Safety and efficacy of long-term Sodium Channel Blocker therapy for Early Rhythm Control: The EAST-AFNET 4 trial

Andreas Rillig, Lars Eckardt, Katrin Borof, A John Camm, Harry J G M Crijns, Andreas Goette, Günter Breithardt, Marc D Lemoine, Andreas Metzner, Laura Rottner, Ulrich Schotten, Eik Vettorazzi, Karl Wegscheider, Antonia Zapf, Hein Heidbuchel, Stephan Willems, Larissa Fabritz, Renate B Schnabel, Christina Magnussen, Paulus Kirchhof
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of long-term Sodium Channel Blocker therapy for Early Rhythm Control: The EAST-AFNET 4 trial","authors":"Andreas Rillig, Lars Eckardt, Katrin Borof, A John Camm, Harry J G M Crijns, Andreas Goette, Günter Breithardt, Marc D Lemoine, Andreas Metzner, Laura Rottner, Ulrich Schotten, Eik Vettorazzi, Karl Wegscheider, Antonia Zapf, Hein Heidbuchel, Stephan Willems, Larissa Fabritz, Renate B Schnabel, Christina Magnussen, Paulus Kirchhof","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims Clinical concerns exist about the potential proarrhythmic effects of the sodium channel blockers flecainide and propafenone (SCB) in patients with cardiovascular disease. SCB were used to deliver early rhythm control (ERC) therapy in EAST-AFNET 4. Methods We analysed the primary safety outcome (death, stroke, or serious adverse events related to rhythm-control therapy) and primary efficacy outcome (cardiovascular death, stroke and hospitalization for worsening of heart failure or acute coronary syndrome) during SCB-intake for ERC patients (n = 1395) in EAST-AFNET 4. The protocol discouraged flecainide and propafenone in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and suggested stopping therapy upon QRS prolongation >25% on therapy. Results Flecainide or propafenone was given to 689 patients (age 69 (8) years; CHA2DS2-VASc 3.2 (1); 177 with heart failure; 41 with prior myocardial infarction, CABG or PCI; 26 with left ventricular hypertrophy >15 mm; median therapy duration 1,153 [237, 1,828] days). The primary efficacy outcome occurred less often in patients treated with SCB (3/100 (99/3,316) patient-years) than in patients who never received SCB (SCBnever 4.9/100 (150/3,083) patient-years, p < 0.001). There were numerically fewer primary safety outcomes in patients receiving SCB (2.9/100 (96/3,359) patient-years) than in SCBnever patients (4.2/100 (135/3,220) patient-years, adjusted p = 0.015). Sinus rhythm at 2 years was similar between groups (SCB 537/610 (88); SCBnever 472/579 (82)). Conclusion Long-term therapy with flecainide or propafenone appeared to be safe in the EAST-AFNET 4 trial to deliver effective ERC therapy, including in selected patients with stable cardiovascular disease such as coronary artery disease and stable heart failure. Clinical Trial Registration ISRCTN04708680, NCT01288352, EudraCT2010-021258-20, www.easttrial.org","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims Clinical concerns exist about the potential proarrhythmic effects of the sodium channel blockers flecainide and propafenone (SCB) in patients with cardiovascular disease. SCB were used to deliver early rhythm control (ERC) therapy in EAST-AFNET 4. Methods We analysed the primary safety outcome (death, stroke, or serious adverse events related to rhythm-control therapy) and primary efficacy outcome (cardiovascular death, stroke and hospitalization for worsening of heart failure or acute coronary syndrome) during SCB-intake for ERC patients (n = 1395) in EAST-AFNET 4. The protocol discouraged flecainide and propafenone in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and suggested stopping therapy upon QRS prolongation >25% on therapy. Results Flecainide or propafenone was given to 689 patients (age 69 (8) years; CHA2DS2-VASc 3.2 (1); 177 with heart failure; 41 with prior myocardial infarction, CABG or PCI; 26 with left ventricular hypertrophy >15 mm; median therapy duration 1,153 [237, 1,828] days). The primary efficacy outcome occurred less often in patients treated with SCB (3/100 (99/3,316) patient-years) than in patients who never received SCB (SCBnever 4.9/100 (150/3,083) patient-years, p < 0.001). There were numerically fewer primary safety outcomes in patients receiving SCB (2.9/100 (96/3,359) patient-years) than in SCBnever patients (4.2/100 (135/3,220) patient-years, adjusted p = 0.015). Sinus rhythm at 2 years was similar between groups (SCB 537/610 (88); SCBnever 472/579 (82)). Conclusion Long-term therapy with flecainide or propafenone appeared to be safe in the EAST-AFNET 4 trial to deliver effective ERC therapy, including in selected patients with stable cardiovascular disease such as coronary artery disease and stable heart failure. Clinical Trial Registration ISRCTN04708680, NCT01288352, EudraCT2010-021258-20, www.easttrial.org
长期钠通道阻滞剂治疗早期节律控制的安全性和有效性:EAST-AFNET 4试验
背景和目的 临床上对钠通道阻滞剂非卡尼和普罗帕酮(SCB)在心血管疾病患者中的潜在促心律失常作用存在担忧。在 EAST-AFNET 4 中,钠通道阻滞剂被用于早期节律控制 (ERC) 治疗。 方法 我们分析了 EAST-AFNET 4 中 ERC 患者(n = 1395)服用钠通道阻滞剂期间的主要安全性结果(死亡、中风或与节律控制治疗相关的严重不良事件)和主要有效性结果(心血管死亡、中风和因心衰或急性冠状动脉综合征恶化而住院)。该方案不鼓励左室射血分数降低的患者使用非卡尼和普罗帕酮,并建议在治疗过程中出现 QRS 延长 >25% 时停止治疗。结果 689 名患者接受了氟卡尼或普罗帕酮治疗(年龄 69 (8) 岁;CHA2DS2-VASc 3.2 (1);177 名心力衰竭患者;41 名既往患有心肌梗死、CABG 或 PCI;26 名左心室肥厚 >15 mm;中位疗程 1,153 [237, 1,828] 天)。与从未接受过SCB治疗的患者相比,接受过SCB治疗的患者(3/100(99/3,316)患者年)出现主要疗效结果的频率较低(从未接受过SCB治疗的患者为4.9/100(150/3,083)患者年,P&;lt; 0.001)。与从未接受过 SCB 治疗的患者(4.2/100 (135/3,220) 患者年,调整后 p = 0.015)相比,接受过 SCB 治疗的患者(2.9/100 (96/3,359) 患者年)的主要安全性结果更少。两组患者两年后的窦性心律相似(SCB 537/610 (88);SCBnever 472/579 (82))。结论 在EAST-AFNET 4试验中,使用非卡尼或普罗帕酮进行长期治疗似乎是安全的,可以提供有效的ERC治疗,包括对冠心病和稳定型心力衰竭等心血管疾病的特定患者。临床试验注册 ISRCTN04708680、NCT01288352、EudraCT2010-021258-20、www.easttrial.org
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信