Home-Based Cognitive Intervention for Healthy Older Adults Through Asking Robots Questions: Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.2196/47229
Seiki Tokunaga, Takuya Sekiguchi, Kumi Watanabe Miura, Hikaru Sugimoto, Masato S Abe, Kazuhiro Tamura, Taishiro Kishimoto, Takashi Kudo, Mihoko Otake-Matsuura
{"title":"Home-Based Cognitive Intervention for Healthy Older Adults Through Asking Robots Questions: Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Seiki Tokunaga, Takuya Sekiguchi, Kumi Watanabe Miura, Hikaru Sugimoto, Masato S Abe, Kazuhiro Tamura, Taishiro Kishimoto, Takashi Kudo, Mihoko Otake-Matsuura","doi":"10.2196/47229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asking questions is common in conversations, and while asking questions, we need to listen carefully to what others say and consider the perspective our questions adopt. However, difficulties persist in verifying the effect of asking questions on older adults' cognitive function due to the lack of a standardized system for conducting experiments at participants' homes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the intervention effect of cognitive training moderated by robots on healthy older adults. A focus on the feasibility of the intervention at participants' homes was also maintained. Feasibility was evaluated by considering both the dropout rate during the intervention and the number of questions posed to each participant during the experiment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial with 81 adults older than 65 years. Participants were recruited through postal invitations and then randomized into 2 groups. The intervention group (n=40) received sessions where participants listened to photo-integrated stories and posed questions to the robots. The control group (n=41) received sessions where participants listened to photo-integrated stories and only thanked the robots for confirming participation. The participants participated in 12 dialogue sessions for 2-3 weeks. Scores of global cognitive functioning tests, recall tests, and verbal fluency tasks measured before and after the intervention were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant intervention effect on the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-Japanese scores, recall tests, and verbal fluency tasks. Additionally, our study successfully concluded with no participant dropouts at follow-up, confirming the feasibility of our approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no statistically significant evidence indicating intervention benefits for cognitive functioning. Although the feasibility of home-based interventions was demonstrated, we identified areas for improvement in the future, such as setting up more efficient session themes. Further research is required to identify the effectiveness of an improved cognitive intervention involving the act of asking questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e47229"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11058555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/47229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asking questions is common in conversations, and while asking questions, we need to listen carefully to what others say and consider the perspective our questions adopt. However, difficulties persist in verifying the effect of asking questions on older adults' cognitive function due to the lack of a standardized system for conducting experiments at participants' homes.

Objective: This study examined the intervention effect of cognitive training moderated by robots on healthy older adults. A focus on the feasibility of the intervention at participants' homes was also maintained. Feasibility was evaluated by considering both the dropout rate during the intervention and the number of questions posed to each participant during the experiment.

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial with 81 adults older than 65 years. Participants were recruited through postal invitations and then randomized into 2 groups. The intervention group (n=40) received sessions where participants listened to photo-integrated stories and posed questions to the robots. The control group (n=41) received sessions where participants listened to photo-integrated stories and only thanked the robots for confirming participation. The participants participated in 12 dialogue sessions for 2-3 weeks. Scores of global cognitive functioning tests, recall tests, and verbal fluency tasks measured before and after the intervention were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: There was no significant intervention effect on the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-Japanese scores, recall tests, and verbal fluency tasks. Additionally, our study successfully concluded with no participant dropouts at follow-up, confirming the feasibility of our approach.

Conclusions: There was no statistically significant evidence indicating intervention benefits for cognitive functioning. Although the feasibility of home-based interventions was demonstrated, we identified areas for improvement in the future, such as setting up more efficient session themes. Further research is required to identify the effectiveness of an improved cognitive intervention involving the act of asking questions.

通过向机器人提问对健康老年人进行家庭认知干预:随机对照试验。
背景:提问是交谈中常见的现象,在提问时,我们需要认真倾听他人的发言,并考虑我们提问的角度。然而,由于缺乏在参与者家中进行实验的标准化系统,验证提问对老年人认知功能的影响一直存在困难:本研究考察了机器人对健康老年人认知训练的干预效果。本研究还关注在参与者家中进行干预的可行性。通过考虑干预期间的辍学率和实验期间向每位参与者提出的问题数量来评估可行性:我们对 81 名 65 岁以上的成年人进行了随机对照试验。参与者是通过邮寄邀请函招募的,然后随机分为两组。干预组(人数为 40 人)的参与者在听故事的过程中向机器人提问。对照组(人数为 41 人)的参与者则聆听图片故事,并对机器人的参与表示感谢。参与者参加了 12 节对话课程,为期 2-3 周。比较了两组参与者在干预前后的全球认知功能测试、回忆测试和语言流畅性任务的得分:结果:干预对日语认知状况电话访谈得分、回忆测试和语言流畅性任务没有明显影响。此外,我们的研究圆满结束,随访中没有参与者退出,这证实了我们方法的可行性:结论:没有统计学意义上的证据表明干预对认知功能有益处。虽然证明了居家干预的可行性,但我们也发现了今后需要改进的地方,比如设置更有效的课程主题。还需要进一步研究,以确定改进后的认知干预措施(包括提问行为)的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信