‘Girls do this, guys do that’: how first-in-family students negotiate working-class gendered subjectivities during a time of social change

Sarah McDonald, Garth Stahl
{"title":"‘Girls do this, guys do that’: how first-in-family students negotiate working-class gendered subjectivities during a time of social change","authors":"Sarah McDonald, Garth Stahl","doi":"10.1007/s13384-024-00717-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite efforts to foster a more equitable gender representation, Australia's higher education sector and workforce continue to be highly segregated. This article focusses on the gendered experiences of first-in-family (FIF) students—many who are from low-socioeconomic communities—transitioning to Australian universities. In terms of the gendered nature of widening participation, we know students who are FIF will often study disciplines which align with traditional gender norms. Drawing on the <i>First-in-Family Project</i> (<i>n</i> = 48), we present the analysis of our findings in two parts. First, we provide an overview of the cohort where we analyse the gendering of degree choice of FIF students. Second, underpinned by theoretical work focussed on student gendered and classed subjectivities, we address how FIF young people negotiated classed and gendered norms during the transition to university. Our data suggest that young people engage in ‘gender work’ and ‘class work’ which informs their identities and how they make choices about their futures. Based on our research, we argue that to achieve social justice there is a need for a renewed attention to gender within the widening participation agenda.</p>","PeriodicalId":501129,"journal":{"name":"The Australian Educational Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian Educational Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00717-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite efforts to foster a more equitable gender representation, Australia's higher education sector and workforce continue to be highly segregated. This article focusses on the gendered experiences of first-in-family (FIF) students—many who are from low-socioeconomic communities—transitioning to Australian universities. In terms of the gendered nature of widening participation, we know students who are FIF will often study disciplines which align with traditional gender norms. Drawing on the First-in-Family Project (n = 48), we present the analysis of our findings in two parts. First, we provide an overview of the cohort where we analyse the gendering of degree choice of FIF students. Second, underpinned by theoretical work focussed on student gendered and classed subjectivities, we address how FIF young people negotiated classed and gendered norms during the transition to university. Our data suggest that young people engage in ‘gender work’ and ‘class work’ which informs their identities and how they make choices about their futures. Based on our research, we argue that to achieve social justice there is a need for a renewed attention to gender within the widening participation agenda.

女生做这个,男生做那个":在社会变革时期,初入家庭的学生如何协商工人阶级的性别主体性
尽管澳大利亚努力促进更公平的性别代表性,但高等教育部门和劳动力队伍仍然高度隔离。本文重点探讨了 "先入家庭"(FIF)学生的性别体验--他们大多来自社会经济地位较低的社区--升入澳大利亚大学的经历。就扩大参与的性别性质而言,我们知道FIF学生通常会学习符合传统性别规范的学科。根据 "先入家庭项目"(n = 48),我们分两部分对研究结果进行了分析。首先,我们概述了这批学生的情况,分析了 FIF 学生学位选择的性别化。其次,在以学生性别和阶级主体性为重点的理论研究的支持下,我们探讨了 FIF 的年轻人在向大学过渡的过程中是如何协商阶级和性别规范的。我们的数据表明,年轻人参与了 "性别工作 "和 "阶级工作",这些工作影响了他们的身份以及他们如何对自己的未来做出选择。基于我们的研究,我们认为,为了实现社会公正,有必要在扩大参与议程中重新关注性别问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信