High accuracy of intra-articular needle position during anterior landmark guided glenohumeral injections

IF 2.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"High accuracy of intra-articular needle position during anterior landmark guided glenohumeral injections","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.03.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Image-guided ultrasound or fluoroscopic glenohumeral injections have high accuracy rates but require training, equipment, cost, and radiation exposure (fluoroscopy). In contrast, landmark-guided glenohumeral injections do not require additional subspecialist referrals or equipment. An optimal technique would be safe and accurate and have few barriers to implementation. The purpose of this study was to define the accuracy of glenohumeral needle placement via an anterior landmark-guided approach as assessed by direct arthroscopic visualization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A consecutive series of adult patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position were included in this study. Demographic and procedural data were collected. The time required to perform the injection, the precise location of the needle tip, and factors that affected the accuracy of the injection were also assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A standardized anterior landmark-guided glenohumeral joint injection was performed in the operating room prior to surgery, and the location of the needle tip was documented by arthroscopic visualization with a low complication profile and few barriers to implementation. A total of 81 patients were enrolled. Successful intra-articular glenohumeral needle placement by sports medicine and shoulder/elbow fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons was confirmed in 93.8% (76/81) of patients. The average time to complete the procedure was 24.8 ​s. There were no patient-related variables associated with nonintra-articular injections in the cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study demonstrated that the technique of anterior landmark-guided glenohumeral injection has an accuracy of 93.8% and requires less than 30 ​s to perform. This method is safe, yields similar accuracy to image-guided procedures, has improved cost and time efficiency, and requires less radiation exposure. No patient-related factors were associated with inaccurate needle placement. Anterior landmark-guided glenohumeral injections may be utilized with confidence by providers in the clinical setting.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level 5.</p><p>IRB: Approved under Stanford IRB-56323.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 534-539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775424000701/pdfft?md5=bd81c0a250221350e85550994e224ab3&pid=1-s2.0-S2059775424000701-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775424000701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Image-guided ultrasound or fluoroscopic glenohumeral injections have high accuracy rates but require training, equipment, cost, and radiation exposure (fluoroscopy). In contrast, landmark-guided glenohumeral injections do not require additional subspecialist referrals or equipment. An optimal technique would be safe and accurate and have few barriers to implementation. The purpose of this study was to define the accuracy of glenohumeral needle placement via an anterior landmark-guided approach as assessed by direct arthroscopic visualization.

Methods

A consecutive series of adult patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy in the beach chair position were included in this study. Demographic and procedural data were collected. The time required to perform the injection, the precise location of the needle tip, and factors that affected the accuracy of the injection were also assessed.

Results

A standardized anterior landmark-guided glenohumeral joint injection was performed in the operating room prior to surgery, and the location of the needle tip was documented by arthroscopic visualization with a low complication profile and few barriers to implementation. A total of 81 patients were enrolled. Successful intra-articular glenohumeral needle placement by sports medicine and shoulder/elbow fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons was confirmed in 93.8% (76/81) of patients. The average time to complete the procedure was 24.8 ​s. There were no patient-related variables associated with nonintra-articular injections in the cohort.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the technique of anterior landmark-guided glenohumeral injection has an accuracy of 93.8% and requires less than 30 ​s to perform. This method is safe, yields similar accuracy to image-guided procedures, has improved cost and time efficiency, and requires less radiation exposure. No patient-related factors were associated with inaccurate needle placement. Anterior landmark-guided glenohumeral injections may be utilized with confidence by providers in the clinical setting.

Level of Evidence

Level 5.

IRB: Approved under Stanford IRB-56323.

在前地标引导下进行盂肱关节注射时,关节内针头位置的准确性很高。
目标:图像引导的超声波或透视盂肱关节注射准确率高,但需要培训、设备、成本和辐射暴露(透视)。相比之下,地标引导的盂肱关节注射不需要额外的亚专科转诊或设备。最佳的技术应该是安全、准确、实施障碍少。本研究的目的是通过关节镜直视评估,确定通过前方地标引导方法进行盂肱关节针置入的准确性:本研究纳入了一系列在沙滩椅体位下接受肩关节镜检查的成年患者。收集了人口统计学和手术数据。还评估了注射所需时间、针尖的精确位置以及影响注射准确性的因素:结果:手术前在手术室进行标准化的前地标引导盂肱关节注射,通过关节镜观察记录针尖位置,并发症少,实施障碍小。共有 81 名患者入选。93.8%(76/81)的患者确认运动医学和肩/肘研究培训骨科外科医生成功进行了关节内盂肱针置入术。完成手术的平均时间为 24.8 秒。研究组中没有与非关节内注射相关的患者相关变量:这项研究表明,在前地标引导下进行盂肱关节注射的准确率高达 93.8%,且手术时间不到 30 秒。这种方法很安全,准确率与图像引导手术相似,但成本和时间效率更高,辐射量更少。患者相关因素均与针头放置不准确无关。前方地标引导下的盂肱关节注射可在临床环境中放心使用:证据等级:5 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信