Effect of neurosurgical residency programs on neurosurgical patient outcomes in a single health care system: a cohort study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Shervin Taslimi, Susan B Brogly, Wenbin Li, Jillian Rodger, Ekkehard M Kasper, Douglas J Cook, Ron Levy
{"title":"Effect of neurosurgical residency programs on neurosurgical patient outcomes in a single health care system: a cohort study.","authors":"Shervin Taslimi, Susan B Brogly, Wenbin Li, Jillian Rodger, Ekkehard M Kasper, Douglas J Cook, Ron Levy","doi":"10.1503/cjs.008522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evidence on the benefits and drawbacks of involving neurosurgical residents in the care of patients who undergo neurosurgical procedures is heterogeneous. We assessed the effect of neurosurgical residency programs on the outcomes of such patients in a large single-payer public health care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten population-based cohorts of adult patients in Ontario who received neurosurgical care from 2013 to 2017 were identified on the basis of procedural codes, and the cohorts were followed in administrative health data sources. Patient outcomes by the status of the treating hospital (with or without a neurosurgical residency program) within each cohort were compared with models adjusted for a priori confounders and with adjusted multilevel models (MLMs) to also account for hospital-level factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 46 608 neurosurgical procedures were included. Operative time was 8%-30% longer in hospitals with neurosurgical residency programs in 9 out of 10 cohorts. Thirty-day mortality was lower in hospitals with neurosurgical residency programs for aneurysm repair (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.44), cerebrospinal fluid shunting (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.79), intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.84), and posterior lumbar decompression (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.65) in adjusted models. The mortality rates remained significantly different only for aneurysm repair (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.69) and cerebrospinal shunting (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.85) in MLMs. Length of stay was mostly shorter in hospitals with neurosurgical residents, but this finding did not persist in MLMs. Thirty-day reoperation rates did not differ between hospital types in MLMs. For 30-day readmission rates, only extracerebral hematoma decompression was significant in MLMs (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.07-1.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospitals with neurosurgical residents had longer operative times with similar to better outcomes. Most, but not all, of the differences between hospitals with and without residency programs were explained by hospital-level variables rather than direct effects of residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"67 3","pages":"E188-E197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11068422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.008522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The evidence on the benefits and drawbacks of involving neurosurgical residents in the care of patients who undergo neurosurgical procedures is heterogeneous. We assessed the effect of neurosurgical residency programs on the outcomes of such patients in a large single-payer public health care system.

Methods: Ten population-based cohorts of adult patients in Ontario who received neurosurgical care from 2013 to 2017 were identified on the basis of procedural codes, and the cohorts were followed in administrative health data sources. Patient outcomes by the status of the treating hospital (with or without a neurosurgical residency program) within each cohort were compared with models adjusted for a priori confounders and with adjusted multilevel models (MLMs) to also account for hospital-level factors.

Results: A total of 46 608 neurosurgical procedures were included. Operative time was 8%-30% longer in hospitals with neurosurgical residency programs in 9 out of 10 cohorts. Thirty-day mortality was lower in hospitals with neurosurgical residency programs for aneurysm repair (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.44), cerebrospinal fluid shunting (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.79), intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.84), and posterior lumbar decompression (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.65) in adjusted models. The mortality rates remained significantly different only for aneurysm repair (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.69) and cerebrospinal shunting (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.85) in MLMs. Length of stay was mostly shorter in hospitals with neurosurgical residents, but this finding did not persist in MLMs. Thirty-day reoperation rates did not differ between hospital types in MLMs. For 30-day readmission rates, only extracerebral hematoma decompression was significant in MLMs (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.07-1.87).

Conclusion: Hospitals with neurosurgical residents had longer operative times with similar to better outcomes. Most, but not all, of the differences between hospitals with and without residency programs were explained by hospital-level variables rather than direct effects of residents.

神经外科住院医师培训项目对单一医疗保健系统中神经外科患者预后的影响:一项队列研究。
背景:有关神经外科住院医师参与神经外科手术患者护理的利弊证据不一。我们评估了神经外科住院医师项目对大型单方付费公共医疗系统中此类患者治疗效果的影响:根据程序代码确定了安大略省在 2013 年至 2017 年期间接受神经外科治疗的 10 个基于人群的成年患者队列,并在行政健康数据源中对这些队列进行了跟踪。在每个队列中,根据治疗医院的状况(有无神经外科住院医师培训计划)对患者的治疗结果进行了比较,并使用先验混杂因素调整模型和调整后的多层次模型(MLM)对医院层面的因素进行了考虑:结果:共纳入 46 608 例神经外科手术。在10个队列中的9个队列中,有神经外科住院医师项目的医院的手术时间延长了8%-30%。在调整后的模型中,有神经外科住院医师项目的医院在动脉瘤修补术(几率比 [OR] 0.30,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.20-0.44)、脑脊液分流术(OR 0.52,95% CI 0.34-0.79)、脑内出血排空术(OR 0.66,95% CI 0.52-0.84)和腰椎后路减压术(OR 0.32,95% CI 0.15-0.65)方面的三十天死亡率较低。只有动脉瘤修补术(OR 0.19,95% CI 0.05-0.69)和脑脊液分流术(OR 0.42,95% CI 0.21-0.85)的死亡率在多器官功能障碍患者中仍有明显差异。有神经外科住院医师的医院的住院时间大多较短,但这一结果在多层面医院中并不存在。在多层级医院中,不同类型医院的 30 天再手术率没有差异。就30天再入院率而言,只有脑外血肿减压术在多层面医院中具有显著性差异(OR 1.41,95% CI 1.07-1.87):结论:有神经外科住院医师的医院手术时间更长,但疗效相似甚至更好。有住院医师项目的医院和没有住院医师项目的医院之间的差异大部分(但并非全部)是由医院层面的变量而非住院医师的直接影响造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信