Maintaining ethics, Integrity, and accountability: Best practices for reporting a meta-analysis.

IF 4 1区哲学 Q1 MEDICAL ETHICS

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1080/08989621.2024.2334722

Aditya K Panda

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This letter addresses the significance of conducting and reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses using the appropriate methods. It also highlights the importance of implementing the latest guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-2020, which ensures the maintenance of ethics, integrity, and accountability while reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

查看原文本刊更多论文

维护道德、诚信和责任：报告荟萃分析的最佳做法。

这封信阐述了使用适当方法进行和报告系统综述和荟萃分析的重要性。信中还强调了执行《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》（Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses，PRISMA）-2020 最新指南的重要性，该指南确保在报告系统综述和荟萃分析时维护道德、诚信和责任。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance MEDICAL ETHICS-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

14.70%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance is devoted to the examination and critical analysis of systems for maximizing integrity in the conduct of research. It provides an interdisciplinary, international forum for the development of ethics, procedures, standards policies, and concepts to encourage the ethical conduct of research and to enhance the validity of research results. The journal welcomes views on advancing the integrity of research in the fields of general and multidisciplinary sciences, medicine, law, economics, statistics, management studies, public policy, politics, sociology, history, psychology, philosophy, ethics, and information science. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees.