Enhancing the usability of older DCD donors through strategic approaches in liver transplantation in the United States.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Liver Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1097/LVT.0000000000000376
Miho Akabane, Marc L Melcher, Carlos O Esquivel, Yuki Imaoka, W Ray Kim, Kazunari Sasaki
{"title":"Enhancing the usability of older DCD donors through strategic approaches in liver transplantation in the United States.","authors":"Miho Akabane, Marc L Melcher, Carlos O Esquivel, Yuki Imaoka, W Ray Kim, Kazunari Sasaki","doi":"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of older donors after circulatory death (DCD) for liver transplantation (LT) has increased over the past decade. This study examined whether outcomes of LT using older DCD (≥50 y) have improved with advancements in surgical/perioperative care and normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) technology. A total of 7602 DCD LT cases from the United Network for Organ Sharing database (2003-2022) were reviewed. The impact of older DCD donors on graft survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and HR analyses. In all, 1447 LT cases (19.0%) involved older DCD donors. Although there was a decrease in their use from 2003 to 2014, a resurgence was noted after 2015 and reached 21.9% of all LTs in the last 4 years (2019-2022). Initially, 90-day and 1-year graft survivals for older DCDs were worse than younger DCDs, but this difference decreased over time and there was no statistical difference after 2015. Similarly, HRs for graft loss in older DCD have recently become insignificant. In older DCD LT, NMP usage has increased recently, especially in cases with extended donor-recipient distances, while the median time from asystole to aortic cross-clamp has decreased. Multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that in the early phase, asystole to cross-clamp time had the highest HR for graft loss in older DCD LT without NMP, while in the later phases, the cold ischemic time (>5.5 h) was a significant predictor. LT outcomes using older DCD donors have become comparable to those from young DCD donors, with recent HRs for graft loss becoming insignificant. The strategic approach in the recent period could mitigate risks, including managing cold ischemic time (≤5.5 h), reducing asystole to cross-clamp time, and adopting NMP for longer distances. Optimal use of older DCD donors may alleviate the donor shortage.</p>","PeriodicalId":18072,"journal":{"name":"Liver Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of older donors after circulatory death (DCD) for liver transplantation (LT) has increased over the past decade. This study examined whether outcomes of LT using older DCD (≥50 y) have improved with advancements in surgical/perioperative care and normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) technology. A total of 7602 DCD LT cases from the United Network for Organ Sharing database (2003-2022) were reviewed. The impact of older DCD donors on graft survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and HR analyses. In all, 1447 LT cases (19.0%) involved older DCD donors. Although there was a decrease in their use from 2003 to 2014, a resurgence was noted after 2015 and reached 21.9% of all LTs in the last 4 years (2019-2022). Initially, 90-day and 1-year graft survivals for older DCDs were worse than younger DCDs, but this difference decreased over time and there was no statistical difference after 2015. Similarly, HRs for graft loss in older DCD have recently become insignificant. In older DCD LT, NMP usage has increased recently, especially in cases with extended donor-recipient distances, while the median time from asystole to aortic cross-clamp has decreased. Multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that in the early phase, asystole to cross-clamp time had the highest HR for graft loss in older DCD LT without NMP, while in the later phases, the cold ischemic time (>5.5 h) was a significant predictor. LT outcomes using older DCD donors have become comparable to those from young DCD donors, with recent HRs for graft loss becoming insignificant. The strategic approach in the recent period could mitigate risks, including managing cold ischemic time (≤5.5 h), reducing asystole to cross-clamp time, and adopting NMP for longer distances. Optimal use of older DCD donors may alleviate the donor shortage.

在美国肝脏移植手术中,通过战略方法提高老年 DCD 捐赠者的可用性。
背景:在过去十年中,使用循环死亡后老年供体进行肝移植(LT)的情况有所增加。本研究探讨了随着手术/围手术期护理和常温机灌注(NMP)技术的进步,使用年龄较大的DCD(≥50岁)进行LT的结果是否有所改善:方法:回顾了UNOS数据库(2003-2022年)中的7602例DCD LT病例。方法:回顾 UNOS 数据库(2003-2022 年)中的 7602 例 DCD LT 病例,使用 Kaplan-Meier 和危险比(HR)分析评估年龄较大的 DCD 供体对移植物存活率(GS)的影响:1,447例LT病例(19.0%)涉及年龄较大的DCD供体。虽然2003-2014年期间DCD供体的使用有所减少,但2015年后出现了回升,在过去四年(2019-2022年)中,DCD供体在所有LT中所占比例达到21.9%。起初,年龄较大的 DCD 的 90 天和一年 GS 比年龄较小的 DCD 差,但随着时间的推移,这种差异逐渐缩小,2015 年后已无统计学差异。同样,老年 DCD 移植损失的 HR 最近也变得不显著。在年龄较大的DCD LT中,NMP的使用最近有所增加,尤其是在供体-受体距离较远的病例中,而从心搏骤停到主动脉瓣交叉钳夹的中位时间有所缩短。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,在早期阶段,无 NMP 的高龄 DCD LT 中,从心搏骤停到交叉钳夹的时间对移植物损失的 HR 值最高,而在后期阶段,CIT(>5.5 h)是一个重要的预测因素:结论:使用年龄较大的DCD供体进行LT的结果与使用年轻DCD供体进行LT的结果相当,近期移植物丢失的HRs变得不明显。近期的战略方法可以降低风险,包括管理CIT(≤5.5小时)、缩短从心跳停止到交叉钳夹的时间以及在较长距离内采用NMP。优化使用年龄较大的 DCD 供体可缓解供体短缺问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Liver Transplantation
Liver Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Since the first application of liver transplantation in a clinical situation was reported more than twenty years ago, there has been a great deal of growth in this field and more is anticipated. As an official publication of the AASLD, Liver Transplantation delivers current, peer-reviewed articles on liver transplantation, liver surgery, and chronic liver disease — the information necessary to keep abreast of this evolving specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信