Comparing modified USPHS and FDI criteria for the assessment of glass ionomer restorations in primary molars utilising clinical and photographic evaluation.

IF 2.3 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1007/s40368-024-00892-9

N Larasati, M F Rizal, E Fauziah

{"title":"Comparing modified USPHS and FDI criteria for the assessment of glass ionomer restorations in primary molars utilising clinical and photographic evaluation.","authors":"N Larasati, M F Rizal, E Fauziah","doi":"10.1007/s40368-024-00892-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare the applicability of modified US Public Health Service (USPHS) and FDI criteria for evaluating glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations in primary posterior teeth through digital image analysis.Methods: This comparative analytic study was conducted at the Children's Dental Clinic RSKGM FKG UI, involving 40 GIC restorations on lower first primary molars in children aged 4-9 years. After cleaning, the restorations were assessed clinically using modified USPHS and FDI criteria before taking digital images, then the collected images were re-evaluated using both sets of criteria, and the clinical assessment results were compared to the digital image assessment results.Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the clinical evaluation of GIC restorations in primary teeth and their corresponding digital photographs when using the modified USPHS criteria, and although the use of FDI criteria yielded different results, these differences were not statistically significant.Conclusion: The assessment of GIC restorations through digital images aligns more closely with clinical assessments using the FDI criteria compared to the modified USPHS criteria.","PeriodicalId":47603,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"367-373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-024-00892-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the applicability of modified US Public Health Service (USPHS) and FDI criteria for evaluating glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations in primary posterior teeth through digital image analysis.

Methods: This comparative analytic study was conducted at the Children's Dental Clinic RSKGM FKG UI, involving 40 GIC restorations on lower first primary molars in children aged 4-9 years. After cleaning, the restorations were assessed clinically using modified USPHS and FDI criteria before taking digital images, then the collected images were re-evaluated using both sets of criteria, and the clinical assessment results were compared to the digital image assessment results.

Results: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between the clinical evaluation of GIC restorations in primary teeth and their corresponding digital photographs when using the modified USPHS criteria, and although the use of FDI criteria yielded different results, these differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The assessment of GIC restorations through digital images aligns more closely with clinical assessments using the FDI criteria compared to the modified USPHS criteria.

查看原文本刊更多论文

比较美国牙科医师协会（USPHS）和美国牙科医师协会（FDI）利用临床和照片评估初级臼齿玻璃离聚体修复体的修订标准。

目的：通过数字图像分析，比较修改后的美国公共卫生署（USPHS）和FDI标准在评估初级后牙玻璃离子粘固剂（GIC）修复体时的适用性：这项比较分析研究是在RSKGM FKG UI儿童牙科诊所进行的，涉及40名4-9岁儿童下第一乳磨牙的GIC修复体。清洁后，在拍摄数字图像前，使用修改后的 USPHS 和 FDI 标准对修复体进行临床评估，然后使用两套标准对收集的图像进行重新评估，并将临床评估结果与数字图像评估结果进行比较：统计分析表明，在使用修改后的 USPHS 标准时，基牙 GIC 修复体的临床评估结果与相应的数码照片之间存在显著差异；而使用 FDI 标准时，虽然结果有所不同，但这些差异在统计上并不显著：结论：与修改后的 USPHS 标准相比，使用 FDI 标准通过数字图像对 GIC 修复体进行评估与临床评估更为一致。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim and scope of European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry for children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs. The EAPD focuses on the publication and critical evaluation of clinical and basic science research related to children. The EAPD will consider clinical case series reports, followed by the relevant literature review, only where there are new and important findings of interest to Paediatric Dentistry and where details of techniques or treatment carried out and the success of such approaches are given.