Care ally-assisted massage for Veterans with chronic neck pain: TOMCATT results

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
N. Munk , J.K. Daggy , J.E. Slaven , E. Evans , T. Foote , B.V. Laws , M.S. Matthias , M.J. Bair
{"title":"Care ally-assisted massage for Veterans with chronic neck pain: TOMCATT results","authors":"N. Munk ,&nbsp;J.K. Daggy ,&nbsp;J.E. Slaven ,&nbsp;E. Evans ,&nbsp;T. Foote ,&nbsp;B.V. Laws ,&nbsp;M.S. Matthias ,&nbsp;M.J. Bair","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Chronic neck pain (CNP) is prevalent and challenging to treat. Despite evidence of massage's effectiveness for CNP, multiple accessibility barriers exist. The Trial Outcomes for Massage: Care Ally-Assisted vs. Therapist Treated (TOMCATT) study examined a care ally-assisted massage (CA-M) approach compared to a waitlist control prior to a study design modification (WL-C<sub>0</sub>).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>CA-M consisted of in-person training for veteran/care-ally dyads to learn a standardized 30-minue massage routine, instructional DVD, and printed treatment manual. Participants were to complete three care ally-assisted massage sessions weekly for 12-weeks. Outcomes collected at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-months included validated measures of neck pain severity and associated disability. Linear mixed-model approaches were used for analysis with 3-months as the primary outcome timepoint.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants (<em>N</em> = 203) were 56.7 ± 14 years old, 75% White, 15% female, and 75% married/partnered. Among 102 CA-M participants, 45% did not attend the in-person training and subsequently withdrew from the study and were more likely to be younger (<em>p</em> = .016) and employed (<em>p</em> = .004). Compared to WL-C<sub>0</sub>, CA-M participants had statistically significant reductions in pain-related disability at 3-months (−3.4, 95%CI = [−5.8, −1.0]; <em>p</em> = .006) and 6-months (−4.6, 95%CI = [−7.0, −2.1]; <em>p</em> &lt; .001) and pain severity at 3-months (−1.3, 95%CI = [−1.9, −0.8]; p &lt; .001) and 6-months (−1.0, 95%CI = [−1.6, −0.4]; <em>p</em> = .007), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this analysis, CA-M led to greater reductions in CNP with disability and pain severity compared to WL-C<sub>0</sub>, despite treatment engagement and retention challenges. Future work is needed to determine how to better engage Veterans and their care-allies to attend CA-M training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424001447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Chronic neck pain (CNP) is prevalent and challenging to treat. Despite evidence of massage's effectiveness for CNP, multiple accessibility barriers exist. The Trial Outcomes for Massage: Care Ally-Assisted vs. Therapist Treated (TOMCATT) study examined a care ally-assisted massage (CA-M) approach compared to a waitlist control prior to a study design modification (WL-C0).

Methods

CA-M consisted of in-person training for veteran/care-ally dyads to learn a standardized 30-minue massage routine, instructional DVD, and printed treatment manual. Participants were to complete three care ally-assisted massage sessions weekly for 12-weeks. Outcomes collected at baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-months included validated measures of neck pain severity and associated disability. Linear mixed-model approaches were used for analysis with 3-months as the primary outcome timepoint.

Results

Participants (N = 203) were 56.7 ± 14 years old, 75% White, 15% female, and 75% married/partnered. Among 102 CA-M participants, 45% did not attend the in-person training and subsequently withdrew from the study and were more likely to be younger (p = .016) and employed (p = .004). Compared to WL-C0, CA-M participants had statistically significant reductions in pain-related disability at 3-months (−3.4, 95%CI = [−5.8, −1.0]; p = .006) and 6-months (−4.6, 95%CI = [−7.0, −2.1]; p < .001) and pain severity at 3-months (−1.3, 95%CI = [−1.9, −0.8]; p < .001) and 6-months (−1.0, 95%CI = [−1.6, −0.4]; p = .007), respectively.

Conclusion

In this analysis, CA-M led to greater reductions in CNP with disability and pain severity compared to WL-C0, despite treatment engagement and retention challenges. Future work is needed to determine how to better engage Veterans and their care-allies to attend CA-M training.

为患有慢性颈部疼痛的退伍军人提供护理盟友辅助按摩:TOMCATT 结果。
目的:慢性颈部疼痛(CNP)很普遍,治疗起来也很困难。尽管有证据表明按摩对慢性颈部疼痛有疗效,但仍存在多种可及性障碍。按摩试验结果:TOMCATT)研究对护理人员辅助按摩(CA-M)方法与研究设计修改(WL-C0)前的候补对照进行了比较:CA-M包括对退伍军人/护理盟友进行面对面培训,学习30分钟的标准化按摩程序、教学DVD和印刷治疗手册。参与者在 12 周内每周完成三次护理盟友协助的按摩疗程。在基线、1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月时收集的结果包括颈部疼痛严重程度和相关残疾的验证测量。采用线性混合模型法进行分析,以 3 个月为主要结果时间点:参与者(N = 203)年龄为 56.7 ± 14 岁,75% 为白人,15% 为女性,75% 已婚/有伴侣。在 102 名 CA-M 参与者中,45% 的人没有参加现场培训,随后退出了研究,他们更有可能是年轻人(p = .016)和有工作的人(p = .004)。与 WL-C0 相比,CA-M 参与者在 3 个月(-3.4,95%CI = [-5.8,-1.0];p = .006)和 6 个月(-4.6,95%CI = [-7.0,-2.1];p 结论:在这项分析中,与 WL-C0 相比,CA-M 能更大程度地降低 CNP 与残疾和疼痛的严重程度,尽管在参与治疗和坚持治疗方面存在挑战。今后需要开展工作,确定如何更好地吸引退伍军人及其护理人员参加 CA-M 培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信