Patients with more complex ankle fractures are associated with poorer patient-reported outcome: an observational study of 11,733 patients from the Swedish Fracture Register.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Caroline Stigevall, Michael Möller, David Wennergren, Olof Wolf, Jan Ekelund, Carl Bergdahl
{"title":"Patients with more complex ankle fractures are associated with poorer patient-reported outcome: an observational study of 11,733 patients from the Swedish Fracture Register.","authors":"Caroline Stigevall, Michael Möller, David Wennergren, Olof Wolf, Jan Ekelund, Carl Bergdahl","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2024.40607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following ankle fractures, including all fracture types, have not been reported. It is therefore unclear whether fracture morphology correlates with outcome. We aimed to analyze PROMs in patients with an ankle fracture in relation to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) fracture classification using population-based register data from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients aged ≥ 18 years with an ankle fracture (AO/OTA 44A1-C3) registered in the SFR between 2012 and 2019 were retrieved from the register. Patients with completed PROM questionnaires (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale) on both day 0 (pre-trauma) and 1-year post-trauma were included. The difference in PROMs between day 0 and 1 year was calculated for each patient (delta value) and mean delta values were calculated at group level, based on the AO/OTA fracture classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>11,733 patients with 11,751 fractures with complete PROMs were included. According to the AO/OTA classification, 21% were A fractures, 67% were B fractures and 12% were C fractures. All groups of patients, regardless of fracture class (A1-C3), displayed an impairment in PROMs after 1 year compared with day 0. Type C fractures displayed a larger impairment in PROMs at group level than type B, which in turn had a greater impairment than type A. The same pattern was seen in groups 3, 2, and 1 for A and B fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that the AO/OTA classification is prognostic, where more complex fractures were associated with poorer PROMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"95 ","pages":"212-218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11075523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40607","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following ankle fractures, including all fracture types, have not been reported. It is therefore unclear whether fracture morphology correlates with outcome. We aimed to analyze PROMs in patients with an ankle fracture in relation to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) fracture classification using population-based register data from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR).

Methods: All patients aged ≥ 18 years with an ankle fracture (AO/OTA 44A1-C3) registered in the SFR between 2012 and 2019 were retrieved from the register. Patients with completed PROM questionnaires (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale) on both day 0 (pre-trauma) and 1-year post-trauma were included. The difference in PROMs between day 0 and 1 year was calculated for each patient (delta value) and mean delta values were calculated at group level, based on the AO/OTA fracture classification.

Results: 11,733 patients with 11,751 fractures with complete PROMs were included. According to the AO/OTA classification, 21% were A fractures, 67% were B fractures and 12% were C fractures. All groups of patients, regardless of fracture class (A1-C3), displayed an impairment in PROMs after 1 year compared with day 0. Type C fractures displayed a larger impairment in PROMs at group level than type B, which in turn had a greater impairment than type A. The same pattern was seen in groups 3, 2, and 1 for A and B fractures.

Conclusion: We found that the AO/OTA classification is prognostic, where more complex fractures were associated with poorer PROMs.

踝关节骨折较复杂的患者与较差的患者报告结果有关:对瑞典骨折登记处 11,733 名患者的观察研究。
背景和目的:踝关节骨折(包括所有骨折类型)后的患者报告结果测量(PROMs)尚未见报道。因此,骨折形态是否与预后相关尚不清楚。我们的目的是利用瑞典骨折登记处(SFR)的人口登记数据,分析踝关节骨折患者的PROM与Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association(AO/OTA)骨折分类的关系:方法:从登记册中检索 2012 年至 2019 年期间在 SFR 登记的所有年龄≥ 18 岁的踝关节骨折(AO/OTA 44A1-C3)患者。纳入的患者在第 0 天(创伤前)和创伤后 1 年均填写了 PROM 问卷(肌肉骨骼功能简易评估和 EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale)。根据 AO/OTA 骨折分类,计算每位患者第 0 天和 1 年的 PROMs 差异(delta 值),并计算各组的平均 delta 值:结果:共纳入了 11,733 名患者,其中 11,751 名骨折患者具有完整的 PROMs。根据 AO/OTA 分类,21% 为 A 型骨折,67% 为 B 型骨折,12% 为 C 型骨折。无论骨折等级(A1-C3)如何,所有组别患者的 PROMs 在 1 年后均较第 0 天有所下降。与 B 型骨折相比,C 型骨折在组别水平上显示出更大的 PROMs 损伤,而 B 型骨折又比 A 型骨折显示出更大的 PROMs 损伤:结论:我们发现,AO/OTA 分类可预测预后,骨折越复杂,PROM 越差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信