A Master Protocol Template for Pediatric ARDS Studies.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Andrew G Miller, Martha Aq Curley, Claire Destrampe, Heidi Flori, Robinder Khemani, Amy Ohmer, Neal J Thomas, Nadir Yehya, Shan Ward, Leanne West, Kanecia O Zimmerman, Saranya Venkatachalam, Sonya Sutton, Christoph P Hornik
{"title":"A Master Protocol Template for Pediatric ARDS Studies.","authors":"Andrew G Miller, Martha Aq Curley, Claire Destrampe, Heidi Flori, Robinder Khemani, Amy Ohmer, Neal J Thomas, Nadir Yehya, Shan Ward, Leanne West, Kanecia O Zimmerman, Saranya Venkatachalam, Sonya Sutton, Christoph P Hornik","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric ARDS is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. High-quality data from clinical trials in children are limited due to numerous barriers to their design and execution. Here we describe the collaborative development of a master protocol as a tool to address some of these barriers and support the conduct of pediatric ARDS studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using PubMed, we performed a literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pediatric ARDS to characterize the current state and evaluate potential benefit of harmonized master protocols. We used a multi-stakeholder, collaborative, and team science-oriented process to develop a master protocol template with links to common data elements (CDEs) for pediatric ARDS trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 11 RCTs that enrolled between 14-200 total subjects per trial. Interventions included mechanical ventilation, prone positioning, corticosteroids, and surfactant. Studies displayed significant heterogeneity in ARDS definition, design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and reported outcomes. Mortality was reported in 91% of trials and ventilator-free days in 73%. The trial heterogeneity made pooled analysis unfeasible. These findings underscore the need for a method to facilitate combined analysis of future trials through standardization of trial elements. As a potential solution, we developed a master protocol, iteratively revised with input from a multidisciplinary panel of experts and organized into 3 categories: instructions and general information, templated language, and a series of text options of common pediatric ARDS trial scenarios. Finally, we linked master protocol sections to relevant CDEs previously defined for pediatric ARDS and captured in a series of electronic case report forms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of pediatric ARDS trials identified were small and heterogeneous in study design and outcome reporting. Using a master protocol template for pediatric ARDS trials with CDEs would support combining and comparing pediatric ARDS trial findings and increase the knowledge base.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1284-1293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11839","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric ARDS is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. High-quality data from clinical trials in children are limited due to numerous barriers to their design and execution. Here we describe the collaborative development of a master protocol as a tool to address some of these barriers and support the conduct of pediatric ARDS studies.

Methods: Using PubMed, we performed a literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pediatric ARDS to characterize the current state and evaluate potential benefit of harmonized master protocols. We used a multi-stakeholder, collaborative, and team science-oriented process to develop a master protocol template with links to common data elements (CDEs) for pediatric ARDS trials.

Results: We identified 11 RCTs that enrolled between 14-200 total subjects per trial. Interventions included mechanical ventilation, prone positioning, corticosteroids, and surfactant. Studies displayed significant heterogeneity in ARDS definition, design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and reported outcomes. Mortality was reported in 91% of trials and ventilator-free days in 73%. The trial heterogeneity made pooled analysis unfeasible. These findings underscore the need for a method to facilitate combined analysis of future trials through standardization of trial elements. As a potential solution, we developed a master protocol, iteratively revised with input from a multidisciplinary panel of experts and organized into 3 categories: instructions and general information, templated language, and a series of text options of common pediatric ARDS trial scenarios. Finally, we linked master protocol sections to relevant CDEs previously defined for pediatric ARDS and captured in a series of electronic case report forms.

Conclusions: The majority of pediatric ARDS trials identified were small and heterogeneous in study design and outcome reporting. Using a master protocol template for pediatric ARDS trials with CDEs would support combining and comparing pediatric ARDS trial findings and increase the knowledge base.

儿科 ARDS 研究的主协议模板。
背景:小儿 ARDS 与严重的发病率和死亡率有关。由于设计和执行过程中存在诸多障碍,来自儿童临床试验的高质量数据十分有限。在此,我们介绍了合作开发主协议的情况,该协议是解决其中一些障碍并支持开展儿科 ARDS 研究的工具:方法:我们使用 PubMed 对儿科 ARDS 随机对照试验 (RCT) 进行了文献检索,以了解现状并评估统一主方案的潜在益处。我们采用了多方合作、团队科学导向的方法,为儿科 ARDS 试验开发了一个与通用数据元素(CDEs)链接的主协议模板:我们确定了 11 项 RCT,每项试验共招募了 14-200 名受试者。干预措施包括机械通气、俯卧位、皮质类固醇和表面活性物质。在 ARDS 的定义、设计、纳入和排除标准以及报告结果方面,研究显示出明显的异质性。91%的试验报告了死亡率,73%的试验报告了无呼吸机天数。由于试验存在异质性,因此无法进行汇总分析。这些发现突出表明,我们需要一种方法,通过试验要素的标准化来促进未来试验的合并分析。作为一种潜在的解决方案,我们开发了一种主协议,并根据多学科专家小组的意见进行了反复修订,分为三类:说明和一般信息、模板语言以及一系列常见儿科 ARDS 试验情景的文本选项。最后,我们将主协议部分与之前为儿科 ARDS 定义的相关 CDEs 相链接,并在一系列电子病例报告表中进行了记录:结论:已发现的大多数儿科 ARDS 试验规模较小,且在研究设计和结果报告方面存在差异。使用带有 CDE 的小儿 ARDS 试验主方案模板将有助于合并和比较小儿 ARDS 试验结果并增加知识库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信