Initial Clinical Experience with the Balloon-in-Basket Pulsed Field Ablation System: Acute Results of the VOLT CE Mark Feasibility Study

Prashanthan Sanders, Stewart Healy, Mehrdad Emami, Emily Kotschet, Amber Miller, Jonathan M Kalman
{"title":"Initial Clinical Experience with the Balloon-in-Basket Pulsed Field Ablation System: Acute Results of the VOLT CE Mark Feasibility Study","authors":"Prashanthan Sanders, Stewart Healy, Mehrdad Emami, Emily Kotschet, Amber Miller, Jonathan M Kalman","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims Pulsed field ablation (PFA) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) potentially offers improved safety and procedural efficiencies compared to thermal ablation. Opportunities remain to improve effective circumferential lesion delivery, safety, and workflow of first generation PFA systems. Here we aim to evaluate the initial clinical experience with a balloon-in-basket, 3D integrated PFA system with a purpose-built form factor for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Methods The VOLT CE Mark Study is a premarket, prospective, multi-centre, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Volt™ PFA System for the treatment of paroxysmal (PAF) or persistent AF (PersAF). Feasibility sub-study subjects underwent phrenic nerve evaluation, endoscopy, chest CT, and cerebral MRI. Study endpoints were the rate of primary serious adverse event within 7-days and acute procedural effectiveness. Results A total of 32 subjects (age 61.6 ± 9.6 years, 65.6% male, 84.4% PAF) were enrolled and treated in the feasibility sub-study and completed 30-day follow-up. Acute effectiveness was achieved in 99.2% (127/128) of treated PVs (96.9% of subjects, 31/32) with 23.8 ± 4.2 PFA applications/subject. Procedure, fluoroscopy, LA dwell and transpired ablation times were 124.6 ± 28.1, 19.8 ± 8.9, 53.0 ± 21.0, and 48.0 ± 19.9 minutes respectively. Systematic assessments of initial safety revealed no phrenic nerve injury, pulmonary vein stenosis, or esophageal lesions causally related to the PFA system, and 3 subjects with silent cerebral lesions (9.4%). There were no primary serious adverse events. Conclusions The initial clinical use of the Volt PFA System demonstrates acute safety and effectiveness in the treatment of symptomatic, drug refractory AF.","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims Pulsed field ablation (PFA) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) potentially offers improved safety and procedural efficiencies compared to thermal ablation. Opportunities remain to improve effective circumferential lesion delivery, safety, and workflow of first generation PFA systems. Here we aim to evaluate the initial clinical experience with a balloon-in-basket, 3D integrated PFA system with a purpose-built form factor for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. Methods The VOLT CE Mark Study is a premarket, prospective, multi-centre, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Volt™ PFA System for the treatment of paroxysmal (PAF) or persistent AF (PersAF). Feasibility sub-study subjects underwent phrenic nerve evaluation, endoscopy, chest CT, and cerebral MRI. Study endpoints were the rate of primary serious adverse event within 7-days and acute procedural effectiveness. Results A total of 32 subjects (age 61.6 ± 9.6 years, 65.6% male, 84.4% PAF) were enrolled and treated in the feasibility sub-study and completed 30-day follow-up. Acute effectiveness was achieved in 99.2% (127/128) of treated PVs (96.9% of subjects, 31/32) with 23.8 ± 4.2 PFA applications/subject. Procedure, fluoroscopy, LA dwell and transpired ablation times were 124.6 ± 28.1, 19.8 ± 8.9, 53.0 ± 21.0, and 48.0 ± 19.9 minutes respectively. Systematic assessments of initial safety revealed no phrenic nerve injury, pulmonary vein stenosis, or esophageal lesions causally related to the PFA system, and 3 subjects with silent cerebral lesions (9.4%). There were no primary serious adverse events. Conclusions The initial clinical use of the Volt PFA System demonstrates acute safety and effectiveness in the treatment of symptomatic, drug refractory AF.
球囊篮内脉冲场消融系统的初步临床经验:VOLT CE 标志可行性研究的急性结果
背景和目的 与热消融术相比,脉冲场消融术(PFA)治疗心房颤动(AF)具有更高的安全性和手术效率。改进第一代 PFA 系统的有效圆周病灶输送、安全性和工作流程的机会仍然存在。在此,我们旨在评估专门为肺静脉(PV)隔离设计的篮内球囊三维集成 PFA 系统的初步临床经验。方法 VOLT CE 标志研究是一项上市前、前瞻性、多中心、单臂研究,旨在评估 Volt™ PFA 系统治疗阵发性房颤(PAF)或持续性房颤(PersAF)的安全性和有效性。可行性子研究受试者接受了膈神经评估、内窥镜检查、胸部 CT 和脑磁共振成像检查。研究终点为 7 天内主要严重不良事件发生率和急性手术有效性。结果 共有 32 名受试者(年龄为 61.6 ± 9.6 岁,65.6% 为男性,84.4% 为 PAF)参加了可行性子研究,并完成了 30 天的随访。99.2%(127/128)接受治疗的 PV(受试者的 96.9%,31/32)达到了急性有效,PFA 应用次数为 23.8 ± 4.2 次/受试者。手术时间、透视时间、LA停留时间和转运消融时间分别为124.6±28.1分钟、19.8±8.9分钟、53.0±21.0分钟和48.0±19.9分钟。对初始安全性的系统评估显示,没有出现与 PFA 系统有因果关系的膈神经损伤、肺静脉狭窄或食管病变,有 3 名受试者出现无声脑部病变(9.4%)。没有发生主要的严重不良事件。结论 Volt PFA 系统的初步临床应用证明了治疗有症状的药物难治性房颤的急性安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信