使压力增加约 200%,这可能对患有咽喉功能不全的患者有治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS German Medical Science
GMS German Medical Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信