Using the Sensible Heat Flux Eddy Covariance-Based Exchange Coefficient to Calculate Latent Heat Flux from Moisture Mean Gradients Over Snow.

IF 2.3 3区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-04 DOI:10.1007/s10546-024-00864-y
Sergi González-Herrero, Armin Sigmund, Michael Haugeneder, Océane Hames, Hendrik Huwald, Joel Fiddes, Michael Lehning
{"title":"Using the Sensible Heat Flux Eddy Covariance-Based Exchange Coefficient to Calculate Latent Heat Flux from Moisture Mean Gradients Over Snow.","authors":"Sergi González-Herrero, Armin Sigmund, Michael Haugeneder, Océane Hames, Hendrik Huwald, Joel Fiddes, Michael Lehning","doi":"10.1007/s10546-024-00864-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In absence of the high-frequency measurements of wind components, sonic temperature and water vapour required by the eddy covariance (EC) method, Monin-Obukhov similarity theory (MOST) is often used to calculate heat fluxes. However, MOST requires assumptions of stability corrections and roughness lengths. In most environments and weather situations, roughness length and stability corrections have high uncertainty. Here, we revisit the modified Bowen-ratio method, which we call C-method, to calculate the latent heat flux over snow. In the absence of high-frequency water vapour measurements, we use sonic anemometer data, which have become much more standard. This method uses the exchange coefficient for sensible heat flux to estimate latent-heat flux. Theory predicts the two exchange coefficients to be equal and the method avoids assuming roughness lengths and stability corrections. We apply this method to two datasets from high mountain (Alps) and polar (Antarctica) environments and compare it with MOST and the three-layer model (3LM). We show that roughness length has a great impact on heat fluxes calculated using MOST and that different calculation methods over snow lead to very different results. Instead, the 3LM leads to good results, in part due to the fact that it avoids roughness length assumptions to calculate heat fluxes. The C-method presented performs overall better or comparable to established MOST with different stability corrections and provides results comparable to the direct EC method. An application of this method is provided for a new station installed in the Pamir mountains.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10546-024-00864-y.</p>","PeriodicalId":9153,"journal":{"name":"Boundary-Layer Meteorology","volume":"190 5","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11068579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boundary-Layer Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-024-00864-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In absence of the high-frequency measurements of wind components, sonic temperature and water vapour required by the eddy covariance (EC) method, Monin-Obukhov similarity theory (MOST) is often used to calculate heat fluxes. However, MOST requires assumptions of stability corrections and roughness lengths. In most environments and weather situations, roughness length and stability corrections have high uncertainty. Here, we revisit the modified Bowen-ratio method, which we call C-method, to calculate the latent heat flux over snow. In the absence of high-frequency water vapour measurements, we use sonic anemometer data, which have become much more standard. This method uses the exchange coefficient for sensible heat flux to estimate latent-heat flux. Theory predicts the two exchange coefficients to be equal and the method avoids assuming roughness lengths and stability corrections. We apply this method to two datasets from high mountain (Alps) and polar (Antarctica) environments and compare it with MOST and the three-layer model (3LM). We show that roughness length has a great impact on heat fluxes calculated using MOST and that different calculation methods over snow lead to very different results. Instead, the 3LM leads to good results, in part due to the fact that it avoids roughness length assumptions to calculate heat fluxes. The C-method presented performs overall better or comparable to established MOST with different stability corrections and provides results comparable to the direct EC method. An application of this method is provided for a new station installed in the Pamir mountains.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10546-024-00864-y.

利用基于涡协方差的显热通量交换系数计算雪上湿度平均梯度的潜热通量。
由于缺乏涡度协方差(EC)方法所需的风分量、声波温度和水蒸气的高频测量,莫宁-奥布霍夫相似理论(MOST)经常被用来计算热通量。不过,莫宁-奥布霍夫相似理论需要假设稳定性修正和粗糙度长度。在大多数环境和天气情况下,粗糙度长度和稳定性修正具有很高的不确定性。在此,我们重新探讨了修正的鲍文比率法(我们称之为 C 法),以计算雪上的潜热通量。在缺乏高频水蒸气测量数据的情况下,我们使用了声波风速计数据,这种数据已经变得更加标准。这种方法使用显热通量的交换系数来估算潜热通量。理论预测这两个交换系数相等,而且该方法避免了假设粗糙度长度和稳定性修正。我们将该方法应用于高山(阿尔卑斯山)和极地(南极洲)环境的两个数据集,并与 MOST 和三层模型(3LM)进行了比较。结果表明,粗糙度长度对使用 MOST 计算的热通量有很大影响,而且不同的雪上计算方法会导致截然不同的结果。相反,3LM 的结果很好,部分原因是它在计算热通量时避免了粗糙度长度假设。所介绍的 C 方法总体性能优于或可媲美采用不同稳定性修正的成熟 MOST 方法,其结果可与直接 EC 方法相媲美。在帕米尔山区安装的一个新站应用了该方法:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s10546-024-00864-y。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Boundary-Layer Meteorology
Boundary-Layer Meteorology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
14.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Boundary-Layer Meteorology offers several publishing options: Research Letters, Research Articles, and Notes and Comments. The Research Letters section is designed to allow quick dissemination of new scientific findings, with an initial review period of no longer than one month. The Research Articles section offers traditional scientific papers that present results and interpretations based on substantial research studies or critical reviews of ongoing research. The Notes and Comments section comprises occasional notes and comments on specific topics with no requirement for rapid publication. Research Letters are limited in size to five journal pages, including no more than three figures, and cannot contain supplementary online material; Research Articles are generally fifteen to twenty pages in length with no more than fifteen figures; Notes and Comments are limited to ten journal pages and five figures. Authors submitting Research Letters should include within their cover letter an explanation of the need for rapid publication. More information regarding all publication formats can be found in the recent Editorial ‘Introducing Research Letters to Boundary-Layer Meteorology’.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信