Respond or not? Analyst recommendation and companies' press releases after adverse events

Tiffany Chiu, Victoria Chiu, Aiguo Wang, Tawei Wang, Yunsen Wang
{"title":"Respond or not? Analyst recommendation and companies' press releases after adverse events","authors":"Tiffany Chiu, Victoria Chiu, Aiguo Wang, Tawei Wang, Yunsen Wang","doi":"10.1111/acfi.13260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines whether management responds to adverse events and how the press releases after adverse events are associated with analyst recommendation. Using Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Section 10b lawsuits – manipulative and deceptive practices in securities trading – as the proxy for adverse events, we show that companies do not always address the events. However, by issuing a press release within 2 days after the event, the negative effect of the lawsuit on analyst recommendation is smaller. This study advances our understanding in responding to adverse events and provides practical implications for managers.","PeriodicalId":501109,"journal":{"name":"Accounting & Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines whether management responds to adverse events and how the press releases after adverse events are associated with analyst recommendation. Using Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Section 10b lawsuits – manipulative and deceptive practices in securities trading – as the proxy for adverse events, we show that companies do not always address the events. However, by issuing a press release within 2 days after the event, the negative effect of the lawsuit on analyst recommendation is smaller. This study advances our understanding in responding to adverse events and provides practical implications for managers.
回应还是不回应?不良事件发生后的分析师建议和公司新闻稿
本研究探讨了管理层是否会对不利事件做出回应,以及不利事件发生后的新闻稿与分析师建议之间的关联。使用《1934 年证券交易法》第 10b 条诉讼--证券交易中的操纵性和欺骗性行为--作为不利事件的代表,我们发现公司并不总是会处理这些事件。但是,如果在事件发生后 2 天内发布新闻稿,诉讼对分析师推荐的负面影响就会变小。这项研究加深了我们对不利事件应对的理解,并为管理者提供了实际启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信