Use and perceptions of nutrition information resources in systemic sclerosis: a Scleroderma Patient-centred Intervention Network (SPIN) cohort study.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Nora Østbø, Elizabeth Yakes Jimenez, Marie-Eve Carrier, Linda Kwakkenbos, Brett Thombs
{"title":"Use and perceptions of nutrition information resources in systemic sclerosis: a Scleroderma Patient-centred Intervention Network (SPIN) cohort study.","authors":"Nora Østbø, Elizabeth Yakes Jimenez, Marie-Eve Carrier, Linda Kwakkenbos, Brett Thombs","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/dt5hae","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>People with systemic sclerosis (SSc) may find it challenging to obtain high-quality nutrition and diet information. Objectives were to evaluate (i) how commonly different information resources are used and (ii) perceived trustworthiness, accessibility, comprehensibility, and individualisation of resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered the Scleroderma Patient-centred Intervention Network Nutrition Information Resources Survey to participants in an international cohort. Participants were asked if they had used 26 informational resources in four categories, including (i) health care providers, (ii) websites or social media, (iii) print materials, and (iv) events, and to rate each resource on trustworthiness, accessibility, comprehensibility, and individualisation (0 = not at all to 10 = completely).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>727 participants completed the survey. Most (94%) had sought nutrition or diet information from at least one resource. The most-used category was health care providers (86%), followed by print materials (68%), websites or social media (66%), and events (43%). People who had used a resource generally rated it more favourably across all domains than those who had not. The highest-rated resources across domains were conventional health care providers (doctors, registered dieticians, nurses), SSc patient organisations, SSc support groups, and university or research institution websites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Respondents used many different diet and nutrition information resources. They preferred resources from conventional health care providers, affiliated with credible institutions (e.g., SSc patient organisations), or with personal connections (e.g., SSc support groups). Future research should address the limited evidence base on nutrition in SSc and assess the quality of information provided by different information resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/dt5hae","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: People with systemic sclerosis (SSc) may find it challenging to obtain high-quality nutrition and diet information. Objectives were to evaluate (i) how commonly different information resources are used and (ii) perceived trustworthiness, accessibility, comprehensibility, and individualisation of resources.

Methods: We administered the Scleroderma Patient-centred Intervention Network Nutrition Information Resources Survey to participants in an international cohort. Participants were asked if they had used 26 informational resources in four categories, including (i) health care providers, (ii) websites or social media, (iii) print materials, and (iv) events, and to rate each resource on trustworthiness, accessibility, comprehensibility, and individualisation (0 = not at all to 10 = completely).

Results: 727 participants completed the survey. Most (94%) had sought nutrition or diet information from at least one resource. The most-used category was health care providers (86%), followed by print materials (68%), websites or social media (66%), and events (43%). People who had used a resource generally rated it more favourably across all domains than those who had not. The highest-rated resources across domains were conventional health care providers (doctors, registered dieticians, nurses), SSc patient organisations, SSc support groups, and university or research institution websites.

Conclusions: Respondents used many different diet and nutrition information resources. They preferred resources from conventional health care providers, affiliated with credible institutions (e.g., SSc patient organisations), or with personal connections (e.g., SSc support groups). Future research should address the limited evidence base on nutrition in SSc and assess the quality of information provided by different information resources.

系统性硬皮病患者对营养信息资源的使用和看法:以硬皮病患者为中心的干预网络(SPIN)队列研究。
目的:系统性硬化症(SSc)患者可能会发现获取高质量的营养和饮食信息具有挑战性。目的是评估:(i) 不同信息资源的常用程度;(ii) 信息资源的可信度、可获得性、可理解性和个性化:方法:我们对国际群组中的参与者进行了硬皮病患者中心干预网络营养信息资源调查。我们询问参与者是否使用过四类 26 种信息资源,包括 (i) 医疗保健提供者、(ii) 网站或社交媒体、(iii) 印刷材料和 (iv) 活动,并对每种资源的可信度、可获得性、可理解性和个性化进行评分(0 = 完全没有到 10 = 完全):727 名参与者完成了调查。大多数人(94%)至少从一种资源中寻求过营养或饮食信息。使用最多的资源是医疗保健提供者(86%),其次是印刷材料(68%)、网站或社交媒体(66%)和活动(43%)。与未使用过资源的人相比,使用过资源的人在所有领域对资源的评价都更高。在所有领域中,评价最高的资源是传统医疗服务提供者(医生、注册营养师、护士)、SSc 患者组织、SSc 支持团体以及大学或研究机构网站:受访者使用了多种不同的饮食和营养信息资源。结论:受访者使用过许多不同的饮食和营养信息资源,他们更喜欢来自传统医疗保健提供者、隶属于可信机构(如 SSc 患者组织)或与个人有联系(如 SSc 支持团体)的资源。未来的研究应解决有关 SSc 营养的证据基础有限的问题,并评估不同信息资源所提供信息的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信