Safety and immunogenicity of a single dose of Tdap compared to Td in pregnant women in Mali and 3 its effect on infant immune responses: a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled phase 2 study.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-03-28 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102556
Fadima Cheick Haidara, Milagritos D Tapia, Fatoumata Diallo, Susana Portillo, Margaret Williams, Awa Traoré, Elizabeth Rotrosen, Elizabeth Hensel, Mat Makowski, Semhal Selamawi, Jonathan A Powell, Karen L Kotloff, Marcela F Pasetti, Samba O Sow, Kathleen M Neuzil
{"title":"Safety and immunogenicity of a single dose of Tdap compared to Td in pregnant women in Mali and 3 its effect on infant immune responses: a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled phase 2 study.","authors":"Fadima Cheick Haidara, Milagritos D Tapia, Fatoumata Diallo, Susana Portillo, Margaret Williams, Awa Traoré, Elizabeth Rotrosen, Elizabeth Hensel, Mat Makowski, Semhal Selamawi, Jonathan A Powell, Karen L Kotloff, Marcela F Pasetti, Samba O Sow, Kathleen M Neuzil","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While maternal pertussis vaccination is a strategy to reduce infant morbidity, safety and immunogenicity data are limited in sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to evaluate the safety of a single dose of tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) vaccine compared to tetanus and diphtheria vaccine (Td) vaccine in pregnant women in Bamako, Mali and to assess the pertussis toxin (PT) antibody response at birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this phase 2, single-centre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study, from 23 January 2019 to 10 July 2019, healthy 18-39 year old women in the second trimester of a singleton pregnancy were randomised 2:1 to receive Tdap or Td. Blood was tested for serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) against PT and other vaccine antigens using a qualified Meso Scale Discovery multiplex immunoassay. The co-primary objectives evaluated safety and birth anti-PT levels. Infant immune responses to whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTwP) were assessed. Statistical analysis was descriptive. This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03589768.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>133 women received Tdap and 67 received Td, with 126 and 66 livebirths, respectively. In the Tdap group, 22 serious adverse events (SAEs) including one maternal death occurred in 20 participants (15·0%), with 10 SAEs in 10 participants (14·9%) in the Td group. Among infants, 18 events occurred among 13 participants (10.3%) and 8 SAEs in 6 participants (9.1%), including three and two infant deaths, occurred in Tdap and Td groups, respectively. None were related to study vaccines. Anti-PT geometric mean concentration (GMC) at birth in the Tdap group was higher than in the Td group (55.4 [46.2-66.6] IU/ml vs 7.9 [5.4-11.5] IU/ml). One month after the third dose of DTwP, the GMC in infants born to mothers in the Tdap group were lower compared to the Td group (20.2 [13.7-29.9] IU/ml vs 77.2 [32.2-184.8] IU/ml). By 6 months of age, the anti- PT GMCs were 17.3 [12.8-23.4] IU/ml and 67.1 [35.5-126.7] IU/ml in Tdap and Td groups, respectively. At birth, anti-tetanus toxin (TT) GMCs were higher in infants in the Td vs Tdap group (5.9 [5.0-7.0] IU/ml vs 4.1 [3.5-4.8] IU/ml). Anti-diphtheria toxin GMCs were similar in both groups.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Tdap administered to pregnant women in Mali is safe and well-tolerated. Infants of mothers who received Tdap were born with high PT and protective anti-TT antibody levels. By six months of age, after primary vaccination, the PT levels were lower in the Tdap group compared to the Td group. The blunted immune responses to primary DTwP vaccination in the Tdap infant group warrant further study.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This project was funded by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), under contract numbers 75N93021C00012 (The Emmes Company), and HHSN27220130000221 (University of Maryland, Baltimore). Dr. Susana Portillo was supported by NIH award no. T32AI007524. NIAID, NIH provided Tdap vaccine (BOOSTRIX).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10998094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102556","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While maternal pertussis vaccination is a strategy to reduce infant morbidity, safety and immunogenicity data are limited in sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to evaluate the safety of a single dose of tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) vaccine compared to tetanus and diphtheria vaccine (Td) vaccine in pregnant women in Bamako, Mali and to assess the pertussis toxin (PT) antibody response at birth.

Methods: In this phase 2, single-centre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study, from 23 January 2019 to 10 July 2019, healthy 18-39 year old women in the second trimester of a singleton pregnancy were randomised 2:1 to receive Tdap or Td. Blood was tested for serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) against PT and other vaccine antigens using a qualified Meso Scale Discovery multiplex immunoassay. The co-primary objectives evaluated safety and birth anti-PT levels. Infant immune responses to whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTwP) were assessed. Statistical analysis was descriptive. This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03589768.

