Development process, clinical utility, and preliminary psychometric evidence of a new tool for screening psychological distress in renal care settings: the Hemodialysis Distress Thermometer (HD-DT).

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Helena Sousa, Oscar Ribeiro, Daniela Figueiredo
{"title":"Development process, clinical utility, and preliminary psychometric evidence of a new tool for screening psychological distress in renal care settings: the Hemodialysis Distress Thermometer (HD-DT).","authors":"Helena Sousa, Oscar Ribeiro, Daniela Figueiredo","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2024.2347662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop, evaluate the clinical utility, and test the psychometric properties of a new tool - the Hemodialysis Distress Thermometer (HD-DT) - designed to screen self-reported psychological distress and its sources in adults receiving hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong><i>Phase 1</i> focused on the process of developing and evaluating the content validity and clinical utility of the HD-DT using a stepwise mixed-methods approach; in <i>Phase 2</i>, the measurement properties of the European Portuguese version of the HD-DT were tested against reference measures in a cross-sectional study (<i>n</i> = 134 people on hemodialysis); while in <i>Phase 3</i> the HD-DT was translated and culturally adapted into American English using forward-backward translation and review by a panel of experts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative findings suggested that the HD-DT was perceived by feedback panels as practical and useful for rapidly screening psychological distress in nephrology centers. The European Portuguese version of this new tool showed good test-retest reliability and high diagnostic accuracy using a cutoff point of ≥ 6 for total distress. High convergent validity was found with reference measures that assess psychological health, and symptoms of anxiety and depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the potential clinical utility of the HD-DT as an acceptable, reliable, and valid measure that can be used by health psychologists in clinical practice and research in renal care settings. Data collection to validate the American English version of the HD-DT is currently underway.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2024.2347662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop, evaluate the clinical utility, and test the psychometric properties of a new tool - the Hemodialysis Distress Thermometer (HD-DT) - designed to screen self-reported psychological distress and its sources in adults receiving hemodialysis.

Methods and measures: Phase 1 focused on the process of developing and evaluating the content validity and clinical utility of the HD-DT using a stepwise mixed-methods approach; in Phase 2, the measurement properties of the European Portuguese version of the HD-DT were tested against reference measures in a cross-sectional study (n = 134 people on hemodialysis); while in Phase 3 the HD-DT was translated and culturally adapted into American English using forward-backward translation and review by a panel of experts.

Results: Qualitative findings suggested that the HD-DT was perceived by feedback panels as practical and useful for rapidly screening psychological distress in nephrology centers. The European Portuguese version of this new tool showed good test-retest reliability and high diagnostic accuracy using a cutoff point of ≥ 6 for total distress. High convergent validity was found with reference measures that assess psychological health, and symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Conclusion: This study highlights the potential clinical utility of the HD-DT as an acceptable, reliable, and valid measure that can be used by health psychologists in clinical practice and research in renal care settings. Data collection to validate the American English version of the HD-DT is currently underway.

血液透析压力温度计 (HD-DT) 这一新工具的开发过程、临床实用性以及在肾脏护理环境中筛查心理压力的初步心理计量学证据。
研究目的本研究旨在开发、评估一种新工具--血液透析压力温度计(HD-DT)--的临床实用性并测试其心理测量特性,该工具旨在筛查接受血液透析的成年人自我报告的心理压力及其来源:第一阶段的重点是采用逐步式混合方法开发和评估 HD-DT 的内容有效性和临床实用性;在第二阶段,在一项横断面研究(n = 134 名血液透析患者)中,对照参考指标测试了 HD-DT 的欧洲葡萄牙语版本的测量特性;在第三阶段,采用正向逆向翻译法将 HD-DT 翻译成美式英语并进行文化调整,由专家小组进行审查:定性研究结果表明,反馈小组认为 HD-DT 在肾脏病中心快速筛查心理困扰方面既实用又有用。这一新工具的欧洲葡萄牙语版本显示出良好的重测可靠性和较高的诊断准确性,总困扰值的临界点为≥6。该工具与评估心理健康、焦虑和抑郁症状的参考指标具有很高的融合有效性:本研究强调了 HD-DT 的潜在临床实用性,它是一种可接受的、可靠且有效的测量方法,可供健康心理学家在肾病治疗机构的临床实践和研究中使用。目前正在收集数据,以验证 HD-DT 的美国英语版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信