Social media group support for antidepressant deprescribing: a mixed-methods survey of patient experiences.

Amy Coe, Noor Abid, Catherine Kaylor-Hughes
{"title":"Social media group support for antidepressant deprescribing: a mixed-methods survey of patient experiences.","authors":"Amy Coe, Noor Abid, Catherine Kaylor-Hughes","doi":"10.1071/PY23046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Antidepressant use has continually increased in recent decades and although they are an effective treatment for moderate-to-severe depression, when there is no longer a clinical benefit, deprescribing should occur. Currently, routine deprescribing is not part of clinical practice and research shows that there has been an increase in antidepressant users seeking informal support online. This small scoping exercise used a mixed-methods online survey to investigate the motives antidepressant users have for joining social media deprescribing support groups, and what elements of the groups are most valuable to them. Methods Thirty members of two antidepressant deprescribing Facebook groups completed an online survey with quantitative and open-text response questions to determine participant characteristics and motivation for group membership. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and open-text responses were analysed thematically through NVivo. Results Two overarching themes were evident: first, clinician expertise , where participants repeatedly reported a perceived lack of skills around deprescribing by their clinician, not being included in shared decision-making about their treatment, and symptoms of withdrawal during deprescribing going unaddressed. Motivated by the lack of clinical support, peer support developed as the second theme. Here, people sought help online where they received education, knowledge sharing and lived experience guidance for tapering. The Facebook groups also provided validation and peer support, which motivated people to continue engaging with the group. Conclusions Antidepressant users who wish to cease their medication are increasingly subscribing to specialised online support groups due to the lack of information and support from clinicians. This study highlights the ongoing need for such support groups. Improved clinician understanding about the complexities of antidepressant deprescribing is needed to enable them to effectively engage in shared decision-making with their patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Antidepressant use has continually increased in recent decades and although they are an effective treatment for moderate-to-severe depression, when there is no longer a clinical benefit, deprescribing should occur. Currently, routine deprescribing is not part of clinical practice and research shows that there has been an increase in antidepressant users seeking informal support online. This small scoping exercise used a mixed-methods online survey to investigate the motives antidepressant users have for joining social media deprescribing support groups, and what elements of the groups are most valuable to them. Methods Thirty members of two antidepressant deprescribing Facebook groups completed an online survey with quantitative and open-text response questions to determine participant characteristics and motivation for group membership. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and open-text responses were analysed thematically through NVivo. Results Two overarching themes were evident: first, clinician expertise , where participants repeatedly reported a perceived lack of skills around deprescribing by their clinician, not being included in shared decision-making about their treatment, and symptoms of withdrawal during deprescribing going unaddressed. Motivated by the lack of clinical support, peer support developed as the second theme. Here, people sought help online where they received education, knowledge sharing and lived experience guidance for tapering. The Facebook groups also provided validation and peer support, which motivated people to continue engaging with the group. Conclusions Antidepressant users who wish to cease their medication are increasingly subscribing to specialised online support groups due to the lack of information and support from clinicians. This study highlights the ongoing need for such support groups. Improved clinician understanding about the complexities of antidepressant deprescribing is needed to enable them to effectively engage in shared decision-making with their patients.

社交媒体小组支持抗抑郁药去势:患者体验混合方法调查。
背景 近几十年来,抗抑郁药的使用量持续增加,尽管它们是治疗中度至重度抑郁症的有效药物,但当临床疗效不再明显时,就应停药。目前,常规的停药并不是临床实践的一部分,而研究表明,越来越多的抗抑郁药物使用者在网上寻求非正式的支持。这项小型范围界定工作采用了一种混合方法在线调查,以调查抗抑郁药使用者加入社交媒体去处方化支持团体的动机,以及团体中哪些因素对他们最有价值。方法 两个抗抑郁药物处方支持 Facebook 群组的 30 名成员完成了一项在线调查,其中包括定量和开放文本回答问题,以确定参与者的特征和加入群组的动机。采用描述性统计对定量数据进行了分析,并通过 NVivo 对开放文本回复进行了主题分析。结果 有两个最重要的主题:首先是临床医生的专业知识,参与者多次报告称他们认为临床医生缺乏处方方面的技能,他们没有参与治疗的共同决策,处方期间的戒断症状也没有得到解决。由于缺乏临床支持,同伴支持成为第二个主题。在这里,人们通过网络寻求帮助,并在网上接受教育、知识分享和生活经验指导。Facebook 小组还提供了验证和同伴支持,这促使人们继续参与小组活动。结论 由于缺乏来自临床医生的信息和支持,希望停止服药的抗抑郁药使用者越来越多地订阅专门的在线支持小组。本研究强调了对此类支持小组的持续需求。临床医生需要更好地了解抗抑郁药物停药的复杂性,使他们能够有效地与患者共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信