Doing good while making profits: A typology of business models for social ventures

IF 5.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Lien De Cuyper, Bart Clarysse, Mike Wright
{"title":"Doing good while making profits: A typology of business models for social ventures","authors":"Lien De Cuyper, Bart Clarysse, Mike Wright","doi":"10.1002/sej.1502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research SummaryBuilding on business model research and the social entrepreneurship literature, we conceptually develop a set of business model choices for social ventures. These choices specify the scope of venture beneficiaries, the extent that customers and beneficiaries overlap, and how social meaning is attached to the venture's value proposition. Concurrent configurations of these choices give rise to four types of social business models: (1) Social Stimulators, (2) Social Providers, (3) Social Producers, and (4) Social Intermediaries. We illustrate this typology using data from seven social ventures and formulate propositions about the implications these business model choices have for a venture's value creation and value capture potential. We then discuss contributions to the literature on social ventures and social entrepreneurship, and the literature on business models.Managerial SummaryIn this article, we propose a framework outlining key business model choices for social ventures. These choices include the scope of target beneficiaries of the venture, the degree of overlap between customers and beneficiaries, and how the venture communicates its social mission through its value proposition. By combining these choices in different ways, we identify four distinct types of social business models which we call Social Stimulators, Social Providers, Social Producers, and Social Intermediaries. To bring this framework to life, we have examined data from seven real‐world social ventures, offering concrete examples to illustrate each type. For each of these four types of social business models, we have also formulated propositions about how the business model choices impact a venture's value creation and value capture potential.","PeriodicalId":51417,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research SummaryBuilding on business model research and the social entrepreneurship literature, we conceptually develop a set of business model choices for social ventures. These choices specify the scope of venture beneficiaries, the extent that customers and beneficiaries overlap, and how social meaning is attached to the venture's value proposition. Concurrent configurations of these choices give rise to four types of social business models: (1) Social Stimulators, (2) Social Providers, (3) Social Producers, and (4) Social Intermediaries. We illustrate this typology using data from seven social ventures and formulate propositions about the implications these business model choices have for a venture's value creation and value capture potential. We then discuss contributions to the literature on social ventures and social entrepreneurship, and the literature on business models.Managerial SummaryIn this article, we propose a framework outlining key business model choices for social ventures. These choices include the scope of target beneficiaries of the venture, the degree of overlap between customers and beneficiaries, and how the venture communicates its social mission through its value proposition. By combining these choices in different ways, we identify four distinct types of social business models which we call Social Stimulators, Social Providers, Social Producers, and Social Intermediaries. To bring this framework to life, we have examined data from seven real‐world social ventures, offering concrete examples to illustrate each type. For each of these four types of social business models, we have also formulated propositions about how the business model choices impact a venture's value creation and value capture potential.
在盈利的同时做好事:社会企业的商业模式类型学
研究摘要在商业模式研究和社会创业文献的基础上,我们从概念上为社会企业提出了一系列商业模式选择。这些选择规定了企业受益人的范围、客户和受益人的重叠程度,以及企业价值主张的社会意义。这些选择的同时配置产生了四种类型的社会商业模式:(1) 社会刺激者,(2) 社会提供者,(3) 社会生产者,以及 (4) 社会中介。我们利用七家社会企业的数据对这一类型进行了说明,并提出了这些商业模式选择对企业价值创造和价值获取潜力的影响。然后,我们讨论了对社会企业和社会创业文献以及商业模式文献的贡献。管理总结在本文中,我们提出了一个概述社会企业关键商业模式选择的框架。这些选择包括风险企业的目标受益人范围、客户与受益人之间的重叠程度,以及风险企业如何通过其价值主张传达其社会使命。通过将这些选择以不同的方式结合起来,我们确定了四种不同类型的社会商业模式,我们称之为社会激励者、社会提供者、社会生产者和社会中介。为了将这一框架付诸实践,我们研究了现实世界中七家社会企业的数据,提供了具体的例子来说明每种类型。针对这四类社会商业模式,我们还提出了关于商业模式选择如何影响企业价值创造和价值获取潜力的命题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal is a research journal that publishes original work recommended by a developmental, double-blind review process conducted by peer scholars. Strategic entrepreneurship involves innovation and subsequent changes which add value to society and which change societal life in ways which have significant, sustainable, and durable consequences. The SEJ is international in scope and acknowledges theory- and evidence-based research conducted and/or applied in all regions of the world. It is devoted to content and quality standards based on scientific method, relevant theory, tested or testable propositions, and appropriate data and evidence, all replicable by others, and all representing original contributions. The SEJ values contributions which lead to improved practice of managing organizations as they deal with the entrepreneurial process involving imagination, insight, invention, and innovation and the inevitable changes and transformations that result and benefit society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信