Findings: 133 women received Tdap and 67 received Td, with 126 and 66 livebirths, respectively. In the Tdap group, 22 serious adverse events (SAEs) including one maternal death occurred in 20 participants (15·0%), with 10 SAEs in 10 participants (14·9%) in the Td group. Among infants, 18 events occurred among 13 participants (10.3%) and 8 SAEs in 6 participants (9.1%), including three and two infant deaths, occurred in Tdap and Td groups, respectively. None were related to study vaccines. Anti-PT geometric mean concentration (GMC) at birth in the Tdap group was higher than in the Td group (55.4 [46.2-66.6] IU/ml vs 7.9 [5.4-11.5] IU/ml). One month after the third dose of DTwP, the GMC in infants born to mothers in the Tdap group were lower compared to the Td group (20.2 [13.7-29.9] IU/ml vs 77.2 [32.2-184.8] IU/ml). By 6 months of age, the anti- PT GMCs were 17.3 [12.8-23.4] IU/ml and 67.1 [35.5-126.7] IU/ml in Tdap and Td groups, respectively. At birth, anti-tetanus toxin (TT) GMCs were higher in infants in the Td vs Tdap group (5.9 [5.0-7.0] IU/ml vs 4.1 [3.5-4.8] IU/ml). Anti-diphtheria toxin GMCs were similar in both groups.

Interpretation: Tdap administered to pregnant women in Mali is safe and well-tolerated. Infants of mothers who received Tdap were born with high PT and protective anti-TT antibody levels. By six months of age, after primary vaccination, the PT levels were lower in the Tdap group compared to the Td group. The blunted immune responses to primary DTwP vaccination in the Tdap infant group warrant further study.

Funding: This project was funded by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), under contract numbers 75N93021C00012 (The Emmes Company), and HHSN27220130000221 (University of Maryland, Baltimore). Dr. Susana Portillo was supported by NIH award no. T32AI007524. NIAID, NIH provided Tdap vaccine (BOOSTRIX).

马里孕妇单剂量百白破与百日咳相比的安全性和免疫原性及其对婴儿免疫反应的影响:一项单中心、随机、双盲、主动对照的第二阶段研究。
背景:虽然孕产妇接种百日咳疫苗是降低婴儿发病率的一种策略,但撒哈拉以南非洲地区的安全性和免疫原性数据却很有限。我们旨在评估马里巴马科孕妇接种单剂破伤风、白喉和无细胞百日咳疫苗(Tdap)与接种破伤风和白喉疫苗(Td)的安全性,并评估出生时的百日咳毒素(PT)抗体反应:在这项 2 期、单中心、随机、双盲、主动对照研究中,从 2019 年 1 月 23 日至 2019 年 7 月 10 日,处于单胎妊娠后三个月的 18-39 岁健康女性以 2:1 的比例被随机分配接种百白破疫苗或百日咳疫苗。使用合格的 Meso Scale Discovery 多倍免疫测定法检测血液中针对 PT 和其他疫苗抗原的血清免疫球蛋白 G (IgG)。共同主要目标是评估安全性和出生时的抗 PT 水平。还评估了婴儿对全细胞百日咳疫苗(DTwP)的免疫反应。统计分析为描述性分析。该试验已在 clinicaltrials.gov 登记,编号为 NCT03589768:133 名妇女接受了 Tdap,67 名妇女接受了 Td,分别有 126 名和 66 名活产婴儿。在 Tdap 组中,有 20 名参与者(15-0%)发生了 22 起严重不良事件(SAE),其中包括一起产妇死亡事件,而在 Td 组中,有 10 名参与者(14-9%)发生了 10 起严重不良事件。在婴儿中,13 名参与者(10.3%)发生了 18 起事件,6 名参与者(9.1%)发生了 8 起 SAE,其中百白破组和百白破组分别有 3 名和 2 名婴儿死亡。这些事件均与研究疫苗无关。百白破组婴儿出生时的抗百白破几何平均浓度(GMC)高于白破组(55.4 [46.2-66.6] IU/ml vs 7.9 [5.4-11.5] IU/ml)。第三剂 DTwP 一个月后,Tdap 组母亲所生婴儿的 GMC 比 Td 组低(20.2 [13.7-29.9] IU/ml vs 77.2 [32.2-184.8] IU/ml)。6 个月大时,Tdap 组和 Td 组的抗 PT GMC 分别为 17.3 [12.8-23.4] IU/ml 和 67.1 [35.5-126.7] IU/ml。出生时,Td 组和 Tdap 组婴儿的抗破伤风毒素(TT)GMCs 分别为 5.9 [5.0-7.0] IU/ml 和 4.1 [3.5-4.8] IU/ml。两组的抗白喉毒素GMC相似:马里孕妇接种百白破疫苗安全且耐受性良好。接受百白破治疗的母亲的婴儿出生时 PT 和保护性抗 TT 抗体水平较高。到 6 个月大时,在接种初级疫苗后,百白破组的 PT 水平低于百破组。百白破婴儿组对 DTwP 初次接种的免疫反应较弱,这值得进一步研究:本项目由美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)国立过敏与传染病研究所(NIAID)资助,合同号为75N93021C00012(埃姆斯公司)和HHSN27220130000221(马里兰大学巴尔的摩分校)。苏珊娜-波蒂略博士(Dr. Susana Portillo)获得了美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)编号为 T32AI007524 的奖项支持。T32AI007524.美国国立卫生研究院 NIAID 提供百白破疫苗 (BOOSTRIX)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信